Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/676,715

ELECTRIC WORK VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 29, 2024
Priority
Dec 24, 2021 — JP 2021-211646 +2 more
Examiner
GURARI, EREZ
Art Unit
3615
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Kubota Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
742 granted / 950 resolved
+26.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
959
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
48.9%
+8.9% vs TC avg
§102
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§112
16.9%
-23.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 950 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Japanese patent document 18,676,715 (hence ‘715), as provided by applicant. In re claim 1, ‘715 teaches an electric work vehicle, comprising: a body (par. 2-3); a travel device to cause the body to travel (par. 25-35m “traveling body”); an operation mechanism to transmit power to a work device (par. 27-35, “traveling body”); a motor to rotate at least one of the travel device and the operation mechanism (motor 13 and 31); a battery to supply electric power to the motor (par. 1-5, “energy storage device”); an inverter to convert a direct current from the battery into an alternating current and supply the alternating current to the motor (“inverter”, 42); and an electrically-conductive cable electrically connected to the inverter and the motor to provide the alternating current to the motor (par. 55-65, “assist power generation motor cable” 46); the inverter including: an inverter module to convert the direct current into the alternating current (that’s what inverters do); a case to house the inverter module (par. 28-35, “inverter housing unit 34”); and a first connector projecting outwardly from a surface of the case and electrically connected to the electrically-conductive cable (par. 28-35, “assist power generation motor cable”, 46); the first connector being provided on the surface of the case that is on an opposite side to a side where the battery is located, so as to project toward the opposite side (fig. 3). ‘715 differs in that it doesn’t teach the battery and the inverter being adjacent to each other. Nonetheless, the examiner takes the position that placing them adjacent to each other would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention as an obvious matter of design choice. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EREZ GURARI whose telephone number is (571)270-1156. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00AM-6:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marc Jimenez can be reached at (571) 272-4530. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EREZ GURARI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3615
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 29, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740912
WALKER APPARATUS WITH LIFTING PLATFORM
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734007
CART FOR OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735083
WASHOUT RECLAIMING SYSTEM HAVING A WHEELBARROW
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738585
Energy Storage Floor Assembly for a Motor Vehicle, in Particular for a Passenger Car, and Motor Vehicle
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728797
DEPLOYABLE RUNNING BOARD WITH STRUCTURAL AND STEP INTEGRATION
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+10.6%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 950 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month