Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/677,225

ZERO TURN STEERABLE FRONT END WITH SINGLE MOTOR

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 29, 2024
Examiner
LAGUARDA, GONZALO
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Mtd Products Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
503 granted / 694 resolved
+2.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
755
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§103
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
§102
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
§112
25.3%
-14.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 694 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, 5-7, 9, 11-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Inagaki (U.S. Pat. No. 5,154,437). Regarding claim 1 and 7, Inagaki discloses a vehicle, comprising: a frame (24); two drive elements coupled to the frame, wherein the two drive elements are configured to be driven independently of each other (abstract); steering controls (6) configured to receive an operator input; and a steering system, comprising: a first steerable wheel (1 on the right of fig. 5) coupled to a first wheel gear (shown between 2 and 1 in fig. 5 on the right) and a second steerable wheel (1 on the left of fig. 5) coupled to a second wheel gear (shown between 2 and 1 in fig. 5 on the left); a steering motor (5) controller configured to receive an input signal based at least in part on the operator input and to generate a motor control signal based on the input signal; and a steering motor (5) configured to rotate a driven steering gear (2 on the right) based on the motor control signal, wherein the driven steering gear is mechanically linked (3) to a linked steering gear (2 on the left) such that the linked steering gear is configured to rotate with the driven steering gear, wherein the driven steering gear is coupled to the first wheel gear (shown between 2 and 1 in fig. 5 on the right) such that rotation of the driven steering gear rotates the first wheel gear and the first steerable wheel to a first angle, and wherein the linked steering gear is coupled to the second wheel gear (shown between 2 and 1 in fig. 5 on the left) such that rotation of the linked steering gear rotates the second wheel gear and the second steerable wheel to a second angle. Regarding claim 3 and 9 which depends from claim 1 and 7 respectively, Inagaki discloses wherein, when the first angle and the second angle are non-zero, the first angle is one of greater or lesser than the second angle (shown clearly in fig. 4 which is discussed as a possible combination in col. 5, lines 45-47). Regarding claim 5 and 11 which depends from claim 1 and 7 respectively, Inagaki discloses wherein the driven steering gear is mechanically linked to the linked steering gear via a panhard bar (shown in fig. 5 3 is the bar which provides lateral movement which is the function of a panhard bar). Regarding claim 6 and 12 which depends from claim 1 and 7 respectively, Inagaki discloses wherein the input signal is based at least in part on a speed of the vehicle (col. 4, lines 10-18). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2, 4, 8, 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Inagaki (U.S. Pat. No. 5,154,437) as applied to claims 1, 3, 7, 9 above, and in view of Schaedler (U.S. Pat. No. 7,992,659). Regarding claim 2 and 8 which depends from claim 1 and 7 respectively, Inagaki does not disclose wherein the driven steering gear, the linked steering gear, the first wheel gear, and the second wheel gear are non-circular gears. Schaedler, which deals in steering, teaches wherein the driven steering gear, the linked steering gear, the first wheel gear, and the second wheel gear are non-circular gears (col. 3, lines 46-53). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have modified Inagaki with the gears of Schaedler because this allows for gears that define the desired turn radius (col. 3, liens 46-53). Regarding claim 4 and 10 which depends from claim 3 and 9 respectively, Schaedler discloses wherein the combination of the first angle and the second angle provide Ackermann steering for the vehicle (col. 7, lines 64-67). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Please review when considering a response to this office action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GONZALO LAGUARDA whose telephone number is (571)272-5920. The examiner can normally be reached 8-5 M-Th Alt. F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Logan Kraft can be reached at (571) 270-5065. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. GONZALO LAGUARDA Primary Examiner Art Unit 3747 email: gonzalo.laguarda@uspto.gov /GONZALO LAGUARDA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 29, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594921
ELECTROMECHANICAL BRAKE PRESSURE GENERATOR INCLUDING AN ANTI-TWIST PROTECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589738
VEHICLE-TRAVELING CONTROL SYSTEM AND VEHICLE-TRAVELING CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583518
METHOD FOR OPERATING A PARKING ASSISTANCE SYSTEM, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT, PARKING ASSISTANCE SYSTEM AND VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12565191
VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE AND VEHICLE CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12559116
VEHICLE FOR PREGNANT WOMAN AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+7.0%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 694 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month