Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/676,088

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PALLET RACKING SUPPORT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 28, 2024
Examiner
HIJAZ, OMAR F
Art Unit
3635
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Level-Up Racking Co.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allowance Rate
433 granted / 781 resolved
+3.4% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+35.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
830
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
93.4%
+53.4% vs TC avg
§102
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
§112
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 781 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This communication is a first Office Action Non-Final rejection on the merits. The Restriction election received on 05/08/2026 has been acknowledged. Claims 1-21 are now pending and have been considered below. Election/Restrictions 1. Applicant’s election of Group I (claims 1-11) in the reply filed on 05/08/2026 is acknowledged. 2. Claims 12-21 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to nonelected invention Groups II-III. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 05/08/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-11, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Keck (U.S. Patent No. 9,545,150) in view of Badenhorst et al. (AU 2013100181 A4). Regarding claim 1, Keck teaches a pallet racking support system (abstract), the system comprising: vertical components (110, 140) coupled to a floor of a facility (figure 3); horizontal components (200, 210) coupled to the vertical components (figure 3), the vertical components and the horizontal components together forming storage spaces (figure 3) capable of receiving pallets. Keck does not specifically disclose refrigeration components located on a roof of a refrigerated facility; wherein the vertical components extend through the roof of the refrigerated facility to couple to the refrigeration components; and thermal and moisture barriers applied to penetration regions between the refrigeration components and the roof. Badenhorst et al. discloses refrigeration components located on a roof of a refrigerated facility (HVAC on a roof; abstract); wherein the vertical components (62-64) extend through the roof of the refrigerated facility (figure 9) to couple to the refrigeration components (at 60); and thermal and moisture barriers (roof sheeting; col. 4, lines 33-36) applied to penetration regions between the refrigeration components and the roof ([not labeled]; figure 10). Therefore, from the teaching of Badenhorst et al., it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the facility of Keck to include refrigeration components located on a roof of a refrigerated facility; wherein the vertical components extend through the roof of the refrigerated facility to couple to the refrigeration components; and thermal and moisture barriers applied to penetration regions between the refrigeration components and the roof, as taught by Badenhorst et al., in order to provide cooling to a facility that requires a design temperature, without occupying a footprint within the facility to maximize storage space within the facility, and improve workability and mobility within the facility. Regarding claim 2, Keck teaches the pallet rack support system is located within the facility (figure 3). Regarding claim 3, Badenhorst et al. in the combination discloses the pallet rack support system supports a weight of the refrigeration components positioned on the roof of the refrigerated facility (it is understood that the support system of Keck would support a weight of the refrigeration components of Badenhorst et al. positioned on the roof of the refrigerated facility). Regarding claim 4, Badenhorst et al. in the combination discloses the pallet rack support system supports a static load of the refrigeration components positioned on the roof of the refrigerated facility (it is understood that the pallet rack support system of Keck would support a static load of the refrigeration components of Badenhorst et al. positioned on the roof of the refrigerated facility). Regarding claim 5, Badenhorst et al. in the combination discloses the pallet rack support system is configured to accommodate additional weight from the refrigeration components (it is understood that the pallet rack support system of Keck would accommodate additional weight from the refrigeration components of Badenhorst et al.). Regarding claim 6, Badenhorst et al. in the combination discloses the vertical components are coupled to the refrigeration components through an upper terminus of the vertical components (figures 8 and 10). Regarding claim 7, Keck teaches the vertical components comprise vertical beams (figure 3). Regarding claim 8, Keck teaches the horizontal components comprise horizontal shelves (figure 3). Regarding claim 9, Keck teaches the vertical components comprise steel (steel; col. 4, line 28). Regarding claim 10, Keck teaches the vertical components comprise at least one of tubular steel, angular steel, or structural steel (steel; col. 4, line 28). Regarding claim 11, Keck teaches the horizontal components comprise steel (steel; col. 4, line 28). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The cited patents listed on the included form PTO-892 further show the state of the art with respect to pallet racking support in general. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OMAR HIJAZ whose telephone number is (571)270-5790. The examiner can normally be reached on 8-6 EST Monday-Friday. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Mattei can be reached on (571) 270-3238. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OMAR F HIJAZ/Examiner, Art Unit 3633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 28, 2024
Application Filed
May 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680330
Multimedia Tombstone Device
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668986
APPARATUS FOR SECURING POLE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662841
SYSTEMS FOR INSTALLING AN ELONGATED STAKE TO A SUPPORT POST TO PROVIDE STURDINESS TO THE SUPPORT POST, AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12624541
A BUILDING SYSTEM
3y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624510
ANCHOR
2y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+35.4%)
2y 10m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 781 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month