Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/675,253

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 28, 2024
Priority
Jun 02, 2023 — JP 2023-091842
Examiner
MIYOSHI, JESSE Y
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Japan Display Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
277 granted / 486 resolved
-3.0% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
547
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
50.7%
+10.7% vs TC avg
§102
22.2%
-17.8% vs TC avg
§112
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 486 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of embodiment 1 as shown in fig. 3 (claims 1-4 readable thereon, claims 5-12 withdrawn from consideration) in the reply filed on 7/28/2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. (US PGPub 2011/0148312; hereinafter “Zhang”) in view of Teshima et al. (US PGPub 2003/0132530; hereinafter “Teshima”). Re claim 1: Zhang teaches (e.g. figs. 5A, 5B) a display device comprising: a substrate (ceramic layer 304 and silicon layer 306; e.g. paragraph 54; hereinafter “S”) having a first main surface (upper surface of S; hereinafter “1MS”) on which a plurality of light emitting elements (LEDs 302-1 through 302-N; e.g. paragraph 54; hereinafter “LED”) spaced apart from each other are provided and a second main surface (bottom surface of S; hereinafter “2MS”) located on a side opposite to the first main surface (1MS); a cooling unit (heat sink 310; e.g. paragraph 53) having a third main surface (upper surface of 310; hereinafter “3MS”) and a fourth main surface (lower surface of 310; hereinafter “4MS”) located on a side opposite to the third main surface (3MS); a heat dissipation sheet (metal core layer 308; e.g. paragraph 53) located between the second main surface (2MS) and the third main surface (3MS) and in contact with the second main surface (2MS) and the third main surface (3MS). Zhang is silent as to explicitly teaching a connection portion arranged at a position sandwiching the heat dissipation sheet in a direction along the second main surface and bonded to each of the substrate and the cooling unit, wherein the connection portion is made of a heat shrinkable resin. Teshima teaches (e.g. fig. 5) a connection portion (mold resin 9; e.g. paragraph 32) arranged at a position sandwiching the heat dissipation sheet (308 of Zhang which corresponds to thermal coupler 33 of Teshima; e.g. paragraph 50) in a direction along the second main surface (2MS of Zhang) and bonded to each of the substrate (S of Zhang which corresponds to 2, 5 of Teshima) and the cooling unit (310 of Zhang which corresponds to 6 of Teshima), wherein the connection portion (9) is made of a heat shrinkable resin (molding resin 9 is made from an epoxy based resin; e.g. paragraph 38 of Teshima). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing, absent unexpected results, to use the molding resin surrounding the substrate, heat dissipation sheet, and cooling unit with a connection portion as taught by Teshima in the device of Zhang in order to have the predictable result of utilizing encapsulation of the device so that device lifetime and reliability can be improved. Re claim 2: Zhang in view of Teshima teaches the display device according to claim 1, wherein the connection portion (9 of Teshima) has an annular structure that surrounds (a pair of molds is used for the molding process, therefore the molding resin 9 would surround the periphery of the device; e.g. paragraph 38 of Teshima) a periphery of the heat dissipation sheet (308 of Zhang/33 of Teshima) in plan view. Re claim 3: Zhang in view of Teshima teaches the display device according to claim 1, wherein the connection portion (9 of Teshima) is in contact with each of the second main surface (2MS of Zhang which corresponds to upper surfaces of 1 and 5 of Teshima) and the third main surface (3MS of Zhang which corresponds to lower surface of 6 of Teshima). Re claim 4: Zhang in view of Teshima teaches the display device according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of light emitting elements constitute a display unit (LED-based display; see title of Zhang), and wherein each of the heat dissipation sheet (308) and the cooling unit (310) overlaps the display unit in plan view (fig. 5A shows overlap of the LEDs, 308, and 310 of Zhang). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JESSE Y MIYOSHI whose telephone number is (571)270-1629. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8:30AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jessica Manno can be reached at 571-272-2339. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JESSE Y MIYOSHI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 28, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741863
MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS PACKAGE WITH A LATERAL VENT HOLE CONNECTED TO A CAVITY AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733247
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING A FWD REGION FORMED ON A SUBSTRATE AND IGBT REGION FORMED ON THE SUBSTRATE
5y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12733188
METHOD AND STRUCTURE FOR DIODES WITH BACKSIDE CONTACTS
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727285
MULTI-WAVELENGTH LED STRUCTURES AND MANUFACTURING METHODS THEREOF
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12713683
GATE STRUCTURE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
4y 0m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+18.7%)
3y 7m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 486 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month