Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/683,961

PHOTOSENSITIVE RESIN COMPOSITION, MANUFACTURING METHOD OF ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 15, 2024
Priority
Aug 20, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2021030570
Examiner
CHAMPION, RICHARD DAVID
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
45%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
55%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 45% of resolved cases
45%
Career Allowance Rate
56 granted / 125 resolved
-15.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
172
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
62.0%
+22.0% vs TC avg
§102
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 125 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 1. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 2. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: 3. A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 4. Claims 1-6 and 8-13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Ide et al. (World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) WO 2020/196764 A1), hereinafter Ide. 5. Regarding Claims 1-6 and 8-13, Ide teaches (Paragraphs [0123 and 0131-0168], Table 1, Claims 1-15) a photosensitive resin composition, therein a negative photosensitive resin composition. Ide teaches (Paragraphs [0123 and 0131-0171], Table 1, Claims 1-15) the photosensitive resin composition comprising a polyimide resin. Ide teaches (Paragraphs [0123 and 0131-0171], Table 1, Claims 1-15) wherein, in a case where a cured film obtained by heating the photosensitive resin composition at 170°C for 2 hours is subjected to a dynamic viscoelasticity measurement under the following conditions, a storage elastic modulus E'220 at 220°C is 0.5 to 3.0 GPa, [conditions] frequency: 1 Hz, temperature: 30°C to 300°C, heating rate: 5 °C/min, measurement mode: tensile mode. Herein, MPEP § 2112.01(I) states: “Where the claimed and prior art products are identical or substantially identical in structure or composition, or are produced by identical or substantially identical processes, a prima facie case of either anticipation or obviousness has been established. In re Best, 562 F.2d 1252, 1255, 195 USPQ 430, 433 (CCPA 1977).” Furthermore, MPEP § 2112.01(II) states: “’Products of identical chemical composition can not have mutually exclusive properties.’ In re Spada, 911 F.2d 705, 709, 15 USPQ2d 1655, 1658 (Fed. Cir. 1990). A chemical composition and its properties are inseparable. Therefore, if the prior art teaches the identical chemical structure, the properties applicant discloses and/or claims are necessarily present. Id.” Thus, given that the photosensitive resin composition of Claim 1 of the chemical composition merely comprises a polyimide resin and/or polyamide resin and Ide teaches a photosensitive resin composition comprising a polyimide resin, a prima facie case of anticipation has been established with regards to wherein a cured film from the photosensitive resin composition and its subsequent dynamic viscoelasticity measurement. Ide teaches (Paragraphs [0123 and 0131-0171], Table 1, Claims 1-15) wherein, in a case where a glass transition temperature of the cured film is denoted as Tg [°C], a coefficient of thermal expansion of the cured film in a temperature region from Tg - 50 [°C] to Tg - 20 [°C] is denoted as CTE1, and a coefficient of thermal expansion of the cured film in a temperature region from Tg + 20 [°C] to Tg + 50 [°C] is denoted as CTE2, a value of CTE2/CTE1 is 1 to 10. See above with regards to the dynamic viscoelasticity measurement of a cured film formed from a photosensitive resin composition and said rationale extends to the measurement of glass transition temperature. Ide teaches (Paragraphs [0123 and 0131-0171], Table 1, Claims 1-15) wherein the photosensitive resin composition contains a polyimide resin having an imide ring structure, therein a maleimide structure or any of diamine compounds 1-3. Ide teaches (Paragraphs [0123 and 0131-0171], Table 1, Claims 1-15) the photosensitive resin composition further comprising a polyfunctional (meth)acrylate compound, therein tris (2-acryloyloxyethyl) isocyanurate. Ide teaches (Paragraphs [0123 and 0131-0171], Table 1, Claims 1-15) the photosensitive resin composition further comprising a photosensitizing agent, therein a photopolymerization initiator (C) and a photoradical polymerization initiator, such as ("Omnirad 184"). Ide teaches (Paragraphs [0123 and 0131-0171], Table 1, Claims 1-15) the photosensitizing agent includes a photoradical generator, therein a photopolymerization initiator (C) and a photoradical polymerization initiator, such as ("Omnirad 184"). Ide teaches (Paragraphs [0123 and 0131-0171], Table 1, Claims 1-15) the photosensitive resin composition further comprising an epoxy resin, therein 3',4'-epoxycyclohexylmethyl-3,4-epoxycyclohexylmethyl-3,4-epoxycyclohexanecarboxylate. Ide teaches (Paragraphs [0123 and 0131-0171], Table 1, Claims 1-15) the photosensitive resin composition wherein the polyamide resin and/or the polyimide resin is dissolved in a solvent, therein propylene glycol-1-monomethyl ether-2-acetate (PGMEA), to be in a form of a varnish. Ide teaches (Paragraphs [0123 and 0131-0171], Table 1, Claims 1-15) the photosensitive resin composition is used for forming an insulating layer in an electronic device, therein an insulating cured film in a semiconductor, a display, an electronic circuit board, or the like. Ide teaches (Paragraphs [0123 and 0131-0171], Table 1, Claims 1-15) a manufacturing method of an electronic device. Ide teaches (Paragraphs [0123 and 0131-0171], Table 1, Claims 1-15) the manufacturing method of an electronic device comprising a film forming step of forming a photosensitive resin film over a substrate using the photosensitive resin composition. Ide teaches (Paragraphs [0123 and 0131-0171], Table 1, Claims 1-15) the manufacturing method of an electronic device comprising an exposure step of exposing the photosensitive resin film. Ide teaches (Paragraphs [0123 and 0131-0171], Table 1, Claims 1-15) the manufacturing method of an electronic device comprising a development step of developing the exposed photosensitive resin film. Ide teaches (Paragraphs [0123 and 0131-0171], Table 1, Claims 1-15) the manufacturing method of an electronic device comprising a thermosetting step of heating and curing the exposed photosensitive resin film after the development step, therein post-baking. Ide teaches (Paragraphs [0123 and 0131-0171], Table 1, Claims 1-15) the manufacturing method of an electronic device comprising a cured film of the photosensitive resin composition. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 6. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: 7. A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 8. Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ide et al. (World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) WO 2020/196764 A1), hereinafter Ide, in view of Kawabata et al. (World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) WO 2017/104672 A1), hereinafter Kawabata. 9. Regarding Claim 7, Ide teaches all limitations of Claim 1 above. However, Ide fails to explicitly teach the photosensitive resin composition further comprising a thermal radical initiator. 10. Ide teaches (Abstract, Claim 15) a photosensitive resin composition comprising a polyimide that coats a substrate, irradiated, and developed. Kawabata teaches (Paragraphs [0084 and 0264]) a photosensitive resin composition comprising a polyimide that coats a substrate, irradiated, and developed. Kawabata teaches (Paragraphs [0197-0198]) a thermal radical initiator, therein a thermal radical polymerization initiator. Kawabata teaches (Paragraph [0197]) the use of a thermal radical initiator results in an increased heat resistance. 11. It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Ide to incorporate the teachings of Kawabata wherein the photosensitive resin composition further comprises a thermal radical initiator. Doing so would result in improved heat resistance, as recognized by Kawabata. Conclusion 12. Any inquiry concerning this communication should be directed to RICHARD D CHAMPION at telephone number (571) 272-0750. The examiner can normally be reached on 8 a.m. - 5 p.m. Mon-Fri EST. 13. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KEITH D HENDRICKS can be reached at (571) 272-1401. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. 14. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal. Should you have questions about access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). 15. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. /RICHARD DAVID CHAMPION/Examiner, Art Unit 1737
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 15, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704778
RESIST UNDERLAYER COMPOSITIONS AND PATTERN FORMATION METHODS USING SUCH COMPOSITIONS
7y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704783
METHOD FOR PREPARING PIXEL DEFINE LAYER
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699318
Onium Salt, Resist Composition, And Patterning Process
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692335
PHOTOSENSITIVE POLYMER AND RESIST COMPOSITION HAVING THE SAME
4y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12645139
FREE-RADICALLY POLYMERIZABLE COMPOUNDS, COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING THE SAME, POLYMERIZED COMPOUNDS, METHODS OF MAKING AND ARTICLES INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
45%
Grant Probability
55%
With Interview (+9.9%)
3y 10m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 125 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month