Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Deepmind Technologies Limited

23 pending office actions • 18 art units • 23 examiners • 21 of 23 (91%) have an AI response strategy ready • 35 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

23
Total Pending OAs
17
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 23 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

10
Overdue
2
Due this week
4
Due this month
7
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 23 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (10)Due ≤ 7 days (2)Due ≤ 30 days (4)Due ≤ 60 days (7)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (17%)
17
Medium (74%)
1
Easy (4%)
1
Unknown (4%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only4 (17%)
§103 only15 (65%)
§102 only2 (9%)
§112 only1 (4%)
No statute on record1 (4%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
16
Information Tech
70% of docket
4
Communications
17% of docket
2
Semiconductors
9% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
4% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

230 h
Manual time on pending OAs
46 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
80 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
2.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
JOHNSON, KYLE T 1 85.1% +15.5%
LUBIT, RYAN A 1 63.2% +38.3%
RAHAMAN, SHAHAN UR 1 76.0% +12.4%
TREHAN, AKSHAY 1 71.2% +23.8%
SUN, HAI TAO 1 73.2% +25.8%
CAO, CHUN 1 84.6% +12.6%
TABOR, AMARE F 1 82.8% +23.0%
ISHIZUKA, YOSHIHISA 1 68.5% +20.2%
WERNER, MARSHALL L 1 65.9% +45.3%
LE, JOHN H 1 87.9% +7.4%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18572914 CONTROLLING A MAGNETIC FIELD OF A MAGNETIC CONFINEMENT DEVICE USING A NEURAL NETWORK CAO, CHUN 20d
18981230 DISPATCHER-EXECUTOR SYSTEMS FOR MULTI-TASK LEARNING JOHNSON, KYLE T 40d

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18025304 CONTROLLING AGENTS USING RELATIVE VARIATIONAL INTRINSIC CONTROL SIPPEL, MOLLY CLARKE 44d overdue
18275737 GENERATING DIFFERENTIABLE ORDER STATISTICS USING SORTING NETWORKS LE, JOHN H 30d overdue
18334112 JOINTLY LEARNING EXPLORATORY AND NON-EXPLORATORY ACTION SELECTION POLICIES LEE, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER 11d overdue
18275933 PREDICTING PROTEIN AMINO ACID SEQUENCES USING GENERATIVE MODELS CONDITIONED ON PROTEIN STRUCTURE EMBEDDINGS WERNER, MARSHALL L 28d

