Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/686,067

WIRELESS DEVICE, NETWORK NODE, AND METHODS PERFORMED THEREBY FOR HANDLING A CONFIGURATION OF ONE OR MORE THRESHOLDS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 23, 2024
Priority
Aug 27, 2021 — provisional 63/237,542 +1 more
Examiner
SHIVERS, ASHLEY L
Art Unit
2477
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
532 granted / 612 resolved
+28.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
629
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
82.0%
+42.0% vs TC avg
§102
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
§112
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 612 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8, 10-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Butt et al. (U.S. PGPub 2022/0346022), hereinafter referred to as Butt. Regarding claim 1, Butt discloses a method performed by a wireless device (IoT device; See Fig. 2, #201), the method being for handling a configuration of thresholds (defining first and second thresholds for a charge level of the rechargeable energy storage device; See [0052]), the wireless device having a capability of harvesting energy (energy harvesting device; See Fig. 2, #203), the wireless device operating in a wireless communications network (wireless sensor networks; See [0027]), the method comprising: - determining a configuration of one or more thresholds (defining first and second thresholds for a charge level of the rechargeable energy storage device; See [0052]), the one or more thresholds being based at least on a level of energy stored at the wireless device (a charge level of the rechargeable energy storage device; See [0052]), the determining of the configuration being based on one or more conditions of the harvesting of the energy at the wireless device (the apparatus may initially maintain, in block 301, in a memory of the apparatus, configuration information defining first and second thresholds for a charge level of the rechargeable energy storage device; See [0052]). Regarding claim 2, Butt further discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein the one or more conditions comprise: - a value of another of the one or more thresholds (defining first and second thresholds for a charge level of the rechargeable energy storage device; See [0052]). Regarding claim 3, Butt further discloses the method according to claim 1,further comprising: - determining a profile of parameters for energy harvesting (), and wherein the one or more conditions are based on the determined profile, wherein the parameters are based on at least one of: i. one or more first parameters determined autonomously by the wireless device (the apparatus may monitor, in addition to or alternative to the current energy harvesting state, the amount of energy captured by the energy harvesting device (i.e., the energy harvesting rate) and at least one of the amount of captured energy stored to the rechargeable energy storage device and the amount of captured energy used by the terminal device (e.g., for sensing or transmitting); See [0055]), ii. one or more second parameters received from a network node operating in the wireless communications network, and iii. one or more first indications received from the network node, the one or more first indications indicating a function to derive one or more third parameters. Regarding claim 4, Butt further discloses the method according to claim 3, wherein the parameters in the profile comprise at least one of: - a rate of harvesting of the energy or harvesting rate (the apparatus may monitor, in addition to or alternative to the current energy harvesting state, the amount of energy captured by the energy harvesting device (i.e., the energy harvesting rate) and at least one of the amount of captured energy stored to the rechargeable energy storage device and the amount of captured energy used by the terminal device (e.g., for sensing or transmitting); See [0055]), - harvesting source type, - energy storage capacity, and - remaining energy. Regarding claim 5, Butt further discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein the one or more conditions comprise a relationship between a current energy level parameter of the wireless device, a time parameter, and a harvesting rate parameter of the wireless device, with respect to a power parameter (The apparatus monitors, in block 302, a current charge level of the rechargeable energy storage device of the terminal device and a current energy harvesting state of the energy harvesting device of the terminal device. The energy harvesting device may be defined to have, at a time, one of two possible mutually exclusive energy harvesting states: a first energy harvesting state corresponding to an ‘ON’ state and a second energy harvesting state corresponding to an ‘OFF’ state. If the terminal device is in the first energy harvesting state, energy is harvested to the rechargeable energy storage device (i.e., the current charge level is increasing) while, if the terminal device is in the second energy harvesting state, no energy is harvested to the rechargeable energy storage device (i.e., the current charge level is decreasing or staying constant), that is, no energy is captured by the energy harvesting device or the energy captured by it is used fully for the operation of the terminal device so that nothing is left over for storing; See [0054]). Regarding claim 6, Butt further discloses the method according to claim 5, wherein at least one power parameter is determined based on at least one of: - one of the other parameters (The apparatus monitors, in block 302, a current charge level