Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/666,034

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND FABRICATING METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 16, 2024
Priority
Feb 26, 2024 — CN PCT/CN2024/078561 +1 more
Examiner
HA, NATHAN W
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Yangtze Memory Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
1078 granted / 1181 resolved
+31.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
1193
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
44.5%
+4.5% vs TC avg
§102
32.7%
-7.3% vs TC avg
§112
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1181 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-13 in the reply filed on 8/21/26 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 6-9, and 12-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Gao et al. (US 2023/0187412, hereinafter, Gao.) In regard to claims 1 and 8, in fig. 6, Gao discloses a semiconductor device 15 (para [0019]), comprising: a plurality of dies 1 (para [0018]) stacked in a vertical direction; a thermal conductive layer 28 (para [0031]) deposited on a top surface of a topmost die 1C (para [0031]); a base die/interposer 2 (para [0018]) located on a bottom surface of a bottommost die; and a first contact structure 29 (para [0031]) extending vertically through the plurality of dies, wherein the first contact structure comprises one or more first channels, each first channel having a first end being in contact with the base die and having a second end being in contact with the thermal conductive layer. Regarding claims 2 and 9, Gao further comprising a second contact structure 13 (para [0020]) extending vertically inside the plurality of dies, wherein the second contact structure comprises one or more second channels, each second channel extending vertically and being in contact with the base die without contacting the thermal conductive layer. Fig. 6. Regarding claim 3, wherein the base die comprises a wiring structure including a first wiring structure and a second wiring structure, wherein the first wiring structure is configured to transport heat (described in para [0031]) and the second wiring structure is configured to transmit electronic signals (described in para [0020].) Regarding claims 6 and 12, wherein each of the first channel and the second channel is a continuous structure along the vertical direction. Fig. 6. Regarding claims 7 and 13, wherein the second contact structure is surrounded by the first contact structure. Fig. 6. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4-5 and 10-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gao as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Li et al. (US 2021/0217734, hereinafter, Li.) In regard to claims 4-5 and 10-11, Gao discloses all of the claimed limitations as mentioned above, except further comprising: an interposer on a side of the base die opposite to the plurality of dies, wherein the interposer comprises a ball grid array on a side of the interposer opposite to the base dies. Li, in fig. 1, for example, discloses an analogous semiconductor assembly 100 including stacked dies 103, a thermal layer 110a, a based die 122. Gao further discloses a substrate or interposer 120 with solder devices 125 in order to provide external connections. This is common in the art. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date to include the teaching as taught in order to take the advantage. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATHAN W HA whose telephone number is (571)272-1707. The examiner can normally be reached M-T: 8:00AM-6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, WAEL FAHMY can be reached at (571)-272-1705. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NATHAN W HA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2814
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 16, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747154
MICRO-ELECTRO-MECHANICAL SYSTEM AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744005
ARRAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12736826
IMAGE SENSOR INCLUDING COLOR SEPARATING LENS ARRAY AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE IMAGE SENSOR
5y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12740440
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND SEMICONDUCTOR MODULE
3y 12m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12737083
Display Apparatus
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+7.7%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1181 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month