Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/663,385

GAMING SYSTEM AND METHOD WITH MULTI-LEVEL PLAYER-SELECTED BONUS GAME PARAMETERS

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
May 14, 2024
Examiner
LIDDLE, JAY TRENT
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
LNW Gaming, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allow Rate
345 granted / 601 resolved
-12.6% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
640
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
§103
33.9%
-6.1% vs TC avg
§102
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 601 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea without significantly more. The claim(s) recite(s) a method of operating a gaming machine, the method comprising the operations of: accepting, via a value input device, a physical item associated with a monetary value to establish a monetary balance; conducting, by game-logic circuitry, a game including: presenting, by a presentation assembly, a plurality of symbol-bearing reels, and an array; spinning and stopping the plurality of reels to land symbols from the reels in the array to produce an outcome; and randomly determining whether or not to award a bonus game; and in response to awarding the bonus game: displaying, via the presentation assembly, a first menu comprising choices of a first type associated with a first game parameter and choices of a second type associated with a second game parameter; accepting a first selection from the first menu, designating the first type as selected and the second type as unselected if a selected choice of the first selection is made from the choices of the first type and designating the first type as unselected and the second type as selected if the selected choice of the first selection is made from the choices of the second type; displaying, via the presentation assembly, a second menu comprising choices of the unselected type from the first menu and choices of a third type associated with a third game parameter; accepting a second selection from the second menu, designating the unselected type from the first menu as selected and the third type as unselected if a selected choice of the second selection is made from the choices of the unselected type from the first menu and designating the third type as selected if the selected choice of the second selection is made from the choices of the third type; setting the game parameter associated with the type of the first selection according to the selected choice of the first selection; setting the game parameter associated with the type of the second selection according to the selected choice of the second selection; randomly determining a choice from a weighted set of choices based on the selected choices of the first selection and the second selection, and setting the game parameter associated with the unselected type of choices to the randomly determined choice; presenting the bonus game via the presentation assembly according to the game parameters; and receiving, via at least one of one or more electronic input devices, a cash out input that initiates a payout from the monetary balance via a value output device. The above underlined portions of the claim are directed to rules of managing a wagering game which is deemed to be certain methods of organizing human activity (See 2106.04(a)(2)(II)(A)). This judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application because it appears to be just applying the abstract idea to a particular technological environment that the MPEP explains is not enough to integrate into a practical application (2106.04(d)). The claim(s) does/do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception because the only additional elements to the claim are basic parts to a wagering game machine (See US Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0029381 to Vancura at [0038]). All dependent claims have been analyzed but do not cure the deficiencies of the independent claims. Prior Art There are several examples in the prior art that show that a player can affect parameters by making a choice. For example, US Patent No. 10,127,762 to Hughes discloses such (See, e.g., fig. 6 and accompanying disclosure). However, it does not appear that any document, presently of record explicitly discloses in an anticipatory or obvious manner the limitation of “randomly determining a choice from a weighted set of choices based on the selected choices of the first selection and the second selection, and setting the game parameter associated with the unselected type of choices to the randomly determined choice,” as required by the independent claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure can be found on the Notice of References Cited. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jay Liddle whose telephone number is (571)270-1226. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dmitry Suhol can be reached at 571-272-4430. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Jay Trent Liddle/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 14, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594502
CONTENT STREAM PROCESSING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589314
RECORDING MEDIUM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE THAT GUIDE USER TO UTILIZE PLURAL FUNCTIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12585622
METHODS AND SYSTEMS PROVIDING NFT CHARACTERS ON A BLOCKCHAIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582913
SYSTEM, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576335
SELECTIVE GAME LOGIC PROCESSING BY A GAME SERVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+23.3%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 601 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month