Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/662,313

ADJUSTING A SENSING VOLTAGE IN MEMORY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 13, 2024
Examiner
TRAN, ANTHAN
Art Unit
2825
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Micron Technology, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
629 granted / 760 resolved
+14.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
785
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
52.6%
+12.6% vs TC avg
§102
33.6%
-6.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 760 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Previous restriction is withdrawn due to applicant’s arguments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Sivero et al. (US Pub. 2024/0265959). Regarding claim 1, Fig. 6 of Sivero discloses an apparatus, comprising: a memory having a group of memory cells [110, 112, Fig. 1], wherein a sub-group of the memory cells of the group remain programmed to a same data state [both cells 110 and 112 were programmed to “1” state, as shows in Fig. 1 and discloses in paragraph 0020]; and circuitry [combination of 120 and 130, Fig. 1] configured to: determine an amount of charge associated with the memory cells of the sub- group [steps 620 and 620, to read and to determine memory states, which is equivalent to determine an amount of charge]; and adjust a voltage [step 640] used to sense a data state of the memory cells of the group based, at least in part, on the determined amount of charge [combination of steps 630 and 640, adjust reading voltage by adding it to a constant voltage). Regarding claim 2, Fig. 6 of Sivero discloses wherein the circuitry is configured to adjust the voltage [VPL] used to sense the data state of the memory cells of the group by: generating a first voltage signal having a constant voltage value [∆]; and generating a second voltage signal [VPL = VPL + ∆, also as shows in Fig. 5] that is a function of the determined amount of charge. Regarding claim 3, Fig. 1 of Sivero discloses wherein: the circuitry includes a first capacitor [110] coupled to the first voltage signal [first voltage on PL] and a second capacitor [112] coupled to the second voltage signal [can be VPL or VPL+∆]; and the circuitry [120, 121, or 122] is configured to sense the data state of the memory cells of the group by: applying a voltage signal of the first capacitor to the voltage used to sense the data state [voltage on BL<0>] of the memory cells of the group; and applying a voltage signal of the second capacitor to the voltage used to sense the data state of the memory cells [voltage signal on BL<2>] while applying the voltage signal of the first capacitor to the voltage used to sense the data state of the memory cells. Regarding claim 4, Fig. 1 of Sivero discloses wherein the circuitry includes an amplifier [AMP] configured to generate the first voltage signal [Vs]. Regarding claim 5, Fig. 3 of Sivero discloses wherein the circuitry [330] is configured to adjust the voltage used to sense the data state of the memory cells of the group by generating a single voltage signal [output of 330] that is a function of the determined amount of charge and a constant voltage value. Regarding claim 6, Fig. 3 of Sivero discloses wherein: the circuitry includes a capacitor [315] coupled to the single voltage signal [315 couples to output of 330 through 320]; and the circuitry is configured to sense the data state of the memory cells of the group by applying a voltage signal of the capacitor [VS] to the voltage used to sense the data state of the memory cells. Regarding claim 7, Fig. 1 and Fig. 2B of Sivero discloses the group of memory cells comprises a page of memory cells [each page connects to a big line, as shows in Fig. 2B]; and the sub-group comprises a portion of the memory cells [2 of 3 cells] of the page. Regarding claim 8, Fig. 2A of Sivero discloses wherein the memory cells of the group are ferroelectric memory cells. Regarding claim 9, Fig. 1 and Fig. 6 of Sivero discloses a method of operating memory, comprising: determining an amount of charge [step 620, Fig. 6] associated with a sub-group of memory cells [110 and 112 in Fig. 1] of a memory, wherein: the sub-group of memory cells [cells 110 and 112] comprise a portion [2 of 3 cells] of a group of memory cells of the memory; and the sub-group of memory cells are programmed to a same data state [both memory cells are programmed to sate “1”]; adjusting a voltage [step 640] used to sense a data state of the memory cells of the group based, at least in part, on the determined amount of charge [base on step 630]; and sensing the data state of the memory cells of the group using the adjusted voltage [step 650, Fig. 6]. Regarding claim 10, Fig. 1 of Sivero discloses wherein the sub-group of memory cells are programmed to a displacement polarization state [paragraphs 0016 and 0022]. Regarding claim 11, Fig. 2B of Sivero discloses wherein the