Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/675,118

RAMP SIGNAL GENERATOR OF SWITCH MODE POWER SUPPLY

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 27, 2024
Priority
May 26, 2023 — provisional 63/504,477
Examiner
COMAS TORRES, YAHVEH
Art Unit
2838
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
MediaTek Singapore Pte. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
72 granted / 83 resolved
+18.7% vs TC avg
Minimal -6% lift
Without
With
+-6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
98
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
77.1%
+37.1% vs TC avg
§102
9.7%
-30.3% vs TC avg
§112
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 83 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 5/27/2024 seems to be in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: Paragraph 17, line 12 – “… M1 is coupled between the first node of the inductor L1 and a ground… “ should be “… M2 is coupled between the first node of the inductor L1 and a ground… “. Paragraph 30, line 11 – “… operational amplifier 805… “ should be “… operational amplifier 807… “ Appropriate correction is required. Election/Restrictions Claims 6-7 and 15-16 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species II and III as there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 3/23/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 9-10, 11 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fukushima US Publication 20220239228 (Fukushima). PNG media_image1.png 811 1068 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, Fukushima discloses a switch mode power supply (SMPS) (i.e., 10R) (Fig. 3), configured to receive an input voltage (i.e., Vin) (Fig. 3)to generate an output voltage (i.e., Vout) (Fig. 3), wherein the SMPS comprises: an inductor (i.e., L1) (Fig. 3); two power transistors (i.e., M1, M2) (Fig. 3), configured to selectively couple a first node of the inductor (i.e., L1) (Fig. 3) to an input voltage or a ground voltage; a driver (i.e., 290) (Fig. 3), configured to control the two power transistors (i.e., M1, M2) (Fig. 3) according to a pulse-width modulation (PWM) signal (see COT signal -paragraph 60); a capacitor (i.e., C1) (Fig. 3), coupled between a second node of the inductor (i.e., L1) (Fig. 3) and a ground voltage, wherein the second node of the inductor (i.e., L1) (Fig. 3) is configured to generate the output voltage (i.e., Vout) (Fig. 3); an error amplifier (i.e., 210) (Fig. 3), configured to compare the output voltage (i.e., Vout) (Fig. 3) with a reference voltage (i.e., Vref) (Fig. 3) to generate a comparison result; a PWM signal generator (see elements 260, 280) (Fig. 3), configured to receive the comparison result and a ramp signal to generate the PWM signal (for example see element 260 receiving ramp signal); and a ramp signal generator (i.e., 220) (Fig. 3), configured to generate the ramp signal according to the PWM signal (i.e., COT signal) (Fig. 3); wherein the ramp signal generator comprises: a filter (i.e., 240) (Fig. 3), configured to filter the PWM signal to generate a filtered PWM signal (i.e., Vctrl) (see paragraph 65); and a charge pump (for example see element 230, SW2, C2), configured to receive the PWM signal (i.e., COT) (Fig. 3) and the filtered PWM signal (i.e., Vctrl) (Fig. 3) to generate an output current, wherein the ramp signal (i.e., Vc2) (Fig. 3) is generated according to the output current. Regarding claim 2, Fukushima, as applied in linking claims, discloses the filter being a low-pass filter (for example see paragraph 79). Regarding claim 9, Fukushima, as applied in linking claims, discloses the charge pump working as a transconductance amplifier (for example see paragraph 63). Regarding claim 10, Fukushima, discloses a ramp signal generator of a switch mode power supply (SMPS) ((i.e., 220R) (Fig. 3),comprising: a filter (i.e., 240) (Fig. 3), configured to filter a pulse-width modulation (PWM) signal (i.e., COT) (Fig. 3) to generate a filtered PWM signal (i.e., Vctrl) (Fig. 3); and a charge pump (for example elements 230, SW2, C2) (Fig. 3), configured to receive the PWM signal (i.e., COT) (Fig. 3) and the filtered PWM signal (i.e., Vctrl) (Fig. 3) to generate an output current, wherein the output current is used to generate a ramp signal (i.e., Vc2) (Fig. 3), and the ramp signal is used for a PWM signal generator (for example see 260, 280) (Fig. 3) to generate the PWM signal (i.e., COT) (Fig. 3). Regarding claim 11, Fukushima, as applied in linking claims, disclose the filter being a low-pass filter (for example see paragraph 79). Regarding claim 18, Fukushima, as applied in linking claims, discloses the charge pump working as a transconductance amplifier (for example see paragraph 69). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 8 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fukushima US Publication 20220239228 (Fukushima) in view of Zhang US Patent 10826380 (Zhang). Regarding claim 8, Fukushima discloses the claimed invention, as applied above, but fail to disclose a charge pump with a low-pass filter at the output node. Zhang in the same field of endeavor discloses a charge pump with a low-pass filter (see elements R2, C2) (Fig. 2) at the output node in order to eliminate ripples to a voltage to be received by a comparator. Therefore, It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have optionally provide a charge pump with a low-pass filter at the output node in Fukushima, as taught by Zhang, in in order to eliminate ripples to a voltage to be received by a comparator. Regarding claim 17, Fukushima discloses the claimed invention, as applied above, but fail to disclose charge pump with a low-pass filter at the output node. Zhang in the same field of endeavor discloses a charge pump with a low-pass filter (see elements R2, C2) (Fig. 2) at the output node in order to eliminate ripples to a voltage to be received by a comparator. Therefore, It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have optionally provide a charge pump with a low-pass filter at the output node in Fukushima, as taught by Zhang, in in order to eliminate ripples to a voltage to be received by a comparator. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-5 and 12-14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 3, the prior art of record, as applied above, discloses the claimed invention but fail to disclose “a second current source, coupled between a ground voltage and the output node of the charge pump, configured to provide a second current to the output node of the charge pump; wherein the first switch is controlled by the PWM signal, and the second current source is controlled by the filtered PWM signal” in combination with all the recited elements of linking claims. Claims 4-5 depend on claim 3. Regarding claim 12, the Prior art of record, as applied above, discloses the claimed invention but fail to disclose “a second current source, coupled between a ground voltage and the output node of the charge pump, configured to provide a second current to the output node of the charge pump; wherein the first switch is controlled by the PWM signal, and the second current source is controlled by the filtered PWM signal” in combination with all the recited elements of linking claims. Claims 13-14 depend on claim 12. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YAHVEH COMAS TORRES whose telephone number is (571)272-4011. The examiner can normally be reached Mondays - Thursday 830am. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thienvu V Tran can be reached on (571)270-1276. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /YAHVEH COMAS TORRES/Examiner, Art Unit 2838 /THIENVU V TRAN/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676555
DUAL ACTIVE BRIDGE CONTROL TO MINIMIZE DC LINK RESONANCE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671348
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING SWITCH GATE LOGIC IN A POWER CONVERTER
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665515
POWER SUPPLY CONTROL SYSTEM FOR MULTI-PHASE POWER CONVERTER
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12647046
POWER CONVERTER CIRCUIT AND SEMICONDUCTOR MODULE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12633814
CONTROLLER FOR CONTROLLING PHASE-SHIFTED FULL-BRIDGE CIRCUIT, POWER SUPPLY MODULE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (-6.4%)
2y 5m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 83 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month