Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/666,682

GENERATING PREDICTIONS FOR NON-STATIONARY DATA USING DISTRIBUTIONS OVER OUTPUT HEAD WEIGHTS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 16, 2024
Priority
May 17, 2023 — GR 20230100402
Examiner
RUDY, ANDREW J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
DeepMind Technologies Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
645 granted / 777 resolved
+23.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+15.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
782
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
§103
45.2%
+5.2% vs TC avg
§102
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§112
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 777 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . 2. Claims 1-20 are pending. Priority 3. Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Drawings 4. The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the claim limitation, e.g. claim 1, must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. It is noted that it appears none of the drawings show all of the features recited in the claims, e.g. claim 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 5. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The claims, e.g. claim 1, recited features that are not clear when reviewing the descriptive portion of the specification in juxtaposition with the drawings. As is, the metes and bounds of the claims may not be ascertained. 6. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1, line 6, the limitation “at each time step” is recited. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The phrase “a plurality of time steps” from line 4 does not cure this matter. Claim 19, line 8, the limitation “at each time step” is recited. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The phrase “a plurality of time steps” from line 6 does not cure this matter. 7. Pertinent references of interest are noted on the attached PTO-892. 8. Applicant’s Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) submitted December 5, 2025 has been reviewed. Note the attached IDS. 9. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW JOSEPH RUDY whose telephone number is 571-272-6789. The examiner can generally be reached on Monday thru Friday from about 10am-6pm EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful the examiner’s supervisor, Fadey Jabr, can be reached on 571-272-1516. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW JOSEPH RUDY/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 3668 571-272-6789
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 16, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704382
VEHICLE STOP POSITION DETERMINATION SYSTEM AND VEHICLE STOP POSITION DETERMINATION METHOD
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12703615
MOVEMENT CONTROL DEVICE, MOVEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM, MOVEMENT CONTROL METHOD, AND PROGRAM
1y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700302
DRIVER AGGRESSION AND ENERGY USE MONITORING DURING USE OF VEHICLE
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12691875
Vehicle Control Device, Vehicle Control Method, and Vehicle Control System
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12682281
REINFORCED FEDERATED LEARNING UTILIZING MULTIPLE SPECIALIZED MACHINE LEARNING AGENTS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+15.0%)
2y 10m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 777 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month