Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/663,993

MEDIA STREAMING SYSTEMS AND METHODS WITH A PREFETCHING FUNCTION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 14, 2024
Examiner
GOODARZI, NASSER MOAZZAMI
Art Unit
2426
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Penthera Partners Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
33%
Grant Probability
At Risk
2-3
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
59%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 33% of cases
33%
Career Allow Rate
18 granted / 55 resolved
-25.3% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
5 currently pending
Career history
60
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
§103
47.7%
+7.7% vs TC avg
§102
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
§112
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 55 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 01/20/2026, 02/09/2026, 03/13/2026, and 03/30/2026 is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 3-5, and 7-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Upon further consideration of the claim 1, examiner is rejection claim 1 for the use of the phrase “or” in claim 1. It is not clear as to whether the manifest comprises a segment identifier for … or manifest comprises template information for … or both are required? It is the examiner understanding that the manifest should comprises both a segment identifier for … “and” template information for … Examiner recommend to applicant to change the phrase “or” to “and” to overcome this rejection. Claims 3-5, and 7-10 are rejected as being dependent upon rejected claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11, and 13-16 are allowed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Nasser Goodarzi whose telephone number is (571)272-4195. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:00am -4:30pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, James Kramer can be reached on 571-272-6783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571- 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217- 9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NASSER M GOODARZI/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2426
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 14, 2024
Application Filed
May 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Aug 26, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 28, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12579433
RESOURCE USAGE PREDICTION FOR DEEP LEARNING MODEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12556763
Dynamic Masking for Media Playback
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12513045
SERVERLESS NETWORK INTERFACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12513358
SETUP METHOD OF DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12505360
CONTINUOUS KNOWLEDGE GRAPH GENERATION USING CAUSAL EVENT GRAPH FEEDBACK
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
33%
Grant Probability
59%
With Interview (+26.1%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 55 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month