Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/675,501

LIGHT EMITTING DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 28, 2024
Priority
Aug 29, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0113686
Examiner
GHEYAS, SYED I
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
572 granted / 691 resolved
+14.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
726
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
55.4%
+15.4% vs TC avg
§102
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 691 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on May 28, 2024 was in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species I (claims 1-5, 7-13 and 15-21) in the reply filed on 08/28/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 11 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Choung et al. (Patent No.: US 11,552,143 B1). Regarding Claim 11, Choung et al. discloses a light emitting display device, comprising: a plurality of pixels on a substrate (Col. 4, L 65 - Col. 5, L 60; Figs. 1A-1D – substrate 102); a plurality of anode electrodes, each of the plurality of anode electrodes disposed at a corresponding one of the plurality of pixels (Col. 4, L 65 - Col. 5, L 60; Figs. 1A-1D – anode electrodes 104); PNG media_image1.png 276 606 media_image1.png Greyscale a first pixel defining layer between the plurality of anode electrodes (Col. 4, L 65 - Col. 5, L 60; Figs. 1A-1D – first pixel defining layer comprising layers 110 (non-conductive PDL structures) and 113 (inorganic layer)); a trench formed at a middle portion of the first pixel defining layer (Col. 5, L 61 - Col. 6, L 59; Figs. 1A-1D – trench 1106 (110B)); an emission layer disposed on the plurality of anode electrodes and the first pixel defining layer, the emission layer being separated between the plurality of anode electrodes by the trench (Col. 4, L 65 - Col. 5, L 60; Figs. 1A-1D – emission layer 106); and a cathode electrode disposed on the emission layer, the cathode electrode extending over all of the plurality of pixels and extending over the trench (Col. 4, L 65 - Col. 5, L 60; Figs. 1A-1D – cathode layer 108 disposed on emission layer 106, cathode layer 108 of all pixels are connected to a common cathode 120; cathode electrode at least partially extends over the trench 1106 (110B); see also Figs. 2A-2B which show more clearly that cathode 208, at least partially extends over the trench 210B).. Regarding Claim 13, Choung et al., as applied to claim 11, discloses the light emitting display device, further comprising: an emission area defined by an area of an anode electrode of the plurality of anode electrodes, the area being not covered by the first pixel defining layer (Figs. 1A-1D). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-5, 7-10, 20 and 21 are allowed. The following is an examiner's statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding Claim 1: The prior art of record to the examiner’s knowledge does not teach or render obvious the instant invention, particularly characterized by a light emitting display device, comprising: a lower anode electrode on a substrate; a first pixel defining layer covering middle areas of the lower anode electrode and exposing circumferential areas of the lower anode electrode; an anode electrode covering a top surface of the first pixel defining layer and connecting to the circumferential areas of the lower anode electrode; a second pixel defining layer exposing a top surface of the anode electrode and covering a side-wall surface of the anode electrode; a trench formed at the second pixel defining layer and disposed around the anode electrode; an emission layer on the anode electrode; and a cathode electrode on the emission layer. The most relevant prior art reference due to IM et al. (Pub. No.: US 2017/0170246 A1) substantially discloses a light emitting display device, comprising: a lower anode electrode on a substrate (Par. 0040; Fig. 3 – lower anode electrode 180); PNG media_image2.png 418 540 media_image2.png Greyscale a first pixel defining layer Par. 0040; Fig. 3 – first pixel defining layer 172); an anode electrode covering a top surface of the first pixel defining layer and connecting to the Par. 0040; Fig. 3 – anode electrode 200); a second pixel defining layer exposing a top surface of the anode electrode and covering a side-wall surface of the anode electrode (Par. 0040; Fig. 3 – second pixel defining layer 220); a trench formed at the second pixel defining layer and disposed around the anode electrode (Par. 0040; Fig. 3 – trench 230); an emission layer on the anode electrode (Par. 0040; Fig. 3 – emission layer 240); and a cathode electrode on the emission layer (Par. 0040; Fig. 3 – cathode electrode 250). This prior art, however, does not disclose a light emitting display device, comprising: a first pixel defining layer covering middle areas of the lower anode electrode and exposing circumferential areas of the lower anode electrode; an anode electrode covering a top surface of the first pixel defining layer and connecting to the circumferential areas of the lower anode electrode. Additionally, the prior arts made of record and not relied upon are considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See form PTO-892. However, none of these prior art references indicated above or the prior arts made of record in form PTO-892, disclose all the limitations of claim 1 (the individual limitations may be found in a plurality of prior arts but there is no motivation to combine). Because no reference alone teaches all the limitations, nor is there any motivation to combine the prior arts to construct all the limitations of this independent claim, claim 1 is deemed patentable over the prior arts. Regarding Claims 2-5 and 7-10: these claims are allowed because of their dependency status from claim 1. Regarding Claim 20: The prior art of record to the examiner’s knowledge does not teach or render obvious the instant invention, particularly characterized by a light emitting display device, comprising: a lower anode electrode disposed on a substrate, the lower anode electrode having a central portion and a circumferential portion; an upper anode electrode disposed on the lower anode electrode, the upper anode electrode being in contact with the circumferential portion of the lower anode electrode; a first pixel defining layer disposed between the lower anode electrode and the upper anode electrode, the first pixel defining layer located at least at the central portion of the lower anode electrode without covering the circumferential portion of the lower anode electrode; an emission layer on the upper anode electrode; and a cathode electrode on the emission layer. The most relevant prior art reference due to IM et al. (Pub. No.: US 2017/0170246 A1) substantially discloses a light emitting display device, comprising: a lower anode electrode disposed on a substrate, the lower anode electrode having a central portion and a circumferential portion (Par. 0040; Fig. 3 – lower anode electrode 180); an upper anode electrode disposed on the lower anode electrode, the upper anode electrode being in contact with Par. 0040; Fig. 3 – anode electrode 200); a first pixel defining layer disposed between the lower anode electrode and the upper anode electrode, the first pixel defining layer located at least at the central portion of the lower anode electrode Par. 0040; Fig. 3 – first pixel defining layer 172); PNG media_image2.png 418 540 media_image2.png Greyscale an emission layer on the upper anode electrode (Par. 0040; Fig. 3 – emission layer 240); and a cathode electrode on the emission layer (Par. 0040; Fig. 3 – cathode electrode 250). This prior art, however, does not disclose a light emitting display device, comprising: a light emitting display device, comprising: an upper anode electrode disposed on the lower anode electrode, the upper anode electrode being in contact with the circumferential portion of the lower anode electrode; a first pixel defining layer disposed between the lower anode electrode and the upper anode electrode, the first pixel defining layer located at least at the central portion of the lower anode electrode without covering the circumferential portion of the lower anode electrode.. Additionally, the prior arts made of record and not relied upon are considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See form PTO-892. However, none of these prior art references indicated above or the prior arts made of record in form PTO-892, disclose all the limitations of claim 20 (the individual limitations may be found in a plurality of prior arts but there is no motivation to combine). Because no reference alone teaches all the limitations, nor is there any motivation to combine the prior arts to construct all the limitations of this independent claim, claim 20 is deemed patentable over the prior arts. Regarding Claim 21: this claim is allowed because of its dependency status from claim 20. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 12 and 15-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kim (Pub. No.: US 2018/0166517 A1 – This prior art teaches a light emitting display device, comprising: a lower anode electrode (214) on a substrate; a first pixel defining layer (250) covering middle areas of the lower anode electrode and exposing circumferential areas of the lower anode electrode; an anode electrode (261) covering a top surface of the first pixel defining layer and connecting to the circumferential areas of the lower anode electrode; a second pixel defining layer (270) exposing a top surface of the anode electrode and covering a side-wall surface of the anode electrode; 262) on the anode electrode; and a cathode electrode (263) on the emission layer (Fig. 7). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SYED I GHEYAS whose telephone number is (571)272-0592. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday from 8:30 AM - 5:30 PM EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Britt Hanley, can be reached at telephone number (571)270-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal. Should you have questions about access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. 09/23/2026 /SYED I GHEYAS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 28, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772507
GATED BODY TRANSISTORS
3y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12757708
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT (IC) DEVICE WITH HYBRID METAL LAYER
4y 0m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12751053
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH ENHANCED AVALANCHE RUGGEDNESS
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748166
OPTICAL DETECTION DEVICE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING METHOD
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12751315
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+3.7%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 691 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month