Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/675,600

APPARATUS AND A PROCESS FOR STERILIZING AND RINSING CONTAINERS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
May 28, 2024
Priority
May 30, 2023 — IT 102023000010905
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Art Unit
1714
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Gea Procomac S P A
OA Round
2 (Final)
45%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
59%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 45% of resolved cases
45%
Career Allowance Rate
306 granted / 675 resolved
-19.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
710
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
63.5%
+23.5% vs TC avg
§102
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
§112
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 675 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Claims 1, 4 and 6-15 are pending, claims 2, 3 and 5 having been cancelled and claims 9-15 having been withdrawn. Applicant's response filed July 9, 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 1, 4 and 6-8 will be examined on the merits. Claim Objections The objection to claim 1 is withdrawn based on Applicant’s amendments to the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1, 4, 6 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP2003-137228A to Yamaguchi et al. (see machine translation) in view of U.S. Patent App. Pub. No. 2013/0092196 to Nagatani et al. As to claims 1 and 4, Yamaguchi discloses an apparatus for sterilizing and rinsing containers, comprising: a sterilizing unit configured to treat the contains by means of a sterilizing solution in a first tank, the sterilizing unit comprising a corresponding first rotating carousel (see Yamaguchi Fig. 3, ref.#4 and/or 6 showing a first rotating carousel, paragraph [0009]); a rinsing unit arranged downstream the sterilizing unit and configured to rinse the containers advancing along a curvilinear path with sterile water, the rinsing unit comprising a corresponding second rotating carousel (see Yamaguchi Fig. 3, ref.#7 and 8 showing a second rotating carousel; paragraph [0011]); a UHT device configured to provide sterile water to the rinsing unit (see Yamaguchi paragraph [0011] disclosing UHT sterile water); dispensing means in selective fluid communication with the UHT device so as to dispense a first amount of sterile water towards the containers in a first rinsing tract of the curvilinear path and a second amount of sterile water towards the containers in a second rinsing tract of the curvilinear path that is downstream of the first rinsing tract, the first rinsing tract and the second rinsing tract being arcuate portions of the curvilinear path (see Yamaguchi Fig. 3 disclosing pre-rinser 7 considered the first amount in a first rinsing tract of the path and rinser 8 considered the second amount in a second rinsing tract of the path that is downstream of the first rinsing tract and where the pre-rinser 7 and rinser 8 are rotating carousels which form the curvilinear path and contain arcuate portions along said curvilinear path; see paragraph [0011] disclosing the nozzles to spray the sterile water); and a recovery collector arranged at the second rinsing tract of the curvilinear path for collecting at least part of exhaust sterile water dropping from the containers advancing along the second rinsing tract, said recover collector being in selective fluid communication with the UHT device (see Yamaguchi paragraph [0017] disclosing that a portion of the water recovered from the rinser 8 (the second rinsing tract) can be fed to the UHT heater and used as part of the washing water for the pre-rinser 7). While Yamaguchi does not explicitly disclose selective fluid communication between the recovery collector and the UHT device, use of valves to control the flow is well known in the art and does not provide patentable significance. Yamaguchi does not explicitly disclose a further recovery collector arranged at the first rinsing tract of the path for collecting at least part of the exhaust sterile water dropping from the containers advancing along the first rinsing tract, said further recovery collector being in selective fluid communication with the first tank. Nagatani discloses a similar apparatus for sterilizing and rinsing containers wherein recovery collectors are arranged along the track for collecting at least part of the exhaust sterile water dropping from the containers and reusing the exhaust sterile water upstream in the track (see Nagatani Fig. 1, ref.