Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/673,561

FLUORESCENT NANOPARTICLES FOR OILFIELD AND OTHER CHEMICAL PRODUCT INJECTION ASSURANCE, MONITORING AND TRACING

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 24, 2024
Examiner
STAFIRA, MICHAEL PATRICK
Art Unit
2877
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Championx LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
1110 granted / 1256 resolved
+20.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
1289
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
41.7%
+1.7% vs TC avg
§102
41.1%
+1.1% vs TC avg
§112
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1256 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 11, 13-15, 17, 21, 24, 26-29, 31, 33-34 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Group II, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on January 20, 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 5, 7, 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Moloney et al. (2017/0355628). Claim 1 Moloney et al. (2017/0355628) discloses a fluorescent treatment composition comprising (fluorescent water treatment compounds) from about 0.0001-5 wt % of a fluorescent nanoparticle (Para. 0055; 0.0001 wt % to about 5 wt %) comprising at least one of graphene quantum dots (Para. 0012-0013, 0024), carbon dots, carbonaceous nanomaterials, upconversion nanoparticles, noble metal nanoparticles, sol-gels, hydrophilic polymers, hydrogels, hydrophobic organic polymers, semiconducting polymer dots, dendrimers, silica nanoparticles, and doped and undoped nanoparticles with organic, metal-organic and metallic fluorophores (Para. 0012-0013, 0024). Moloney et al. (2017/0355628) further discloses and a treatment compound comprising an oilfield chemical, water treatment chemical, geothermal chemical, chemicals in gas, liquid and/or supercritical fluids lines and systems, or combinations thereof (Para. 0003, water treatment; Para. 0072, recovery crude oil). Moloney et al. (2017/0355628) further discloses wherein the composition luminesces at a determined wavelength between about 300 nm to about 1,000 nm when excited by light having a wavelength determined by the fluorescent nanoparticle (Para. 0098; 300nm – 550nm is within the claimed range). Claim 5 Moloney et al. (2017/0355628) discloses the oilfield chemical is selected from the group consisting of a corrosion inhibitor, biocide, scale inhibitor, hydrate inhibitor, paraffin inhibitor, asphaltene inhibitor, demulsifier, and foamer (Para. 0046; specifically, the fluorescent treatment compounds of FIG. 3 are fluorescent corrosion inhibitor compounds). Claim 7 Moloney et al. (2017/0355628) discloses the composition luminesces at a wavelength of about 600 nm to 700 nm when excited by light having a wavelength of about 500 nm (Para. 0099; using λ=500 nm as the excitation wavelength; peak emission intensity such as up to 650 nm.) Claim 9 Moloney et al. (2017/0355628) discloses the fluorescent nanoparticle is a graphene quantum dot (Para. 0036; graphene quantum dot) that is not functionalized and/or covalently bonded to the oilfield chemical(s) (Para. 0099, hydrocarbon oil, crude oil), and wherein the graphene quantum dot has a particle size from about 1 nm to 20 nm (Para. 0037; particle size 1 nm to 20 nm). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2, 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Moloney et al. (2017/0355628). Claim 2 Moloney et al. (2017/0355628) discloses the claimed invention except for an additive and/or adjuvant, wherein the additive and/or adjuvant is a solvent comprising from about 0.1 wt % to about 90 wt% of the composition. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to combine Moloney et al. (2017/0355628) with the concentration listed above since it was well known in the art that an additive and adjuvant is used to maximize the performance, stability, and application efficiency of the formulations, therefore improving stability by preventing components from separating, sinking or floating in different environments. Claim 6 Moloney et al. (2017/0355628) discloses the claimed invention except for the ratio of the fluorescent nanoparticle to the oilfield chemical(s) is about 1:10 to about 1:1 x1011 by weight, and wherein the oilfield chemical(s) comprises from about 0.01 wt% to about 99.9 wt% of the composition. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to combine Moloney et al. (2017/0355628) with the ratio and composition listed above since it was well known in the art that using such ranges in oilfields would provide extreme sensitivity of fluorescence detection in the vast dilution volumes encountered in subsurface reservoirs, therefore allowing ultra-high detection sensitivity, and cost-effective reservoir monitoring. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL PATRICK STAFIRA whose telephone number is (571)272-2430. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 6:30am-3pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tarifur Chowdhury can be reached at 571-272-2287. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL P STAFIRA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2877 February 10, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 24, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601589
MEASURING SYSTEM PROVIDING SHAPE FROM SHADING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12585898
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR APPLYING BAR CODES TO PELLET-SHAPED ARTICLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584795
POLARIMETRIC IMAGE SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578278
COMMUNICATION BETWEEN AN OPTICAL MEASURING DEVICE AND TWO MEASURING CELLS ACCOMMODATED THEREIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571716
PRE-SCAN FOCUS AND SCAN FOCUS METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+8.6%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1256 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month