of the rechargeable energy storage device of the terminal device and a current energy harvesting state of the energy harvesting device of the terminal device. The energy harvesting device may be defined to have, at a time, one of two possible mutually exclusive energy harvesting states: a first energy harvesting state corresponding to an ‘ON’ state and a second energy harvesting state corresponding to an ‘OFF’ state. If the terminal device is in the first energy harvesting state, energy is harvested to the rechargeable energy storage device (i.e., the current charge level is increasing) while, if the terminal device is in the second energy harvesting state, no energy is harvested to the rechargeable energy storage device (i.e., the current charge level is decreasing or staying constant), that is, no energy is captured by the energy harvesting device or the energy captured by it is used fully for the operation of the terminal device so that nothing is left over for storing; See [0054]) and - each other. Regarding claim 7, Butt further discloses the method according to claim 3, further comprising: - receiving, from the network node, at least one of: the one or more first indications and the one or more second parameters (it is assumed that the application server decides that the terminal device should switch its operating mode (i.e., uplink or downlink data transmission for the terminal device should be enabled or disabled) and thus transmits, in message 605, a request (i.e., a control message) for switching the operating mode (i.e., for enabling or disabling uplink or downlink transmissions for the terminal device) to the access node. For example, if downlink transmissions by the access node are to be disabled, the access node stops downlink transmissions (and possibly buffers them instead) until new information on the current charge level and the current energy harvesting state (implying a need for switching operating modes) is received. The access node transmits, in message 606, a corresponding request (i.e., a control message) to the terminal device, wherein enabling or disabling transmissions is interpreted as the information; See [0098]). Regarding claim 8, Butt further discloses the method according to claim 3, further comprising: - sending a second indication to the network node, the second indication indicating the determined profile (The terminal device transmits, in message 602, information on current charge level and the current energy harvesting state as a control message to the access node; See [0097]). Regarding claim 10, Butt further discloses the method according to claim 1, further comprising: - sending a third indication to a network node operating in the wireless communications network, the third indication indicating the determined configuration (The terminal device transmits, in message 602, information on current charge level and the current energy harvesting state as a control message to the access node; See [0097]). Regarding claim 11, Butt further discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein the one or more thresholds comprise at least one of: - an enabling threshold of at least one of: a Quality of Service, QoS,-Flow, a Data Radio Bearer, DRB, a service, and a QoS service, - a disabling threshold of at least one of: the QoS-Flow, the DRB, the service, and the QoS service, - an enter enabling threshold of at least one of: the QoS-Flow, the DRB, the service, and the QoS service, - an enter disabling threshold of at least one of: the QoS-Flow, the DRB, the service, and the QoS service, - a transmission enabling threshold (When the current energy harvesting state corresponds to the second energy harvesting state in block 303 and further the current charge level is equal to or lower than the first threshold in block 305 but higher than the second threshold in block 306, the apparatus operates, in block 307, the terminal device in a second operating mode. The operation in the second operating mode is illustrated in FIG. 3C. The second operating mode comprises at least functions of: receiving downlink data from said at least one access node (block 321), performing sensing using said at least one sensor (block 322) and disabling uplink data transmission (block 323); See [0060]), - a transmission enabling enter threshold, - a transmission enabling leave threshold, - a transmission disabling threshold (When the current energy harvesting state corresponds to the second energy harvesting state in block 303 and further the current charge level is equal to or lower than the first threshold in block 305 but higher than the second threshold in block 306, the apparatus operates, in block 307, the terminal device in a second operating mode. The operation in the second operating mode is illustrated in FIG. 3C. The second operating mode comprises at least functions of: receiving downlink data from said at least one access node (block 321), performing sensing using said at least one sensor (block 322) and disabling uplink data transmission (block 323); See [0060]), - a transmission disabling enter threshold, - a transmission disabling leave threshold, - an energy warning enter threshold, and - an energy warning leave threshold. Regarding claim 12, Butt further discloses the method according to claim 11, wherein the at least one of the one or more thresholds is for one of: a) data transmission between the wireless communications network and the wireless device, and b) wireless communication between the wireless communications network and the wireless device (When the current energy harvesting state corresponds to the second energy harvesting state in block 303 and further the current charge