#6A, 6B or 6C; paragraph [0033]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to modify Yamaguchi to include a further recovery collector arranged at the first rinsing tract of the path for collecting at least part of the exhaust sterile water dropping from the containers advancing along the first rinsing tract, said further recovery collector being in selective fluid communication with the first tank as suggested by Nagatani in order to reduce costs (see Nagatani paragraphs [0015]-[0016]). While Yamaguchi/Nagatani does not explicitly disclose selective fluid communication between the further recovery collector and the first tank, use of valves to control the flow is well known in the art and does not provide patentable significance. Furthermore, the combination of Yamaguchi and Nagatani discloses that the recovery collector and the further recovery collector can be separate and have distinct piping systems configured to establish fluid communication respectively between the first recovery track and the second recovery track (see Nagatani Fig. 1 disclosing multiple recovery collectors 6A, 6B and 6C as well as separate and distinct piping systems (see piping system between recovery tanks 6A, 6B and 6C to the pumps 7A, 7B, and 7C and to the next upstream stage)). As to claim 6, the combination of Yamaguchi and Nagatani discloses that the sterilizing unit and the rinsing unit can comprise a corresponding linear conveyor or belt (see Nagatani Fig. 2). As to claim 8. the combination of Yamaguchi and Nagatani discloses that both the pre-rinser and the rinsing device supplies sterile water to the containers for 2 to 3 seconds (see Yamaguchi paragraph [0016]) and thus it is reasonably expected that the dispensing means is configured to dispense the sterile water by a single dispensing pulse which supplies both the first amount of sterile water and the second amount of sterile water. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP2003-137228A to Yamaguchi et al. (see machine translation) in view of U.S. Patent App. Pub. No. 2013/0092196 to Nagatani et al. as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of U.S. Patent App. Pub. No. 2016/0185584 to Hayakawa et al. Yamaguchi and Nagatani are relied upon as discussed above with respect to the rejection of claim 1. As to claim 7, the combination of Yamaguchi and Nagatani does not explicitly disclose a second tank arranged downstream of the UHT device so as to receive the sterile water from it, said second tank being configured to supply the sterile water to the dispensing means. Hayakawa discloses that it is known in the art to have a tank after a UHT device (see, e.g., Hayakawa Fig. 5 disclosing UHT 18 and tank 11). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to include a tank downstream of the UHT device as is known in the art and the results would have been predictable (storing of sterilized liquid). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed July 9, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regarding Applicant’s arguments directed to the newly added limitations regarding the curvilinear path, the cited prior art discloses that the path of the containers is along a series of rotating carousels as discussed above. Since the carousels are circular, the path would therefore be comprised of arcs along the path and as such would meet the claim recitation of a curvilinear path (where it is understood that curvilinear path means a curved line path). Regarding Applicant’s arguments directed to the further recovery collector arranged at the first rinsing tract of the curvilinear path, as discussed in the rejection above, Nagatani discloses a similar apparatus for sterilizing and rinsing containers wherein recovery collectors are arranged along the track for collecting at least part of the exhaust sterile water dropping from the containers and reusing the exhaust sterile water upstream in the track (see Nagatani Fig. 1, ref.#6A, 6B or 6C; paragraph [0033]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to modify Yamaguchi to include a further recovery collector arranged at the first rinsing tract of the path for collecting at least part of the exhaust sterile water dropping from the containers advancing along the first rinsing tract, said further recovery collector being in selective fluid communication with the first tank as suggested by Nagatani in order to reduce costs (see Nagatani paragraphs [0015]-[0016]). It is noted that Nagatani discloses numerous recovery collectors along the path to recover cleaning solution in order to reuse it (see Nagatani Fig. 1 disclosing recovering solution from 8B into recovery tank 6C to reuse into 8A, recovering solution from 5C into recovery tank 6A to reuse into 5B and recovering solution from 5B into recovery tank to reuse into 5A). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DOUGLAS LEE whose telephone number is (571)270-3296. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kaj Olsen can be reached at 571-272-1344. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DOUGLAS LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1714
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 28, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 09, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747412
EFFICIENT SURFACTANT SYSTEM ON PLASTIC AND ALL TYPES OF WARE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746582
VACUUM CLEANER AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A VACUUM CLEANER
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741467
MAINTENANCE METHOD AND IMAGE RECORDING DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741809
Sanitary Device and Pest Prevention Device for Garbage Can Lids
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12714108
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR MICROBIAL INHIBITING
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
45%
Grant Probability
59%
With Interview (+13.7%)
3y 6m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 675 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month