Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/670,616

CABLE ATTACHMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
May 21, 2024
Priority
May 22, 2023 — provisional 63/503,694
Examiner
LEE, JOSHUA S
Art Unit
3784
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Peloton Interactive, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
436 granted / 692 resolved
-7.0% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+33.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
702
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
69.0%
+29.0% vs TC avg
§102
13.7%
-26.3% vs TC avg
§112
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 692 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group I (Claims 1-10) in the reply filed on 1/12/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that a search of one of the designated invention groups, each of which includes aspects of an apparatus with a grip assembly or structure to facilitate exercising, would naturally produce search results directed to the techniques, apparatuses, and/or other structure claimed within the other invention group. This is not found persuasive because a search for the invention of Group I would be limited to exercise devices involving grips attached to an exercise cable. However, a search for the invention of Group II would require a much broader search in areas involving multi-profile grips usable with virtually any type of exercise equipment, e.g., areas including ab rollers or rock-climbing walls. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 11-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 1/12/2026. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/25/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claims 3 and 6 are objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 3 line 4, “passed” should be changed to --passes--. In claim 6 line 2, “to first end” should be changed to --the first end--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the end" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by US 7,662,073 (Baldwin). Regarding claim 1, Baldwin discloses an apparatus (see weight lifting apparatus 600 embodiment of FIGS. 6A-9) comprising: a cable end grip assembly 600 configured to attach to an end of an exercise cable 202 (see annotated FIG. 9 below), comprising: a pliable strap 602 having a first end 604 adapted to attach to the end of the exercise cable 202 and a second end 606 comprising an attachment point adapted for connection to a cable attachment 202 (see annotated FIGS. 6A and 9 below); and a grip structure 612 adapted to engage the pliable strap 602 between the first end 604 and the second end 606, the grip structure 612 and pliable strap 602 adapted to provide a grip interface for a cable exercise (see annotated FIGS. 6A and 9 below). PNG media_image1.png 665 1129 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 756 546 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Baldwin teaches the apparatus of claim 1, and further discloses wherein the cable end grip assembly 600 is configured for use in an adjustable-height cable station and/or a cable resistance equipment (FIG. 9, Col 8:60-67). Regarding claim 3, Baldwin teaches the apparatus of claim 1, and further discloses wherein the grip structure 612 comprises molded rubber, plastic, and/or metal (grip structure 612 comprises plastic - Col 6:43-47) having at least one through-hole 624 through which the pliable strap 602 passes (see annotated FIGS. 6A-6B above); and wherein the pliable strap 602 passed through the through-hole 624 between the first end 604 and the second end 606 (see annotated FIGS. 6A-6B above). Regarding claim 4, Baldwin teaches the apparatus of claim 3, and further discloses wherein the attachment point comprises a pliable strap loop 620 extending from an end of the at least one through-hole 624 of the grip structure 612 (see annotated FIG. 6A above); wherein the pliable strap loop 620 is adapted for attachment to a carabiner 114 and/or a threaded link (see annotated FIG. 9 above); and/or the first end of the pliable strap is adapted to attach to a U-bracket attachment point for the cable end (Due to the “and/or” conjunction prior to this limitation, this limitation is optionally required to be met by the prior art. Therefore, this limitation was not considered in the rejection.). Regarding claim 5, Baldwin teaches the apparatus of claim 3, and further discloses wherein the grip structure 612 has a shape comprising a ball, a plug, a plug with a disk, and/or a flat disk (grip structure 612 has a plug with a disk shape as shown in FIG. 6B). Regarding claim 6, Baldwin teaches the apparatus of claim 1, and further discloses a fabric sleeve 628 (sleeve 628 is preferably made of fabric - Col 7:30-33) covering the pliable strap 602 from the end of the grip structure 612 to first end 604 (see annotated FIG. 6A above). Regarding claim 7, Baldwin discloses a method of mitigating damage to exercise cables comprising: providing a cable end grip assembly 600 configured to attach to an end of an exercise cable 202 (see annotated FIG. 9 below), comprising a pliable strap 602 having a first end 604 adapted to attach to the end of the exercise cable 202 and a second end 606 comprising an attachment point adapted for connection to a cable attachment 202 (see annotated FIGS. 6A and 9 below) and a grip structure 612 adapted to engage the pliable strap 602 between the first end 604 and the second end 606, the grip structure 612 and pliable strap 602 adapted to provide a grip interface for a cable exercise (see annotated FIGS. 6A and 9 below); attaching the pliable strap 602 to an attachment point of the cable end (see annotated FIG. 9 below); passing the pliable strap 602 through at least one hole 624 in the grip structure 612 (see annotated FIGS. 6A-6B below); and attaching a pliable strap loop 620 extending from the hole 624 of the grip structure 612 to an attachment structure 114 (see annotated FIG. 9 below). PNG media_image1.png 665 1129 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 756 546 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 8, Baldwin teaches the method of claim 7, and further discloses covering the pliable strap 602 with a pliable sleeve 628 from an end of the grip structure 612 to the first end 604 of the pliable strap 602 (see annotated FIG. 6A above). Regarding claim 9, Baldwin teaches the method of claim 7, and further discloses wherein the attachment structure is a carabiner 114 (Col 7:61-63, see annotated FIG. 9 above), and wherein the method further comprises: attaching a multi-profile grip 612 to the carabiner 114, the multi-profile grip comprising an elongated body having a substantially flat side 622 adapted for pushing exercises and a curved side adapted for pulling exercises (tubular portion of grip 612 can be interpreted as the curved side - FIGS. 6A-6B; the grip 612 is capable of being used for pushing and pulling exercises and is attached to the carabiner 114 via the strap 602 components. Note that all components of the device are attached either directly together or via intermediary components). Regarding claim 10, Baldwin teaches the method of claim 7, and further discloses performing an exercise using the pliable strap 602 and grip structure 612 as a handle for pulling the cable 202 (Col 8:60-67, see annotated FIG. 9 above). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892 form. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSHUA S LEE whose telephone number is (571)270-1661. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 11am-7pm Eastern. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, LoAn Jimenez can be reached at 571-272-4966. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Joshua Lee/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3784
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 21, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
May 20, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 20, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636538
Trap Bar
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12623117
COLD START CALIBRATION
2y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12599805
BARBELL WEIGHTS
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588715
MULTI-FUNCTIONAL VEST WITH INTEGRATED WEIGHT AND HYDRATION FEATURES
1y 7m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586416
OBJECT FITTING USING QUANTITATIVE BIOMECHANICAL-BASED ANALYSIS
2y 1m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+33.5%)
2y 3m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 692 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month