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18277729 NOWCASTING USING GENERATIVE NEURAL NETWORKS ISHIZUKA, YOSHIHISA 38d overdue
18864656 VARIABLE RESOLUTION VARIABLE FRAME RATE VIDEO CODING USING NEURAL NETWORKS RAHAMAN, SHAHAN UR 10d overdue
18967935 LEARNED COMPUTER CONTROL USING POINTING DEVICE AND KEYBOARD ACTIONS LUBIT, RYAN A 3d overdue
18852940 ENHANCING IMAGES FROM A MOBILE DEVICE TO GIVE A PROFESSIONAL CAMERA EFFECT TREHAN, AKSHAY 5d
18572914 CONTROLLING A MAGNETIC FIELD OF A MAGNETIC CONFINEMENT DEVICE USING A NEURAL NETWORK CAO, CHUN 20d
18275933 PREDICTING PROTEIN AMINO ACID SEQUENCES USING GENERATIVE MODELS CONDITIONED ON PROTEIN STRUCTURE EMBEDDINGS WERNER, MARSHALL L 28d
18367305 RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORKS FOR DATA ITEM GENERATION TABOR, AMARE F 34d
18981230 DISPATCHER-EXECUTOR SYSTEMS FOR MULTI-TASK LEARNING JOHNSON, KYLE T 40d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2125 4
2857 2
2148 2
3656 1
2626 1
2426 1
2639 1
2616 1
2115 1
2434 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18981230 DISPATCHER-EXECUTOR SYSTEMS FOR MULTI-TASK LEARNING JOHNSON, KYLE T 3656 §103 Non-Final OA 40d Pending Dec 13, 2024
18967935 LEARNED COMPUTER CONTROL USING POINTING DEVICE AND KEYBOARD ACTIONS LUBIT, RYAN A 2626 §103 Final Rejection 3d overdue AI Ready Dec 04, 2024
18864656 VARIABLE RESOLUTION VARIABLE FRAME RATE VIDEO CODING USING NEURAL NETWORKS RAHAMAN, SHAHAN UR 2426 §103 Non-Final OA 10d overdue AI Ready Nov 11, 2024
18852940 ENHANCING IMAGES FROM A MOBILE DEVICE TO GIVE A PROFESSIONAL CAMERA EFFECT TREHAN, AKSHAY 2639 §103 Non-Final OA 5d AI Ready Sep 30, 2024
18600552 ANIMATING IMAGES USING POINT TRAJECTORIES SUN, HAI TAO 2616 §103 Final Rejection 53d AI Ready Mar 08, 2024
18572914 CONTROLLING A MAGNETIC FIELD OF A MAGNETIC CONFINEMENT DEVICE USING A NEURAL NETWORK CAO, CHUN 2115 §102 Non-Final OA 20d AI Ready Dec 21, 2023
18367305 RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORKS FOR DATA ITEM GENERATION TABOR, AMARE F 2434 Other Non-Final OA 34d AI Ready Sep 12, 2023
18277729 NOWCASTING USING GENERATIVE NEURAL NETWORKS ISHIZUKA, YOSHIHISA 2857 §103 Non-Final OA 38d overdue AI Ready Aug 17, 2023
18275933 PREDICTING PROTEIN AMINO ACID SEQUENCES USING GENERATIVE MODELS CONDITIONED ON PROTEIN STRUCTURE EMBEDDINGS WERNER, MARSHALL L 2125 §101 Non-Final OA 28d AI Ready Aug 04, 2023
18275737 GENERATING DIFFERENTIABLE ORDER STATISTICS USING SORTING NETWORKS LE, JOHN H 2857 §101 Non-Final OA 30d overdue AI Ready Aug 03, 2023
18230056 CONTROLLING AGENTS USING AUXILIARY PREDICTION NEURAL NETWORKS THAT GENERATE STATE VALUE ESTIMATES CHEN, KUANG FU 2143 §103 Non-Final OA 50d AI Ready Aug 03, 2023
18275332 RENDERING NEW IMAGES OF SCENES USING GEOMETRY-AWARE NEURAL NETWORKS CONDITIONED ON LATENT VARIABLES AHN, CHRISTINE YERA 2615 §103 Non-Final OA 39d AI Ready Aug 01, 2023
18275045 DETERMINING PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS USING MULTI-AGENT INTERACTION HINCKLEY, CHASE PAUL 2124 §103 Non-Final OA 13d AI Ready Jul 31, 2023
18334112 JOINTLY LEARNING EXPLORATORY AND NON-EXPLORATORY ACTION SELECTION POLICIES LEE, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER 2128 §101 Non-Final OA 11d overdue AI Ready Jun 13, 2023
18127551 ALLOCATING COMPUTING RESOURCES BETWEEN MODEL SIZE AND TRAINING DATA DURING TRAINING OF A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL TAN, DAVID H 2145 §103 Non-Final OA 38d overdue AI Ready Mar 28, 2023
18025304 CONTROLLING AGENTS USING RELATIVE VARIATIONAL INTRINSIC CONTROL SIPPEL, MOLLY CLARKE 2122 §101 Non-Final OA 44d overdue AI Ready Mar 08, 2023
18105180 CONTROLLING COMPUTING DEVICES USING HIERARCHICAL AGENTS LAU, KAITLYN RENEE 2148 §103 Final Rejection 54d Pending Feb 02, 2023
18072175 ACTION SELECTION FOR REINFORCEMENT LEARNING USING A MANAGER NEURAL NETWORK THAT GENERATES GOAL VECTORS DEFINING AGENT OBJECTIVES VAUGHN, RYAN C 2125 §103 Non-Final OA 42d AI Ready Nov 30, 2022
17959232 NEURAL NETWORKS WITH TRANSFORMED ACTIVATION FUNCTION LAYERS HADDAD, MAJD MAHER 2125 §103 Non-Final OA 31d overdue AI Ready Oct 03, 2022
17797203 TRAINING MULTI-OBJECTIVE NEURAL NETWORK REINFORCEMENT LEARNING SYSTEMS PRESSLY, KURT NICHOLAS 2125 §102 Final Rejection 31d overdue AI Ready Aug 03, 2022
17625361 TRAINING A NEURAL NETWORK TO CONTROL AN AGENT USING TASK-RELEVANT ADVERSARIAL IMITATION LEARNING KAPOOR, DEVAN 2126 §103 Non-Final OA 26d AI Ready Jan 07, 2022
17359427 REINFORCEMENT LEARNING USING TARGET NEURAL NETWORKS PELLETT, DANIEL T 2121 §112 Final Rejection 5d AI Ready Jun 25, 2021
16818932 SCHEDULING COMPUTATION GRAPHS USING NEURAL NETWORKS BEJCEK II, ROBERT H 2148 §103 Final Rejection 156d overdue AI Ready Mar 13, 2020

Managing Deepmind Technologies Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month