Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/669,753

SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSING APPARATUS AND SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE MANUFACTURING METHOD USING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
May 21, 2024
Priority
Sep 19, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0124893
Examiner
ZERVIGON, RUDY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
61%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
720 granted / 1078 resolved
+6.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -5% lift
Without
With
+-5.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
1110
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
50.9%
+10.9% vs TC avg
§102
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
§112
15.4%
-24.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1078 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 requires in part “…wherein the pre-heating unit comprises a first lamp that is different from the upper lamp (106; Figure 1; [0031]).”. The claim does not specify what the structural difference is between the pre-heating unit first lamp and the upper lamp (106; Figure 1; [0031]). Are different by independent control, spectra, circuitry? Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 13, 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Wu; Chen-Ying et al. (US 20250118576 A1). Wu teaches a semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1), comprising: a support (119; Figure 1; [0030]) configured to support a wafer; a chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]) comprising an upper dome (116; Figure 1,8; [0030]) that is above the support (119; Figure 1; [0030]) and a lower dome (187; Figure 1; [0033]) that is below the support (119; Figure 1; [0030]); a facility cover (156,148; Figure 1; [0029]) that at least partially surrounds the chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]); a pre-heating unit (138; Figure 1; [0031]-”lamps”-Applicant’s 130; Figure 1) that is below the support (119; Figure 1; [0030]) and is configured to heat the wafer; an upper lamp (106; Figure 1; [0031]) that is on the chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]) and is configured to heat the wafer; a first process gas supply unit (129; Figure 1) configured to supply a first process gas to the chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]); a second process gas supply unit (196; Figure 1) configured to supply a second process gas to the chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]); a valve (183; Figure 1) that is between the second process gas supply unit (196; Figure 1) and the chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]); a pump (197; Figure 1) that is connected to the chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]) and is configured to discharge gas from the chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]); and a control unit (1070; Figure 1; [0050]-[0051]) that is configured to execute instructions (Figure 13; [0090]-[0099]) stored in a non-transitory storage medium (1072; Figure 1; [0050]-[0051]), wherein the instructions (Figure 13; [0090]-[0099]) comprise controlling the pre-heating unit (138; Figure 1; [0031]-”lamps”-Applicant’s 130; Figure 1), the upper lamp (106; Figure 1; [0031]), the first process gas supply unit (129; Figure 1), and the second process gas supply unit (196; Figure 1), wherein the pre-heating unit (138; Figure 1; [0031]-”lamps”-Applicant’s 130; Figure 1) comprises a first lamp that is different from the upper lamp (106; Figure 1; [0031]), as claimed by claim 1. The Examiner interprets the claimed “different” as Wu’s independent control of Wu’s heating sources (106,138) as discussed in [0102]. Wu further teaches: The semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1) of claim 1, wherein the instructions (Figure 13; [0090]-[0099]) comprise controlling the pre-heating unit (138; Figure 1; [0031]-”lamps”-Applicant’s 130; Figure 1) to heat the wafer before a thin film (“..one or more layers...”; [0041],[0095]) growth process is performed, as claimed by claim 2. See step 1304, 1306, 1308; Figure 13 The semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1) of claim 1, wherein: the first process gas comprises at least one of SiH4, Si2H6, SiCl2H2, SiCl3H, and SiCl4, the second process gas comprises at least one of at least one of GeH4, Ge2H6, GeH2Cl2, GeCl4, and Ge2Cl6, as claimed by claim 3. Applicant’s claim requirement for process gas identity is a claim requirement of intended use in the pending apparatus claims. Further, it has been held that claim language that simply specifies an intended use or field of use for the invention generally will not limit the scope of a claim (Walter , 618 F.2d at 769, 205 USPQ at 409; MPEP 2106). Additionally, in apparatus claims, intended use must result in a structural difference between the claimed invention and the prior art in order to patentably distinguish the claimed invention from the prior art. If the prior art structure is capable of performing the intended use, then it meets the claim (In re Casey,152 USPQ 235 (CCPA 1967); In re Otto , 136 USPQ 458, 459 (CCPA 1963); MPEP2115). The semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1) of claim 1, wherein the pre-heating unit (138; Figure 1; [0031]-”lamps”-Applicant’s 130; Figure 1) is