Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/685,384

SOUNDING REFERENCE SIGNALS FOR EIGHT TRANSMITTER UE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 21, 2024
Examiner
YEUNG, MANG HANG
Art Unit
2417
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
643 granted / 739 resolved
+29.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
762
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
§103
34.9%
-5.1% vs TC avg
§102
28.9%
-11.1% vs TC avg
§112
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 739 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION The instant application having Application No. 18/685384 filed on 02/21/2024 is presented for examination by the examiner. Claims 1, 3-6, 8-10, 12-15, 17-19, 21-24, 26-28, 30-33, 35-36 are pending. Claims 2, 7, 11, 16, 20, 25, 29 and 34 were cancelled. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection. Claim Objections Claims 21, 22 are objected to because of the following informality: Regarding claims 21 and 22, the limitation “claim 20” should be replaced with “claim 19”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3-6, 10, 12-15, 19, 21-24, 28, 30-33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Zhang et al. (US 2021/0135823 A1). As per claim 1, Zhang discloses “A method performed by a wireless device comprising :” [(par. 0100), a UE (e.g., UE 120 shown in FIG. 1) to transmit SRS using up to eight antenna ports. In the exemplary technique 1300, the UE may be configured to transmit 8 SRS ports using 2 out of 4 transmission combs 1302.] “obtaining a sounding reference signal (SRS) resource configuration for ;” [(par. 0094), the UE obtaining an indication of a technique to use in transmitting sounding reference signals (SRS) via five or more antenna ports in one slot. The UE may, for example, obtain the indication from a transmission (e.g., a DCI) from a BS, from a configuration that the UE may obtain from a network entity (e.g., a BS). (par. 0100), a UE (e.g., UE 120 shown in FIG. 1) to transmit SRS using up to eight antenna ports, the UE may be configured to transmit 8 SRS ports using 2 out of 4 transmission combs 1302 and 4 cyclic shifts.] “and transmitting SRS according to the SRS resource configuration,” [(par. 0094), the UE obtaining an indication of a technique to use in transmitting sounding reference signals (SRS) via five or more antenna ports in one slot. The UE may, for example, obtain the indication from a transmission (e.g., a DCI) from a BS, from a configuration that the UE may obtain from a network entity (e.g., a BS), or by reference to a communications standard. (par. 0100), a UE (e.g., UE 120 shown in FIG. 1) to transmit SRS using up to eight antenna ports. In the exemplary technique 1300, the UE may be configured to transmit 8 SRS ports using 2 out of 4 transmission combs 1302 and 4 cyclic shifts.] “wherein the SRS resource configuration comprises an SRS resource for ” [(par. 0094), the UE obtaining an indication of a technique to use in transmitting sounding reference signals (SRS) via five or more antenna ports in one slot. The UE may, for example, obtain the indication from a transmission (e.g., a DCI) from a BS, from a configuration that the UE may obtain from a network entity (e.g., a BS). (par. 0100), a UE (e.g., UE 120 shown in FIG. 1) to transmit SRS using up to eight antenna ports. In the exemplary technique 1300, the UE may be configured to transmit 8 SRS ports using 2 out of 4 transmission combs 1302 and 4 cyclic shifts.] “wherein the SRS resource is divided into at least two subsets” [(par. 0101), According to aspects of the present disclosure and as shown in the table at 1320, the SRSs transmitted on differing combs may use the same sets of cyclic shifts within each comb. In the exemplary technique 1300, the UE is configured to use combs 1302a and 1302c (combs #0 and #2) to transmit SRS. On comb 1302a (comb #0), up to 4 ports, 0-3, may be multiplexed using a first set of cyclic shifts, and on comb 1302c (comb #2), up to 4 ports, 4-7.] “wherein each subset is associated with a different comb offset” [(par. 0101), According to aspects of the present disclosure and as shown in the table at 1320, the SRSs transmitted on differing combs may use the same sets of cyclic shifts within each comb. In the exemplary technique 1300, the UE is configured to use combs 1302a and 1302c (combs #0 and #2) to transmit SRS. On comb 1302a (comb #0), up to 4 ports, 0-3, may be multiplexed using a first set of cyclic shifts, and on comb 1302c (comb #2), up to 4 ports, 4-7, may be multiplexed using the same first set of cyclic shifts (e.g., as shown in table 1320) or a different second set of cyclic shifts (e.g., as shown in table 1340), for a total of up to 8 ports used for transmitting SRS during one symbol period 1310.] As per claim 3, Zhang discloses “The method of claim 1,” as [see rejection of claim 1.] “wherein the ” [(par. 0101), According to aspects of the present disclosure and as shown in the table at 1320, the SRSs transmitted on differing combs may use the same sets of cyclic shifts within each comb. In the exemplary technique 1300, the UE is configured to use combs 1302a and 1302c (combs #0 and #2) to transmit SRS. On comb 1302a (comb #0), up to 4 ports, 0-3, may be multiplexed using a first set of cyclic shifts, and on comb 1302c (comb #2), up to 4 ports, 4-7, may be multiplexed using the same first set of cyclic shifts (e.g., as shown in table 1320) or a different second set of cyclic shifts (e.g., as shown in table 1340), for a total of up to 8 ports used for transmitting SRS during one symbol period 1310.] As per claim 4, Zhang discloses “The method of claim 1,” as [see rejection of claim 1.] “wherein cyclic shifts are spaced equidistantly in each of the at least two subsets” [(par. 0101), According to aspects of the present disclosure and as shown in the table at 1320, the SRSs transmitted on differing combs may use the same sets of cyclic shifts within each comb. In the exemplary technique 1300, the UE is configured to use combs 1302a and 1302c (combs #0 and #2) to transmit SRS. On comb 1302a (comb #0), up to 4 ports, 0-3, may be multiplexed using a first set of cyclic shifts, and on comb 1302c (comb #2), up to 4 ports, 4-7, may be multiplexed using the same first set of cyclic shifts (e.g., as shown in table 1320) or a different second set of cyclic shifts (e.g., as shown in table 1340), for a total of up to 8 ports used for transmitting SRS during one symbol period 1310.] As per claim 5, Zhang discloses “The method of claim 1,” as [see rejection of claim 1.] “wherein the SRS resource configuration comprises a 6 SRS port configuration using comb 2, the 6 SRS ports are divided equally among the at least two subsets, and cyclic shifts are not spaced equidistantly in each of the at least two subsets” as [see rejection of claim 1.] As per claim 6, Zhang discloses “The method of claim 1,” as [see rejection of claim 1.] “wherein the SRS resource configuration comprises a 6 SRS port configuration using comb 4 and the 6 SRS ports are not divided equally among the at least two subsets” as [see rejection of claim 1.] As per claim 19, Zhang discloses “A method performed by a network node, the method comprising:” [(par. 0100), a UE (e.g., UE 120 shown in FIG. 1) to transmit SRS using up to eight antenna ports. In the exemplary technique 1300, the UE may be configured to transmit 8 SRS ports using 2 out of 4 transmission combs 1302.] “determining a sounding reference signal (SRS) resource configuration for 6 or 8 SRS ports;” [(par. 0094), the UE obtaining an indication of a technique to use in transmitting sounding reference signals (SRS) via five or more antenna ports in one slot. The UE may, for example, obtain the indication from a transmission (e.g., a DCI) from a BS, from a configuration that the UE may obtain from a network entity (e.g., a BS). (par. 0100), a UE (e.g., UE 120 shown in FIG. 1) to transmit SRS using up to eight antenna ports, the UE may be configured to transmit 8 SRS ports using 2 out of 4 transmission combs 1302 and 4 cyclic shifts.] “and transmitting the SRS resource configuration to a wireless device,” [(par. 0094), the UE obtaining an indication of a technique to use in transmitting sounding reference signals (SRS) via five or more antenna ports in one slot. The UE may, for example, obtain the indication from a transmission (e.g., a DCI) from a BS, from a configuration that the UE may obtain from a network entity (e.g., a BS). (par. 0100), a UE (e.g., UE 120 shown in FIG. 1) to transmit SRS using up to eight antenna ports. In the exemplary technique 1300, the UE may be configured to transmit 8 SRS ports using 2 out of 4 transmission combs 1302 and 4 cyclic shifts.] “wherein the SRS resource configuration comprises an SRS resource for 6 or 8 SRS ports” [(par. 0101), According to aspects of the present disclosure and as shown in the table at 1320, the SRSs transmitted on differing combs may use the same sets of cyclic shifts within each comb. In the exemplary technique 1300, the UE is configured to use combs 1302a and 1302c (combs #0 and #2) to transmit SRS. On comb 1302a (comb #0), up to 4 ports, 0-3, may be multiplexed using a first set of cyclic shifts, and on comb 1302c (comb #2), up to 4 ports, 4-7, may be multiplexed using the same first set of cyclic shifts (e.g., as shown in table 1320) or a different second set of cyclic shifts (e.g., as shown in table 1340), for a total of up to 8 ports used for transmitting SRS during one symbol period 1310.] “wherein the SRS resource is divided into at least two subsets,” [(par. 0101), According to aspects of the present disclosure