method includes determining the amount of charge associated with the sub-group of memory cells by: applying a voltage [voltage on WL] to access lines [WL]of the sub-group of memory cells; and determining an amount of charge on data lines [BL, step 640, Fig. 6] of the sub-group of memory cells responsive to applying the voltage to the access lines [WL volage must be high in order to active a memory cell] of the sub-group of memory cells. Regarding claim 12, Fig. 2B of Sivero discloses wherein the method includes sensing the data state of the memory cells of the group by: applying an additional voltage to access lines [another voltages applies to WL] of the group of memory cells after beginning to apply the voltage to the access lines of the sub-group of memory cells; and applying the adjusted voltage [VPL] to data lines [step 640, Fig. 6] of the group of memory cells while applying the additional voltage to the access lines of the group of memory cells [voltage on WL and PL and BL must be presented in order to select and sense a memory cell]. Regarding claim 13, Fig. 6 of Sivero discloses wherein the method includes determining the amount of charge [step 620] associated with the sub-group of memory cells responsive to receiving a command [read/sense command is inherent applied in order to perform a reading/sensing operation] to sense the data state of the memory cells of the group. Regarding claim 14, Fig. 6 of Sivero discloses wherein the method includes: receiving an additional command [another read/sense command to perform another reading/sensing operation] to sense the data state of the memory cells of the group; determining an amount of charge [step 620] associated with the sub-group of memory cells responsive to receiving the additional command; adjusting the voltage [step 640] used to sense the data state of the memory cells of the group based, at least in part, on the amount of charge determined responsive to receiving the additional command; and sensing the data state of the memory cells of the group using the adjusted voltage [step 650]. Regarding claim 15, Fig. 1 and Fig. 6 of Sivero discloses an apparatus, comprising: a memory having a group of memory cells [110 to 112, Fig. 1], wherein a sub-group of the memory cells [110 and 112] of the group remain programmed to a same average data state [both are programmed to state “1”]; and circuitry configured to: determine an amount of charge [step 640 and 630 in Fig. 6] associated with the memory cells of the sub- group; and adjust a voltage [step 640, adjust VPL] used to sense a data state of the memory cells of the group by adding a voltage value [∆] associated with the determined amount of charge to a constant voltage value [during calibration step in Fig. 3]. Regarding claim 16, Fig. 3 of Sivero discloses wherein the voltage value associated with the determined amount of charge is a function of the determined amount of charge [the amount of voltage change of VPL is depended on the amount of charge determined during reading operation, step 620 and 630s in Fig. 6]. Regarding claim 17, Fig. 3 of Sivero discloses wherein: the constant voltage value [∆] corresponds to a first voltage signal [Vs]; and the voltage value associated with the determined amount of charge corresponds to a second voltage signal [output of 330]. Regarding claim 18, Fig. 3 of Sivero discloses wherein the voltage value [VPL] associated with the determined amount of charge and the constant voltage value [∆] correspond to a single voltage signal [Vs]. Regarding claim 19, Fig. 3 of Sivero discloses wherein the circuitry [340] is configured to adjust the constant voltage value. Regarding claim 20 Fig. 3 of Sivero discloses wherein the circuitry is configured to adjust the voltage [VPL] used to sense a data state [step 650, Fig. 6] of the memory cells of the group by no more than a particular amount [can be any amount]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHAN T TRAN whose telephone number is (571)272-8709. The examiner can normally be reached MON-FRI, 9AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alexander G Sofocleous can be reached at 571-272-0635. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHAN TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2825
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12586631
MEMORY DEVICE HAVING LOAD OFFSET MISMATCH COMPENSATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12567463
THREE-STATE PROGRAMMING OF MEMORY CELLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12562225
HYBRID MEMORY FOR NEUROMORPHIC APPLICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12548605
INTERFACE CIRCUIT AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12548606
MULTI-MODE COMPATIBLE ZQ CALIBRATION CIRCUIT IN MEMORY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+2.2%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 760 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month