Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/660,576

SPAD STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 10, 2024
Priority
Mar 11, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0033749
Examiner
NEWTON, VALERIE N
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Db Hitek Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
769 granted / 915 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
952
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
81.8%
+41.8% vs TC avg
§102
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
§112
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 915 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 20220406823 (Wang et al). Concerning claim 1, Wang discloses a Single Photon Avalanche Diode (SPAD) structure comprising (Figs. 7 and 2 and [0016], it is noted that the features with same reference numerals are used are used in the different embodiment to identify the same features): a substrate (102) having a front surface (102f) and a rear surface (102b); a first impurity doped region (110) disposed on the front surface of the substrate within the substrate (Fig. 7 and [0021]); a second impurity doped region (112) disposed on the first impurity doped region within the substrate (Fig. 7 and [0021]); and a guide wall (114 +106) surrounding side walls of the first impurity doped region and the second impurity doped region within the substrate (Fig. 2). Continuing to claim 2, Wang discloses wherein the guide wall has an impurity doped region having a first conductivity type, and the first impurity doped region has an impurity doped region having a second conductivity type ([0062]). Considering claim 3, Wang discloses wherein the guide wall comprises a first region (114) that extends from the front surface of the substrate toward the rear surface of the substrate (Fig. 7). Referring to claim 4, Wang discloses wherein, within the substrate, the first region has a rear surface disposed higher than a rear surface of the second impurity doped region (Fig. 7, note that the rear surface of the first region 114 is the topmost surface as seen in Fig. 7 and it is higher than the topmost surface of the second impurity doped region 112). Regarding claim 5, Wang discloses wherein the guide wall further comprises a second region (106) that extends from a rear surface of the first region toward a rear surface of the second impurity doped region adjacent to the second region (Fig. 7 and [0033]). Pertaining to claim 6, Wang discloses wherein the second region is in contact with the second impurity doped region (Fig. 7, note that the second region is in contact with the second impurity region by way of the guard ring 108 with which it is in direct contact with). As to claim 7, Wang discloses wherein the second region has an opening so that the rear surface of the second impurity doped region is at least partially open (Fig. 7). Concerning claim 8, Wang discloses wherein the second region has impurities having the first conductivity type that has a lower concentration compared to a concentration of impurities having the first conductivity type of the first region ([0033]). Continuing to claim 9, Wang discloses further comprising: a first contact region disposed within the first impurity doped region on the front surface of the substrate ([0032]); and a second contact region (116) disposed apart from the first contact region on the front surface of the substrate within the substrate (Fig. 7). Considering claim 10, Wang discloses a guard ring (108) disposed between the guide wall and both the first impurity doped region and the second impurity doped region that are adjacent to the guide wall ([0033]). Referring to claim 11, Wang discloses wherein the guard ring has impurities having the first conductivity type that has a lower concentration compared to concentrations of impurities having the first conductivity type of the first region and the second region ([0033]). Regarding claim 12, Wang discloses a SPAD structure comprising (Figs. 7 and 2 and [0016], it is noted that the features with same reference numerals are used are used in the different embodiment to identify the same features): a substrate (102) having a front surface (102f) and a rear surface (102b); an isolation region (120) disposed at a boundary of a unit pixel ([0028]), a first impurity doped region (110) disposed on the front surface of the substrate within the substrate (Fig. 7 and [0021]); a second impurity doped region (112) disposed on the first impurity doped region within the substrate (Fig. 7); a first contact region disposed within the first impurity doped region on the front surface of the substrate ([0032]); and a second contact region (116) disposed between the front surface of the substrate and the isolation region; and a guide wall (114 +106) surrounding side walls of the first impurity doped region and the second impurity doped region within the substrate (Fig. 2), wherein the guide wall comprises: a first region (114) disposed on the second contact region within the substrate; and a second region (106) that is disposed on and extends from a rear surface of the first region such that the second region is in contact with the side wall of the second impurity doped region adjacent to the second region (Fig. 7, note that the second region is in contact with the second impurity region by way of the guard ring 108 with which it is in direct contact with). Pertaining to claim 13, Wang discloses wherein the first region has impurities having a first conductivity type which has a lower concentration compared to a concentration of impurities having the first conductivity type of the second contact region and which has a higher concentration compared to a concentration of impurities having the first conductivity type of the second region ([0032]-[0033]). As to claim 14, Wang discloses wherein the second contact region, the first region, and the second region have a first conductivity type impurity doping concentration that gradually decreases from the second contact region to the first region and from the first region to the second region ([0032]-[0033]). Concerning claim 15, Wang discloses wherein, the second region has a rear surface disposed higher than a rear surface of the second impurity doped region, the side wall of which is in contact with the second region (Fig. 7, note that the rear surface of the first region 114 is the topmost surface as seen in Fig. 7 and it is higher than the topmost surface of the second impurity doped region 112). Continuing to claim 16, Wang discloses wherein the first region is disposed apart from the side wall of the first impurity doped region adjacent to the first region (Fig. 7). Considering claim 17, Wang discloses wherein the guide wall has an impurity doped region of an opposite type to the first impurity doped region ([0062]). Referring to claim 18, Wang discloses a SPAD structure comprising (Figs. 7 and 2 and [0016], it is noted that the features with same reference numerals are used are used in the different embodiment to identify the same features), a substrate (102) having a front surface (102f) and a rear surface (102b); a first impurity doped region (110) disposed on the front surface of the substrate within the substrate (Fig. 7 and [0021]); a guide wall (114 +106) comprising a first region (114) disposed apart from the first impurity doped region within the substrate and a second region (106) traversing a unit pixel, the second region being disposed on the first region (Fig. 7); and a second impurity doped region (112) disposed within the second region (Fig. 7), wherein the second impurity doped region has impurities having a first conductivity type that has a lower concentration compared to a concentration of impurities having the first conductivity type of the second region ([0032]-[0033]). Regarding claim 19, Wang discloses wherein the second impurity doped region is formed by injecting impurities having a second conductivity type in the second region after the second region is formed ([0032]-[0033], it is noted that the limitations of this claim are considered to be product by process, and as such [E]ven though product-by-process claims are limited by and defined by the process, determination of patentability is based on the product itself. The patentability of a product does not depend on its method of production. If the product in the product-by-process claim is the same as or obvious from a product of the prior art, the claim is unpatentable even though the prior product was made by a different process." In re Thorpe, 777 F.2d 695, 698, 227 USPQ 964, 966 (Fed. Cir. 1985). Therefore because Wang discloses a second impurity doped region and a second region the structures are not structurally distinct and therefore the claim is anticipated.) Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20250089383 discloses a SPAD structure with a guide wall and guard ring configuration (Fig. 2). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VALERIE N NEWTON whose telephone number is (571)270-5015. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, CHAD DICKE can be reached at (571) 270-7996. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VALERIE N NEWTON/ Examiner, Art Unit 2897 06/27/26 /CHAD M DICKE/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672444
Display Substrate and Display Apparatus
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12666841
DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12666594
SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR FORMING SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12660228
NOVEL APPROACH TO CONTROLLING LINEARITY IN N-POLAR GAN MISHEMTS
4y 12m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12660255
Pulsed-laser modification of quantum-particle cells
4y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+6.0%)
2y 5m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 915 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month