Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/676,545

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH AN ACTIVE DEVICE REGION AND A CURRENT SENSOR REGION

Final Rejection §103
Filed
May 29, 2024
Priority
Jun 19, 2023 — DE 102023205705.0
Examiner
AHMADI, MOHSEN
Art Unit
2896
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Infineon Technologies AG
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
410 granted / 472 resolved
+18.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
501
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
51.4%
+11.4% vs TC avg
§102
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
§112
15.3%
-24.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 472 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Applicants’ response of 09/08/2026 has been entered in the record and considered. With respect to the rejection claims 35 USC 102 (a)(1) is withdrawn in view of applicants’ amendments. Applicants added new claims 21-34 are added. New independent claims 21-25 are rejected. Claims 1-21 and newly added claims 26-34 are allowed as these claims include the limitations of the previously objected allowable claims. Claims 1-34 are under consideration. Claims 21-25 are rejected. Claims 1-20 and newly added claims 26-34 are allowed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim 21 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Pub # 2010/0320461 to Su et al. (SU) in view of US Pub # 2016/0343702 to Tomita et al. (Tomita). Regarding independent claim 21, Su discloses a semiconductor device (Fig. 4H), comprising: a semiconductor substrate (Fig. 4H: 402); an active device region (see Examiner’s Mark-up below) comprising a plurality of gate trenches (403A and 403B) formed at a first main surface of the semiconductor substrate (402); a current sensor region (see Examiner’s Mark-up below) comprising a plurality of gate trenches (405A and 405B) formed at the first main surface of the semiconductor substrate (402); and a transition region (see Examiner’s Mark-up below) arranged between the active device region and the current sensor region, wherein the transition region comprises a supplementary trench (406) formed at the first main surface of the semiconductor substrate (402), wherein the supplementary trench (406) separates the plurality of gate trenches (403A and 403B) of the active device region from the plurality of gate trenches (405A and 405B) of the current sensor region, wherein an electrode (408 and ¶0035) formed in the supplementary trench (406) is neither electrically connected (¶0037) to gate electrodes (408) formed in the plurality of gate trenches (403A and 403B) of the active device region nor electrically connected to gate electrodes (408) formed in the plurality of gate trenches (405A and 405B) of the current sensor region (see ¶0037), (¶0037 explicitly discloses “The P-type dopants 412 proximate the isolation trench 406 form body rings that help provide electrical isolation between the main FET and the sense FET”), wherein the semiconductor device further comprises: an emitter/source pad (Fig. 4H: 421) formed over the semiconductor substrate (402) and electrically connected to a source region (413 and ¶0037) formed in the active device region; a sense pad (Fig. 4H: 422) formed over the semiconductor substrate and electrically connected to a source region (414) formed in the current sensor region; and a gate pad (Fig. 4H: 420) formed over the semiconductor substrate and electrically connected to the gate electrodes (408) of the active device region and to the gate electrodes (408) of the current sensor region (see ¶0038 and Fig. 4G). Su does not expressly disclose: a temperature sensor region comprising a temperature sensor device, wherein a first terminal of the temperature sensor device is electrically connected to the sense pad. However, Tomita teaches a temperature sensor region (94) comprising a temperature sensor device (including first sense electrode 51, second sense electrode 52, and temperature-dependent resistance layer 50), wherein a first terminal (first sense electrode 51) of the temperature sensor device provides an electrical connection for temperature sensing (see Figs. 1 and 6 and ¶0037, 0043 -0044 of Tomita). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the temperature sensor region (94) of Tomita into the semiconductor device of Su to monitor temperature conditions affecting the current-sensing performance of the semiconductor device. In the proposed modification, the first terminal (51) of Tomita’s temperature sensor device would be electrically connected to the existing sense pad (422) of Su, thereby providing a common sensing terminal for the current sensor and the temperature sensor. PNG media_image1.png 412 761 media_image1.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 and 26-34 are allowed. Amended independent claim 1 and newly added independent claims 26 and 27 are allowed because these claims have been amended to incorporate the previously dependent claims 3, 11 and 13, respectively. The examiner’s reasons for independent claims 1 and newly added independent claims, 26 and 27 and their respective dependent claims are of record in June 17, 2026 Office action. Claims 22-25 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 22 recites: “wherein the semiconductor device is configured to allow for a measurement of a current in the current sensor region using the sense pad when the gate pad is switched to a first state, and wherein the semiconductor device is further configured to allow for a measurement of a temperature of the semiconductor device using the sense pad when the gate pad is switched to a second state.” Claim 24 recites: “wherein a second terminal of the temperature sensor device is electrically connected to the emitter/source pad.” Claim 25 recites: “wherein the temperature sensor device comprises a plurality of diodes coupled in series.” Response to Arguments Applicant’s response filed September 8, 2026, has been entered and considered. The rejection of claims 1 and 2 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) is withdrawn in view of Applicant’s amendments. Amended independent claim 1 is allowable because the claim, including the limitation incorporated from former claim 3, has been determined to define patentable subject matter. Claims 1-20 and 26-34 are allowed. Claims 21-25 remain rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 for the reasons set forth below. Applicant’s arguments regarding independent claim 21 have been considered. Applicant argues that Tomita does not disclose a terminal of the temperature sensor device electrically connected to the same sense pad associated with the current sensor region of Su. The Examiner respectfully disagrees to the extent that Applicant’s argument addresses only the individual disclosures of the references rather than the proposed combination under 35 U.S.C. 103. Specifically, Su teaches a sense pad (422) electrically connected to the source region (414) of the current sensor region (Fig. 4H). Tomita teaches a temperature sensor region (94) comprising a temperature sensor device having first and second sense electrodes (51, 52), wherein the temperature is detected based on temperature-dependent electrical characteristics (Figs. 1 and 6; ¶0037 and 0043-0044). The proposed combination provides for electrically connecting the first sense electrode (51) of Tomita to the existing sense pad (422) of Su, such that the sense pad (422) serves as a common electrical connection for the current sensor region and the temperature sensor device. Accordingly, the rejection does not rely on Tomita individually disclosing the sense pad (422) of Su, but rather on the proposed combination of the teachings of Su and Tomita under 35 U.S.C. 103. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US Pub # 2020/0335622 to Hiyoshi, US Pub # 2018/0277641 to Karmous, US Pub # 2017/0179278 to Baldwin et al., US Pub # 2024/0014300 to Osawa. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOHSEN AHMADI whose telephone number is (571)272-5062. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:00am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William F Kraig can be reached at 571-272-8660. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MOHSEN AHMADI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2896
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 08, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 14, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772584
SOLID-STATE IMAGING DEVICE PACKAGE MANUFACTURING METHOD AND SOLID-STATE IMAGING DEVICE PACKAGE
3y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12765407
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE
3y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12764958
THREE-DIMENSIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 7m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12764922
SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12757588
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+9.5%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 472 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month