Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/684,797

MOTOR VEHICLE WITH REAR IMPACT FORCE RECOVERY BY A TRACTION BATTERY TRAY

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Feb 19, 2024
Examiner
MEYER, JACOB B
Art Unit
3613
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Stellantis Auto SAS
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
562 granted / 754 resolved
+22.5% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
768
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
42.5%
+2.5% vs TC avg
§102
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§112
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 754 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the two tabs" in the last line of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Perhaps this claim should depend from claim 4. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a2 as being anticipated by PSA Automobiles (WO 2021/038157) [hereinafter as PSA; provided by Applicant]. Regarding claim 1, PSA discloses (paragraphs 29-41, claims, figures) a motor vehicle (1, figs) comprising: a structure with a floor (side rails 3, floor, claims, figures); a tray (5) for electrical traction energy accumulators, arranged under the floor (claim 1, figs) and comprising two side profile members (outer side members 25, figs); a rear drive unit (cradle 7, figs) arranged at the rear of the tray and attached to the structure by attachment means (at least reinforcing lugs of paragraph 30, figs); wherein the attachment means are further attached to each of the two side profile members via a connecting piece, respectively (lug 17 attached to outer side member 25, paragraph 35, figs). Regarding claim 10, PSA discloses wherein each of the side profile members is an extruded rectilinear profile with a cross-section forming a plurality of cavities (at least figs 1 and 2). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-5, 7-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 6 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the prior art when taken alone or in combination does not appear to teach or fairly suggest at this time the motor vehicle of claim 1, wherein the attachment means comprise at each lateral side of the motor vehicle: a core attached to the structure; a ring surrounding the core and connected to the rear drive unit; an elastomer connecting the core and the ring; each of the connecting pieces being attached to one of the cores; the motor vehicle according to claim 1 wherein each of the connecting pieces comprises a tab with a front end attached to the corresponding side profile member and a rear end attached to the attachment means; the motor vehicle according to claim 1, comprising, at each lateral side of the motor vehicle, a piece for attaching the tray to the structure, respectively, each of said attachment pieces being adjacent to the corresponding side profile member and having an upper face attached to said structure; the motor vehicle according to claim 1, wherein the rear drive unit comprises a cradle comprising the attachment means. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACOB B MEYER whose telephone number is (571)270-3535. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9-7. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, J Allen Shriver can be reached at 303.297.4337. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JACOB B. MEYER Primary Examiner Art Unit 3613 /JACOB B MEYER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 19, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589480
Storage Device System
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582568
ULTRASOUND-GUIDED INTERVENTIONAL OPERATION VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12570132
FRAME FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565409
CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE WITH A LATERAL CAB AND A BATTERY MODULE FASTENED BENEATH THE CAB
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12558950
INTEGRATED INTERNAL COMBUSTION ELECTRIC MOTOR (ICEM) CONCEPT FOR HYBRID AND PLUG-IN HYBRID VEHICLE APPLICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+16.8%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 754 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month