Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days
Stellantis Auto SAS is currently navigating 1 pending office action in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The prosecution is focused within 1 distinct art unit. This concentration suggests a specific technical focus for the company's current patent office activity. The alignment of the pending matter within a single art unit indicates that the current filing relates to a specialized aspect of semiconductor or optical technology handled by a single examiner.
MONSUR, NASIMA is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing the busiest examiner pending office action. With only a single distinct examiner active, this action represents the full extent of the company's current pending workload. Practitioners can focus their strategy on this single examiner relationship. This simplified prosecution environment allows for a dedicated approach to resolving the outstanding office action without the administrative burden of managing multiple examiners. The applicant can prioritize this interaction to ensure the technical nuances of the circuit design are clearly communicated.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MONSUR, NASIMA | 1 | 78.5% | +26.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18715006 | ESTIMATING INFORMATION IN RELATION TO A CELLULAR BATTERY | MONSUR, NASIMA | 30d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18715006 | ESTIMATING INFORMATION IN RELATION TO A CELLULAR BATTERY | MONSUR, NASIMA | 30d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2858 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18715006 | ESTIMATING INFORMATION IN RELATION TO A CELLULAR BATTERY | MONSUR, NASIMA | 2858 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 30d | Pending | May 30, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial