Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/659,532

SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
May 09, 2024
Priority
Nov 22, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0163379
Examiner
LEE, WOO KYUNG
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
SK hynix Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
167 granted / 204 resolved
+21.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
226
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
51.7%
+11.7% vs TC avg
§102
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
§112
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 204 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election without traverse of Invention I (Device), claims 1-6, in the reply filed on July 22, 2026 is acknowledged. Therefore, claims 1-6 are presented for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 6, Claim 6 recites the limitation "the source select line" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim, because “a source select line” was not previously introduced. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over by Kim (US 2023/0200068, Foreign priority: December 17, 2021 (KR), US filed on May 5, 2022) in view of Lue (US 2016/0260733). Regarding claim 1, Kim discloses for A semiconductor memory device comprising: a gate stack (gate stack bodies GST, Fig. 4) comprising interlayer insulating layers (insulating layers ILD, Fig. 4) and conductive pattern layers (conductive patterns CPn, Fig. 4), which are alternately stacked in a first direction (vertical direction, Fig. 4), the alternately stacked interlayer insulating layers (ILD, Fig. 4) and conductive pattern layers (CPn, Fig. 4) being supported by a substrate (substrate SUB, Fig. 4); a channel structure (channel structure CH, Fig. 4) passing through the gate stack (GST, Fig. 4) in the first direction (vertical direction, Fig. 4), the channel structure (CH, Fig. 4) having a protruding end (upper end of channel structure CH, Fig. 4), which extends above a top surface of the gate stack (above top surface of topmost ILD of GST, Fig. 4); a memory layer (memory layer ML, Fig. 4) surrounding the channel structure (CH, Fig. 4); and a source layer (source layer SL, Fig. 4) formed on the gate stack (GST, Fig. 4), wherein the channel structure (CH, Fig. 4) comprises: a channel layer (channel layer 15, Fig. 4) surrounding the core insulating layer (core insulating layer 11, Fig. 4). Kim differs from the claimed invention by not showing that a core insulating layer having a hollow central region and which comprises a VOID, wherein the VOID within the core insulating layer extends from a level below the lowest conductive pattern layer, upwardly in the first direction to a level, which is above the highest conductive pattern layer. However, Lue discloses a vertical channel-type 3D semiconductor memory device including a gate stack which a plurality of intermediate planes of conductive strips (i.e., wordlines WLs, Figs. 11-18) and layers of insulating material 1121-1125 are alternately stacked (Figs. 11-18). Lue further discloses that a vertical channel structure 2000-2005 include a fill 1160 (insulating structure, [0137], Fig. 11) with a gap 1161 formed therein (air gap, [0092]), therefore, the fill 1160 corresponds to the claimed core insulating layer and the gap 1161 corresponds to the claimed VOID, and as shown in Figs. 11-18, the gap 1161 extends from the level below the lowest intermediate planes of conductive strip WL, upwardly in the vertical direction, which is above the highest intermediate planes of conductive strip WL. Since both Kim and Lue teach a vertical channel semiconductor memory device, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Kim’s core insulating layer to include the hollow central void or airgap taught by Lue, and such modification would have used a known channel structure configuration to lower effective dielectric constant of the core insulating layer, reduce parasitic capacitance, and thereby improving the electrical performance the semiconductor memory device. Regarding claim 2, Kim further discloses that the source layer comprises: a first source layer (first source layer SL1 or 301, Fig. 4 or Fig. 8D) formed on an upper portion of the gate stack (upper portion of GST, Fig. 4) and around the protruding end of the channel structure (upper end of CH, Fig. 4); and a second source layer (third source layer SL3 or 305, Fig. 4 or Fig. 8D) formed on the first source layer (SL1, Fig. 4). Regarding claim 3, Kim further discloses that a least a portion of the first source layer (301, Fig. 8D) contacts an upper portion of the channel layer (upper portion of the channel layer 141, Fig. 8D). Regarding claim 4, Kim further discloses that the first source layer (301, Fig. 8D) is a doped polysilicon ([0099]). Regarding claim 5, Kim further discloses that the second source layer (305, Fig. 8D) is a low-resistance metal, because “the third source layer 305 may be formed of a metal material having low resistance. For example, the third source layer 305 may be formed of tungsten W, thus reducing the resistance of the source line structure” (emphasis added, [0101]). Regarding claim 6, Kim further discloses that the channel layer (141, Fig. 8D) includes a junction in a region adjacent to at least one conductive pattern layer (uppermost conductive pattern CPn, Fig. 4 or Fig. 8D) corresponding to the source select line, because the channel layer 141 by Kim includes a junction at the upper end of the channel layer in a region adjacent to the uppermost conductive pattern of the gate stack bodies GST (Fig. 8D), and Kim further discloses that “among the conductive patterns CP1 to CPn, an nth-conductive pattern CPn adjacent to a first source layer SL1, a second layer SL2, and a third source layer SL3 may be used as the source elect line SSL” ([0051]), therefore, the uppermost conductive pattern of the gate stack bodies by Kim may corresponds to the claimed source select line. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WOO K LEE whose telephone number is (571)270-5816. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:30 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JOSHUA BENITEZ can be reached at 571-270-1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAY C KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2815 /WOO K LEE/Examiner, Art Unit 2815
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751067
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12751266
Transistor Gate Contacts and Methods of Forming the Same
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12751063
INVERTED GATE CUT REGION
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742064
ENCAPSULATION FILM
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733177
PROGRAMMABLE CAPACITOR MEMORY ARRAYS WITH STACKED ACCESS TRANSISTORS
4y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+12.8%)
3y 2m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 204 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month