Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
16 pending office actions • 9 art units • 13 examiners • 0 of 16 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 22 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 16 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 16 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 13 (81%) |
| §102 only | 3 (19%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KENNEDY, JOSHUA T | 2 | 51.2% | +48.3% |
| DICUIA, JONATHAN ANGELO | 2 | 50.8% | +60.2% |
| SHALU, ZELALEM W | 2 | 29.1% | +20.3% |
| JACKSON, JORDAN L | 1 | 40.8% | +38.5% |
| ALVESTEFFER, STEPHEN D | 1 | 56.9% | +24.3% |
| LEE, JOSHUA S | 1 | 63.0% | +33.5% |
| GRABER, MARIA EILEEN | 1 | 60.7% | +35.0% |
| SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. | 1 | 30.4% | +29.4% |
| DWYER, MATTHEW JAMES | 1 | — | — |
| BULLINGTON, ROBERT P | 1 | 43.2% | +30.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16110103 | CROWDSOURCED TRAINING FOR COMMANDS MATCHING | SHALU, ZELALEM W | 52d overdue |
| 16110108 | ROBUST REPLAY OF DIGITAL ASSISTANT OPERATIONS | SHALU, ZELALEM W | 9d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18491479 | USER EXPERIENCE PLATFORM FOR CONNECTED FITNESS SYSTEMS | KENNEDY, JOSHUA T | 138d overdue |
| 18667364 | EXERCISE BICYCLE SEAT POST | GRABER, MARIA EILEEN | 78d overdue |
| 18557554 | DYNAMIC PLAYBACK OF CONTENT DURING EXERCISE ACTIVITY | DICUIA, JONATHAN ANGELO | 77d overdue |
| 18557756 | WORKOUT INTENSITY METRICS FOR USERS OF A CONNECTED FITNESS PLATFORM | BULLINGTON, ROBERT P | 71d overdue |
| 16110103 | CROWDSOURCED TRAINING FOR COMMANDS MATCHING | SHALU, ZELALEM W | 52d overdue |
| 18612772 | HANDLE CONTROLS SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXERCISE EQUIPMENT | KENNEDY, JOSHUA T | 11d overdue |
| 16110108 | ROBUST REPLAY OF DIGITAL ASSISTANT OPERATIONS | SHALU, ZELALEM W | 9d overdue |
| 18680904 | RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM FOR A CONNECTED FITNESS PLATFORM | JACKSON, JORDAN L | 8d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3784 | 5 |
| 3715 | 3 |
| 2145 | 2 |
| 2857 | 1 |
| 3644 | 1 |
| 3684 | 1 |
| 2649 | 1 |
| 3797 | 1 |
| 2154 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18680904 | RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM FOR A CONNECTED FITNESS PLATFORM | JACKSON, JORDAN L | 2857 | §103 | Final Rejection | 8d | Pending | May 31, 2024 |
| 18680882 | DYNAMIC ROW RANKING OF CONNECTED FITNESS CONTENT | ALVESTEFFER, STEPHEN D | 3715 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 34d | Pending | May 31, 2024 |
| 18670616 | CABLE ATTACHMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS | LEE, JOSHUA S | 3784 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 33d | Pending | May 21, 2024 |
| 18667364 | EXERCISE BICYCLE SEAT POST | GRABER, MARIA EILEEN | 3644 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 78d overdue | Pending | May 17, 2024 |
| 18622377 | USER EXPERIENCE PERSONALIZATION IN A CONNECTED FITNESS PLATFORM | SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. | 3684 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 13d | Pending | Mar 29, 2024 |
| 18612772 | HANDLE CONTROLS SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EXERCISE EQUIPMENT | KENNEDY, JOSHUA T | 3784 | §103 | Final Rejection | 11d overdue | Pending | Mar 21, 2024 |
| 18431298 | ULTRA-WIDEBAND POSITIONING SYSTEM FOR WEARABLE AUGMENTED REALITY APPARATUS | DWYER, MATTHEW JAMES | 2649 | §103 | Final Rejection | 70d | Pending | Feb 02, 2024 |
| 18566381 | CONNECTED FITNESS GAMING PLATFORM | DICUIA, JONATHAN ANGELO | 3784 | §103 | Final Rejection | 12d | Pending | Dec 01, 2023 |
| 18557756 | WORKOUT INTENSITY METRICS FOR USERS OF A CONNECTED FITNESS PLATFORM | BULLINGTON, ROBERT P | 3715 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 71d overdue | Pending | Oct 27, 2023 |
| 18557554 | DYNAMIC PLAYBACK OF CONTENT DURING EXERCISE ACTIVITY | DICUIA, JONATHAN ANGELO | 3784 | §103 | Final Rejection | 77d overdue | Pending | Oct 26, 2023 |
| 18491479 | USER EXPERIENCE PLATFORM FOR CONNECTED FITNESS SYSTEMS | KENNEDY, JOSHUA T | 3784 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 138d overdue | Pending | Oct 20, 2023 |
| 18264366 | Heart Rate Monitor Systems And Methods | AKAR, SERKAN | 3797 | §103 | Final Rejection | 72d overdue | Pending | Aug 04, 2023 |
| 17909311 | EXERCISE INSTRUCTION AND FEEDBACK SYSTEMS AND METHODS | BIANCAMANO, ALYSSA N | 3715 | §103 | Final Rejection | 18d overdue | Pending | Sep 02, 2022 |
| 17385643 | CLUSTER BASED SEARCH AND RECOMMENDATION METHOD TO RAPIDLY ON-BOARD COMMANDS IN PERSONAL ASSISTANTS | CHANNAVAJJALA, SRIRAMA T | 2154 | §103 | Final Rejection | 141d overdue | Pending | Jul 26, 2021 |
| 16110108 | ROBUST REPLAY OF DIGITAL ASSISTANT OPERATIONS | SHALU, ZELALEM W | 2145 | §103 | Final Rejection | 9d overdue | Pending | Aug 23, 2018 |
| 16110103 | CROWDSOURCED TRAINING FOR COMMANDS MATCHING | SHALU, ZELALEM W | 2145 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 52d overdue | Pending | Aug 23, 2018 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial