Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/672,241

FORMING METHOD OF WATER-SOLUBLE PROTECTIVE FILM, AND PROCESSING METHOD OF PLATE-SHAPED OBJECT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 23, 2024
Priority
Jun 23, 2023 — JP 2023-103052
Examiner
SELLS, JAMES D
Art Unit
1745
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
DISCO Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
727 granted / 895 resolved
+16.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
910
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
54.4%
+14.4% vs TC avg
§102
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
§112
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 895 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Brady et al (US 2009/0258187). Regarding claims 1 and 3, Brady discloses a method for applying a protective coating onto a glass surface to protect it during transportation (paragraph [0002]). The coating may comprise high pH, aqueous soluble coating materials such as acrylic and acrylic acid copolymers, ethylene acrylic acid copolymers, methacrylate and methacrylic acid copolymers, cellulosic coatings, water-soluble polyester coatings, and other water soluble materials known in the art that can be removed using a water-based, non-abrasive cleaning method (see paragraph [0031]). It is the examiner’s position that such polymeric coating materials inherently have the same thermoplasticity as that claimed by the applicant. The coating is cured using heat (Table 2). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 and 4-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Brady et al (US 2009/0258187) as described above in view of Asai et al (US 2010/0080989). Regarding claims 2, 4 and 6-8, Asai discloses an adhesive coating material that contains a light-absorbing agent such as 0.01% by weight acetonitrile solution which absorbs laser light at a specific frequency (see claim 1). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art employ a laser light-absorbing agent, as taught by Asai, in the method of Brady in order to provide the predictable result of imparting desirable physical properties to the materials. Regarding claim 5, it is the examiner’s position that removing parts of the coating relates to a mere shape or form that is generally recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art, absent any showing of unexpected results. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES D SELLS whose telephone number is (571)272-1237. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 8:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phillip Tucker can be reached at 571-272-1095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JAMES D. SELLS Primary Examiner Art Unit 1745 /JAMES D SELLS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 23, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 09, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 10, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685012
LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679041
MANUFACTURING METHOD OF HOUSING AND APPARATUS HAVING THE SAME
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679045
SYSTEM FOR BONDING FILMS AND METHOD FOR PREPARING COMPOSITE FILM USING THE SAME
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12673469
RESIN COMPONENT AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667917
METHOD AND SYSTEM OF PRODUCING MICROSTRUCTURED COMPONENTS
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+12.0%)
2y 6m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 895 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month