below the chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]), as claimed by claim 13 The semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1) of claim 1, further comprising a reflector (810; Figure 8) that is on the chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]) and the upper lamp (106; Figure 1; [0031]) and that is configured to reflect light emitted from the upper lamp (106; Figure 1; [0031]), as claimed by claim 15 A semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1), comprising: a chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]) that comprises a support (119; Figure 1; [0030]) that is configured to support a wafer; a pre-heating unit (138; Figure 1; [0031]-”lamps”-Applicant’s 130; Figure 1) that is below the support (119; Figure 1; [0030]); an upper lamp (106; Figure 1; [0031]) that is above the support (119; Figure 1; [0030]); and a control unit (1070; Figure 1; [0050]-[0051]) that is configured to execute instructions (Figure 13; [0090]-[0099]) stored in a non-transitory storage medium (1072; Figure 1; [0050]-[0051]) to control the semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1) to perform operations comprising: depositing (1308; Figure 13) metal on the wafer; heating (1304; Figure 13; [0093]) the metal to form a metal-semiconductor ([0041]) compound layer on the wafer; and growing a thin film (“..one or more layers...”; [0041],[0095]) between the wafer and the metal-semiconductor ([0041]) compound layer, wherein growing the thin film (“..one or more layers...”; [0041],[0095]) comprises forming a first thin film (“..one or more layers...”; [0041],[0095]) and forming a second thin film (“..one or more layers...”; [0041],[0095]) on the first thin film (“..one or more layers...”; [0041],[0095]), wherein forming the first thin film (“..one or more layers...”; [0041],[0095]) comprises: supplying a first process gas to the chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]); heating (1304; Figure 13; [0093]) the wafer using the pre-heating unit (138; Figure 1; [0031]-”lamps”-Applicant’s 130; Figure 1) below the wafer; and heating (1304; Figure 13; [0093]) the wafer using the upper lamp (106; Figure 1; [0031]) to grow the first thin film (“..one or more layers...”; [0041],[0095]), as claimed by claim 16 The semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1) of claim 16, wherein the first thin film (“..one or more layers...”; [0041],[0095]) comprises silicon (Si), and wherein the second thin film (“..one or more layers...”; [0041],[0095]) comprises germanium (SiGe), as claimed by claim 17 The semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1) of claim 16, wherein forming the second thin film (“..one or more layers...”; [0041],[0095]) comprises: supplying the first process gas and a second process gas to the chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]); and heating (1304; Figure 13; [0093]) the wafer using the upper lamp (106; Figure 1; [0031]) to grow the second thin film (“..one or more layers...”; [0041],[0095]), as claimed by claim 18 The semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1) of claim 16, wherein: the wafer comprises a first region and a second region, the metal-semiconductor ([0041]) compound layer is on the first region and is not on the second region, and the first thin film (“..one or more layers...”; [0041],[0095]) and the second thin film (“..one or more layers...”; [0041],[0095]) are on the first region, as claimed by claim 19. The claim recites intended use claim requirements that are specific to the wafer’s composition and not part of the claimed structure for the pending apparatus claims. A semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1), comprising: a support (119; Figure 1; [0030]) configured to support a wafer; a chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]) comprising an upper dome (116; Figure 1,8; [0030]) that is above the support (119; Figure 1; [0030]) and a lower dome (187; Figure 1; [0033]) that is below the support (119; Figure 1; [0030]); a facility cover (156,148; Figure 1; [0029]) that at least partially surrounds the chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]); a pre-heating unit (138; Figure 1; [0031]-”lamps”-Applicant’s 130; Figure 1) that is below the support (119; Figure 1; [0030]) and is configured to heat the wafer; an upper lamp (106; Figure 1; [0031]) that is on the chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]) and is configured to heat the wafer; a gas inlet (123,117; Figure 1) on a first side of the chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]); a gas outlet (190, 1092; Figure 1) on a second side of the chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]); a first process gas supply unit (129; Figure 1) that is connected to the gas inlet (123,117; Figure 1) and is configured to supply a first process gas to the chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]); a second process gas supply unit (196; Figure 1) that is connected to the gas inlet (123,117; Figure 1) and is configured to supply a second process gas to the chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]); a valve (183; Figure 1) that is between the second process gas supply unit (196; Figure 1) and the chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]); a pump (197; Figure 1) that is connected to the gas outlet (190, 1092; Figure 1) and is configured to discharge gas from the chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]); and a control unit (1070; Figure 1; [0050]-[0051]) that is configured to execute instructions (Figure 13; [0090]-[0099]) stored in a non-transitory storage medium (1072; Figure 1; [0050]-[0051]), wherein the instructions (Figure 13; [0090]-[0099]) comprise controlling the pre-heating unit (138; Figure 1; [0031]-”lamps”-Applicant’s 130; Figure 1), the upper lamp (106; Figure 1; [0031]), the first process gas supply unit (129; Figure 1), and the second process gas supply unit (196; Figure 1), wherein the pre-heating unit (138; Figure 1; [0031]-”lamps”-Applicant’s 130; Figure 1) comprises a first lamp that is different from the upper lamp (106; Figure 1; [0031]), wherein the instructions (Figure 13; [0090]-[0099]) comprise controlling the pre-heating unit (138; Figure 1; [0031]-”lamps”-Applicant’s 130; Figure 1) to heat the wafer before a thin film (“..one or more layers...”; [0041],[0095]) growth process is performed, and wherein the instructions (Figure 13; [0090]-[0099]) comprise controlling the upper lamp (106; Figure 1; [0031]) to heat the wafer when the thin film (“..one or more layers...”; [0041],[0095]) growth process is performed, as claimed by claim 20. The Examiner interprets the claimed “different” as Wu’s independent control of Wu’s heating sources (106,138) as discussed in [0102]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wu; Chen-Ying et al. (US 20250118576 A1) in view of Kitamura; Masahito et al. (US 20160086801 A1). Wu is discussed above. Wu further teaches: The semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1) of claim 1, further comprising: a first supply line (first supply line between 196 and 183; Figure 1) that connects the second process gas supply unit (196; Figure 1) and the valve (183; Figure 1); a second supply line (121; Figure 1) that connects the valve (183; Figure 1) and the chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]) – claim 4 Wu does not teach: an exhaust line that connects the valve (183; Figure 1) and the pump (197; Figure 1) – claim 4 The semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1) of claim 4, wherein the instructions (Figure 13; [0090]-[0099]) further comprise controlling the valve (183; Figure 1) so that the first supply line (first supply line between 196 and 183; Figure 1) is connected to the second supply line (121; Figure 1) or the exhaust line, as claimed by claim 5 Kitamura also teaches a film forming apparatus (Figure 1) including controlled (280; va4,vb4,vc4; Figure 4) bypass valves (va4,vb4,vc4; Figure 1; [0064]-[0065]) from three distinct gas sources (220a-c; Figure 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Wu to add Kitamura’s bypass valves (va4,vb4,vc4; Figure 1; [0064]-[0065]). Motivation for Wu to add Kitamura’s bypass valves (va4,vb4,vc4; Figure 1; [0064]-[0065]) is for “…a stable supply of the precursor gas into the process chamber 201 may be rapidly started or stopped through switching of the valves.” as taught by Kitamura ([0088]). Claims 6-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wu; Chen-Ying et al. (US 20250118576 A1) in view of Iwamoto; Kunihiko et al. (US 20060180082 A1). Wu is discussed above. Wu does not teach: Wu’s semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1) of claim 1, wherein Wu’s instructions (Figure 13; [0090]-[0099]) further comprise controlling Wu’s valve (183; Figure 1) such that Wu’s first process gas is supplied to Wu’s chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]) during a first time period and such that Wu’s first process gas and Wu’s second process gas are supplied to Wu’s chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]) during a second time period that is subsequent to Wu’s first time period, as claimed by claim 6 Wu’s semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1) of claim 6, wherein Wu’s instructions (Figure 13; [0090]-[0099]) further comprise controlling Wu’s valve (183; Figure 1) such that during Wu’s first time period, Wu’s second process gas is not supplied to Wu’s chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]), as claimed by claim 7 Iwamoto also teaches a wafer processing apparatus (Figure 4,5,7A,8-12) including pulsed gas delivery over common time intervals (time bracketted by vetical lines; Figure 12) and pulsed gas closure during other time periods (ammonia time period; Figure 12) under a controller (Figure 15). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Wu to optimize Wu’s process gas delivery as taught by Iwamoto. Motivation for Wu to optimize Wu’s process gas delivery as taught by Iwamoto is for prefferred film formation as taught by Wu (“..one or more layers...”; [0041],[0095]). Claims 8, 10, 11, 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wu; Chen-Ying et al. (US 20250118576 A1) in view of Iwamoto; Kunihiko et al. (US 20060180082 A1). Wu is discussed above. Wu does not teach: Wu’s semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1) of claim 1, wherein Wu’s instructions (Figure 13; [0090]-[0099]) further comprise controlling Wu’s pre-heating unit (138; Figure 1; [0031]-”lamps”-Applicant’s 130; Figure 1) to heat Wu’s wafer from a first temperature to a second temperature and to heat Wu’s wafer until a first time point, and wherein Wu’s instructions (Figure 13; [0090]-[0099]) further comprise controlling Wu’s upper lamp (106; Figure 1; [0031]) to heat Wu’s wafer to a third temperature that is greater than Wu’s second temperature and to heat Wu’s wafer until a second time point after Wu’s first time point, as claimed by claim 8 Wu’s semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1) of claim 8, wherein Wu’s instructions (Figure 13; [0090]-[0099]) further comprise controlling Wu’s pre-heating unit (138; Figure 1; [0031]-”lamps”-Applicant’s 130; Figure 1) to maintain Wu’s third temperature of Wu’s wafer after Wu’s upper lamp (106; Figure 1; [0031]) heats Wu’s wafer to Wu’s third temperature, as claimed by claim 10 Wu’s semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1) of claim 8, wherein Wu’s first process gas supply unit (129; Figure 1) is configured to supply Wu’s first process gas to Wu’s chamber (137+187; Figure 1; [0031]) at a constant flow rate, as claimed by claim 11 Wu’s semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1) of claim 1, wherein Wu’s instructions (Figure 13; [0090]-[0099]) further comprise controlling Wu’s pre-heating unit (138; Figure 1; [0031]-”lamps”-Applicant’s 130; Figure 1) and Wu’s upper lamp (106; Figure 1; [0031]) to operate alternately and repeatedly, as controlled by claim 14 Iwamoto is discussed above. Iwamoto further teaches a wafer heating temperatrure profile (Figure 12) alternately and repeatedly as well as constant, over pulse time periods, flow rates. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Wu to optimize Wu’s control unit (1070; Figure 1; [0050]-[0051]) as taught by Iwamoto. Motivation for Wu to optimize Wu’s control unit (1070; Figure 1; [0050]-[0051]) as taught by Iwamoto is for prefferred film formation as taught by Wu (“..one or more layers...”; [0041],[0095]). Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wu; Chen-Ying et al. (US 20250118576 A1) and Iwamoto; Kunihiko et al. (US 20060180082 A1) in view of Carlson; David K. et al. (US 20220162756 A1). Wu and Iwamoto are discussed above. Wu and Iwamoto do not teach Wu’s semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1) of claim 8, wherein an operating time of Wu’s upper lamp (106; Figure 1; [0031]) in which Wu’s upper lamp (106; Figure 1; [0031]) heats Wu’s wafer to Wu’s third temperature is in a range of about 0.1 ms to about 5 ms, as claimed by claim 9. Carlson also teaches a lamp heated wafer processing apparatus with ms time operation of the heating flash lamps. ([0041]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Wu to use Carlson’s flash lamp as taught by Carlson. Motivation for Wu to use Carlson’s flash lamp as taught by Carlson is for RTP heating as taught by Carlson ([0041]). Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wu; Chen-Ying et al. (US 20250118576 A1) and Iwamoto; Kunihiko et al. (US 20060180082 A1) in view of Yamazaki, Shunpei (US 20020084261 A1). Wu and Iwamoto are discussed above. Wu and Iwamoto do not teach Wu’s semiconductor processing apparatus (Figure 1) of claim 8, wherein Wu’s upper lamp (106; Figure 1; [0031]) is a xenon arc lamp. Yamazaki also teaches a lamp heated wafer procesing apparatus with xenon lamps ([0049]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention for Wu to use Yamazaki’s xenon lamps. Motivation for Wu to use Yamazaki’s xenon lamps is for alternate and equivalent means for IR heating as taught by Yamazaki ([0049]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Wafer film processing using heating control include US 20230017768 A1; US 20090117714 A1-51; US 20130203269 A1; US 20250270734 A1; US 20250354291 A1; US 20250029850 A1 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Examiner Rudy Zervigon whose telephone number is (571) 272- 1442. The examiner can normally be reached on a Monday through Thursday schedule from 8am through 6pm EST. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Any Inquiry of a general nature or relating to the status of this application or proceeding should be directed to the Chemical and Materials Engineering art unit receptionist at (571) 272-1700. If the examiner cannot be reached please contact the examiner's supervisor, Parviz Hassanzadeh, at (571) 272- 1435. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http:/Awww.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or (571) 272-1000. /Rudy Zervigon/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1716
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 21, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112
Sep 22, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12751235
GAS SUPPLY SYSTEM, SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12749663
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING MODULE AND LASER BEAM PROVIDING METHOD
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744189
SEGMENTED GAS DISTRIBUTION PLATE FOR HIGH-POWER, HIGH-PRESSURE PROCESSES
4y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12740376
LIFT PIN ACTUATORS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSING SYSTEMS AND RELATED METHODS
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12740364
COLD PLATE FOR TRAPPING ETCHING AND DEPOSITION BYPRODUCTS
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
61%
With Interview (-5.4%)
3y 5m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1078 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month