level is equal to or lower than the first threshold in block 305 but higher than the second threshold in block 306, the apparatus operates, in block 307, the terminal device in a second operating mode. The operation in the second operating mode is illustrated in FIG. 3C. The second operating mode comprises at least functions of: receiving downlink data from said at least one access node (block 321), performing sensing using said at least one sensor (block 322) and disabling uplink data transmission (block 323); See [0060]). Regarding claim 13, Butt further discloses the method according to claim 1, further comprising: - initiating applying the determined configuration (the apparatus may initially maintain, in block 301, in a memory of the apparatus, configuration information defining first and second thresholds for a charge level of the rechargeable energy storage device; See [0052]). Regarding claim 14, Butt further discloses the method according to claim 8, wherein the wireless device is configured by the network node with at least one of: periodic, semi-static or aperiodic reporting, and wherein the sending of at least one of the second indication and the third indication is performed based on the configured reporting (the terminal device may be configured to perform such transmissions periodically or regularly, regardless of the current operating mode; See [0097]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Butt as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Li et al. (U.S. PGPub 2014/0011543), hereinafter referred to as Li. Regarding claim 9, Butt fails to teach the method according to claim 1, wherein a first condition of the one or more conditions is a time window having expired. wherein a first condition of the one or more conditions is a time window having expired (After a BS is turned ON, it turns OFF after its timer expires or turns OFF if the BS exhausts out of energy, whichever condition occurs first. After the BS turns itself OFF, the load is handled by the new BSs that wake up from the cluster; See [0128]). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time before the effective filing date of the invention, to modify the method of Butt to include wherein a first condition of the one or more conditions is a time window having expired taught by Li in order to optimize energy consumption and battery usage. Claims 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Butt as in view of Li. Regarding claim 15, Butt discloses a method performed by a network node (access node; See Fig. 2, #211), the method being for handling a configuration of thresholds (defining first and second thresholds for a charge level of the rechargeable energy storage device; See [0052]), the network node operating in a wireless communications network (wireless sensor networks; See [0027]), the method comprising: - receiving a third indication from a wireless device operating in the wireless communications network (The terminal device transmits, in message 602, information on current charge level and the current energy harvesting state as a control message to the access node; See [0097]), the wireless device having a capability of harvesting energy (energy harvesting device; See Fig. 2, #203), the third indication indicating a configuration determined by the wireless device (The terminal device transmits, in message 602, information on current charge level and the current energy harvesting state as a control message to the access node; See [0097]), the configuration having been determined by the wireless device based on one or more conditions of the harvesting of the energy at the wireless device (a charge level of the rechargeable energy storage device; See [0052]). Butt fails to explicitly teach the configuration being of one or more thresholds, the one or more thresholds being based at least on a level of energy stores at the wireless device. Li teaches the configuration being of one or more thresholds, the one or more thresholds being based at least on a level of energy stores at the wireless device (MS 300 sends 2910 battery level information and RF chain capability information to the BS 401. The MS 300 is served by BS 401 (also referred to as serving base station). The battery level information can include measurements about the energy level of the battery of MS 300, comparisons of the mobile station battery level to one or more threshold values, and an estimated time of remaining battery power; See [0239]). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time before the effective filing date of the invention, to modify the method of Butt to include the configuration being of one or more thresholds, the one or more thresholds being based at least on a level of energy stores at the wireless device taught by Li in order to optimize energy consumption and battery usage. Regarding claim 16, Butt fails to teach the method according to claim 15, further comprising: - determining the configuration of the one or more thresholds used by the wireless device, based on received third configuration. Li teaches determining the configuration of the one or more thresholds used by the wireless device, based on received third configuration (The serving BS 401 receives the mobile station battery level information and RF chain capability information. BS 401a decides 2920 the transmission scheme for BS 401a and decides a receiving scheme for MS 300 based on the battery level of the mobile station and the battery level of the base station (for example, energy level stored in the energy storage module 630), wherein the threshold information is received in the message 2910 received prior; See [0239]-[0240]). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time before the effective filing date of the invention, to modify the method of Butt to include determining the configuration of the one or more thresholds used by the wireless device, based on received third configuration taught by Li in order to optimize energy consumption and battery usage. Regarding claim 17, Butt fails to teach the method according to claim 16, further comprising: - initiating applying the determined configuration. Li teaches initiating applying the determined configuration (The serving BS 401 receives the mobile station battery level information and RF chain capability information. BS 401a decides 2920 the transmission scheme for BS 401a and decides a receiving scheme for MS 300 based on the battery level of the mobile station and the battery level of the base station (for example, energy level stored in the energy storage module 630), wherein the threshold information is received in the message 2910 received prior; See [0239]-[0240]). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time before the effective filing date of the invention, to modify the method of Butt to include initiating applying the determined configuration taught by Li in order to optimize energy consumption and battery usage. Regarding claim 18, Butt further teaches the method according to claim 15, wherein the one or more conditions comprise: - a value of another of the one or more thresholds (defining first and second thresholds for a charge level of the rechargeable energy storage device; See [0052]). Regarding claim 19, Butt fails to teach the method according to claim 15, further comprising: - determining at least one of: a) one or more first indications and b) one or more second parameters for energy harvesting of the wireless device, the one or more first indications indicating a function to derive one or more third parameters. Li teaches determining at least one of: a) one or more first indications (Serving BS 401a informs 2950 MS 300 about the decided transmission scheme (namely, the configuration that serving BS 401a is using to transmit), if different from the current configuration. Serving 401a notifies MS 300 about how the mobile station should receive signals from the serving BS 401. That is, serving BS 401 suggests a reception scheme to MS 300; See [0242]) and b) one or more second parameters for energy harvesting of the wireless device, the one or more first indications indicating a function to derive one or more third parameters (Serving BS 401a informs 2950 MS 300 about the decided transmission scheme (namely, the configuration that serving BS 401a is using to transmit), if different from the current configuration. Serving 401a notifies MS 300 about how the mobile station should receive signals from the serving BS 401. That is, serving BS 401 suggests a reception scheme to MS 300; See [0242]). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time before the effective filing date of the invention, to modify the method of Butt to include determining at least one of: a) one or more first indications and b) one or more second parameters for energy harvesting of the wireless device, the one or more first indications indicating a function to derive one or more third parameters taught by Li in order to optimize energy consumption and battery usage. Regarding claim 20, Butt further teaches the method according to claim 19, at least one of the second parameters and the one or more third parameters comprise at least one of: - a rate of harvesting of the energy or harvesting rate (the apparatus may monitor, in addition to or alternative to the current energy harvesting state, the amount of energy captured by the energy harvesting device (i.e., the energy harvesting rate) and at least one of the amount of captured energy stored to the rechargeable energy storage device and the amount of captured energy used by the terminal device (e.g., for sensing or transmitting); See [0055]), - harvesting source type, - energy storage capacity, and - remaining energy. Conclusion Any response to this action should be mailed to: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 Hand delivered responses should be brought to: Customer Service Window Randolph Building 401 Dulany Street Alexandria, VA 22314 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ASHLEY L SHIVERS whose telephone number is (571)270-3523. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chirag Shah can be reached at 571-272-3144. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ASHLEY SHIVERS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2477 4/4/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 23, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12615571
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ROUTING DATA IN A COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
3y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12609735
NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN RECONFIGURABLE INTELLIGENT SURFACES
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12593248
INFORMATION TRANSMISSION METHOD AND DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12580687
METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM FOR TRANSMITTING OR RECEIVING DATA CHANNEL AND CONTROL CHANNEL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
3y 8m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12562852
METHOD AND DEVICE IN NODES USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
3y 11m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.9%)
2y 9m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 612 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month