and as shown in the table at 1320, the SRSs transmitted on differing combs may use the same sets of cyclic shifts within each comb. In the exemplary technique 1300, the UE is configured to use combs 1302a and 1302c (combs #0 and #2) to transmit SRS. On comb 1302a (comb #0), up to 4 ports, 0-3, may be multiplexed using a first set of cyclic shifts, and on comb 1302c (comb #2), up to 4 ports, 4-7,] “wherein each subset is associated with a different comb offset.” [(par. 0101), According to aspects of the present disclosure and as shown in the table at 1320, the SRSs transmitted on differing combs may use the same sets of cyclic shifts within each comb. In the exemplary technique 1300, the UE is configured to use combs 1302a and 1302c (combs #0 and #2) to transmit SRS. On comb 1302a (comb #0), up to 4 ports, 0-3, may be multiplexed using a first set of cyclic shifts, and on comb 1302c (comb #2), up to 4 ports, 4-7, may be multiplexed using the same first set of cyclic shifts (e.g., as shown in table 1320) or a different second set of cyclic shifts (e.g., as shown in table 1340), for a total of up to 8 ports used for transmitting SRS during one symbol period 1310.] As per claims 10, 12-15, as [see rejections of claims 1, 3-6.] As per claims 21-24, as [see rejections of claims 3-6.] As per claims 28, 30-33, as [see rejections of claims 19, 21-24.] Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 8, 9, 17, 18, 26, 27, 35, 36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. (US 2021/0135823 A1) in view of Matsumura et al. (US 2022/0271889 A1). As per claim 8, Zhang “The method of claim 1,” as [see rejection of claim 1.] Zhang does not exilically disclose “wherein a maximum number of cyclic shifts associated with comb 2 is 16”. However, Matsumura discloses “wherein a maximum number of cyclic shifts associated with comb 2 is 16” as [(par. 0062), In the case of using Comb 2 and the CS, the UEs the maximum number of which is 2×8=16 can be multiplexed.] Zhang et al. (US 2021/0135823 A1) and Matsumura et al. (US 2022/0271889 A1) are analogous art because they are the same field of endeavor of network communication. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate Matsumura’s teaching into Zhang’s teaching. The motivation for making the above modification would be to allow adjustability on cyclic shifting based on a communication environment. As per claim 9, Zhang “The method of claim 1,” as [see rejection of claim 1.] Zhang does not exilically disclose “wherein a maximum number of cyclic shifts associated with combs 4 and 8 is 24” However, Matsumura discloses “wherein a maximum number of cyclic shifts associated with combs 4 and 8 is 24” as [(par. 0062), In the case of using Comb 2 and the CS, the UEs the maximum number of which is 2×8=16 can be multiplexed. In the case of using Comb 4 and the CS, the UEs the maximum number of which is 4×12=48 can be multiplexed. A plurality of CSs may be configured for the different UEs, or may be associated with the different SRS ports.] Zhang et al. (US 2021/0135823 A1) and Matsumura et al. (US 2022/0271889 A1) are analogous art because they are the same field of endeavor of network communication. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate Matsumura’s teaching into Zhang’s teaching. The motivation for making the above modification would be to allow adjustability on cyclic shifting based on a communication environment. As per claims 17-18, 26-27, 35-36, as [see rejections of claims 8-9.] Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US Patent Publications: Duan et al. (US Patent Publication # 2021/0112498 A1). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MANG HANG YEUNG whose telephone number is (571)270-7319. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rebecca Song can be reached on (571) 270-3667. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MANG HANG YEUNG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2417
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 21, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592806
MEASUREMENT AND REPORTING OF CROSS-LINK INTERFERENCE IMPACT ON DOWNLINK PERFORMANCE FOR FULL-DUPLEX NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12556343
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR HARQ-ACK FEEDBACK IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12542642
Information Transmission Method and Communication Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12542643
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12538273
METHODS FOR COMMUNICATION, TERMINAL DEVICE, NETWORK DEVICE, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIA
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+12.2%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 739 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month