Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/686,727

Determining Whether Uplink Transmission is Configured for PUSCH Repetition or TBoMS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Feb 26, 2024
Examiner
JAHANGIR, KABIR U
Art Unit
2464
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
394 granted / 450 resolved
+29.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
471
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
46.8%
+6.8% vs TC avg
§102
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
§112
9.2%
-30.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 450 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claims 38-57 are pending. Claims 1-37 are canceled. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 02/26/2024 was filed. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant's cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 38-44 and 46-57 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Xiong et al. (US 20240179692, Xiong hereinafter). As to claim 38: Xiong discloses a method, implemented in a wireless device, the method comprising: determining whether an uplink transmission is for Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) repetition or Transport Block processing over Multi-Slot PUSCH (TBoMS) based on a field in a Time Domain Resource Allocation (TDRA) list (see at least paragraphs [0048]-[0054], one bit indication can be included as part of TDRA information in each row. In one example, bit “1” may be used to indicate that single-slot PUSCH transmission is scheduled and bit “0” may be used to indicate that TBoMS transmission is scheduled. when a UE is scheduled with a TDRA entry within entry 0 to P0-1, UE can determine that single-slot PUSCH transmission is scheduled. Similarly, when a UE is scheduled with a TDRA entry within entry P1 to P1-1, UE can determine that TBoMS transmission is scheduled.); and transmitting the uplink transmission in accordance with the determination (see at least paragraph [0144], transmitting, by a user equipment (UE), the TBoMS on PUSCH in accordance with the indication.). As to claim 39: Xiong discloses the method of claim 38. Xiong further discloses wherein the TDRA list is defined for PUSCH repetition and TBoMS (see at least paragraphs [0046]-[0054], one bit indication can be included as part of TDRA information in each row. In one example, bit “1” may be used to indicate that single-slot PUSCH transmission is scheduled and bit “0” may be used to indicate that TBoMS transmission is scheduled.). As to claim 40: Xiong discloses the method of claim 38. Xiong further discloses wherein the TDRA list comprises separate fields for the number of slots and the number of repetitions, regardless of whether the uplink transmission is for PUSCH repetition or TBoMS (see at least paragraph [0046], TDRA list for TBoMS, number of slots for a single TBoMS transmission (N), number of repetitions (M).). As to claim 41: Xiong discloses the method of claim 40. Xiong further discloses wherein determining whether the uplink transmission is for PUSCH repetition or TBoMS comprises determining that the uplink transmission is for PUSCH repetition responsive to the field for the number of slots in the TDRA list having a value that indicates one slot (see at least paragraph [0046], TDRA list for TBoMS, number of slots for a single TBoMS transmission (N).). As to claim 42: Xiong discloses the method of claim 40. Xiong further discloses wherein determining whether the uplink transmission is for PUSCH repetition or TBoMS comprises determining that the uplink transmission is for TBoMS responsive to the field for the number of slots in the TDRA list having a value that indicates more than one slot (see at least paragraphs [0046] and [0160], TDRA list for TBoMS, number of slots for a single TBoMS transmission (N) where the value of N is specified (e.g., one of 2, 3, 4) or configured via higher layers, UE omits the actual TBoMS transmission in the number of symbols.). As to claim 43: Xiong discloses the method of claim 42. Xiong further discloses wherein when it is determined that the uplink transmission is for TBoMS, determining the number of repetitions to be used for the TBoMS according to the value of the field for the number of repetitions (see at least paragraph [0046], TDRA list for TBoMS, number of repetitions (M).). As to claim 44: Xiong discloses the method of claim 38. Xiong further discloses wherein the wireless device support for enhanced Type A PUSCH repetition and TBoMS are independent from each other (see at least paragraph [0029]-[0031], Type A PUSCH repetition and TBoMS.). As to claim 46: Xiong discloses the method of claim 38. Xiong further discloses wherein the PUSCH repetition comprises one or more repetitions of a single-slot transport block (see at least paragraph [0046], single-slot PUSCH transmission with or without repetitions). As to claim 47: Xiong discloses the method of claim 38. Xiong further discloses wherein the TBoMS extends the time domain resource for the transmission of a transport block across a slot border (see at least paragraph [0021], support the transmission of a TB processing over multiple slots (TBoMS).). As to claim 48: Xiong discloses a wireless device comprising: processing circuitry (see at least paragraphs [0136]-[0137], processor) and memory circuitry (see at least paragraphs [0136]-[0137], memory), the memory circuitry containing instructions executable by the processing circuitry whereby the wireless device is configured to: determine whether an uplink transmission is for Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) repetition or Transport Block processing over Multi-Slot PUSCH (TBoMS) based on a field in a Time Domain Resource Allocation (TDRA) list (see at least paragraphs [0048]-[0054], one bit indication can be included as part of TDRA information in each row. In one example, bit “1” may be used to indicate that single-slot PUSCH transmission is scheduled and bit “0” may be used to indicate that TBoMS transmission is scheduled. when a UE is scheduled with a TDRA entry within entry 0 to P0-1, UE can determine that single-slot PUSCH transmission is scheduled. Similarly, when a UE is scheduled with a TDRA entry within entry P1 to P1-1, UE can determine that TBoMS transmission is scheduled.); and transmit the uplink transmission in accordance with the determination (see at least paragraph [0144], transmitting, by a user equipment (UE), the TBoMS on PUSCH in accordance with the indication.). As to claim 49: Xiong discloses a method, implemented by a network node, the method comprising: indicating, to a wireless device, whether an uplink transmission is for Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) repetition or Transport Block processing over Multi-Slot PUSCH (TBoMS) based on a field in a Time Domain Resource Allocation (TDRA) list (see at least paragraphs [0048]-[0054], one bit indication can be included as part of TDRA information in each row. In one example, bit “1” may be used to indicate that single-slot PUSCH transmission is scheduled and bit “0” may be used to indicate that TBoMS transmission is scheduled. when a UE is scheduled with a TDRA entry within entry 0 to P0-1, UE can determine that single-slot PUSCH transmission is scheduled. Similarly, when a UE is scheduled with a TDRA entry within entry P1 to P1-1, UE can determine that TBoMS transmission is scheduled.); and receiving the uplink transmission from the wireless device in accordance with the indication (see at least paragraph [0144], transmitting, by a user equipment (UE), the TBoMS on PUSCH in accordance with the indication.). As to claim 50: Xiong discloses the method of claim 49. Xiong further discloses wherein the TDRA list is defined for PUSCH repetition and TBoMS (see at least paragraphs [0046]-[0054], one bit indication can be included as part of TDRA information in each row. In one example, bit “1” may be used to indicate that single-slot PUSCH transmission is scheduled and bit “0” may be used to indicate that TBoMS transmission is scheduled.). As to claim 51: Xiong discloses the method of claim 49. Xiong further discloses wherein the TDRA list comprises separate fields for the number of slots and the number of repetitions, regardless of whether the uplink transmission is for PUSCH repetition or TBoMS (see at least paragraph [0046], TDRA list for TBoMS, number of slots for a single TBoMS transmission (N), number of repetitions (M).). As to claim 52: Xiong discloses the method of claim 49. Xiong further discloses wherein: the indicating comprises including, in a number of slots field in the TDRA list, a value that indicates one slot or a value that indicates more than one slot, and transmitting the TDRA list to the wireless device; the value that indicates one slot indicates that the uplink transmission is for PUSCH repetition; and the value that indicates more than one slot indicates that the uplink transmission is for TBoMS (see at least paragraphs [0048]-[0054], one bit indication can be included as part of TDRA information in each row. In one example, bit “1” may be used to indicate that single-slot PUSCH transmission is scheduled and bit “0” may be used to indicate that TBoMS transmission is scheduled. when a UE is scheduled with a TDRA entry within entry 0 to P0-1, UE can determine that single-slot PUSCH transmission is scheduled. Similarly, when a UE is scheduled with a TDRA entry within entry P1 to P1-1, UE can determine that TBoMS transmission is scheduled.). As to claim 53: Xiong discloses the method of claim 52. Xiong further discloses wherein when it is indicated that the uplink transmission is for PUSCH repetition, the method further comprises indicating a number of repetitions to be used for the PUSCH repetition according to the value of the field for the number of repetitions (see at least paragraph [0046], TDRA list for TBoMS, number of repetitions (M).). As to claim 54: Xiong discloses the method of claim 52. Xiong further discloses wherein when it is indicated that the uplink transmission is for TBoMS, the method further comprises indicating a number of repetitions to be used for the TBoMS according to the value of the field for the number of repetitions (see at least paragraph [0046], TDRA list for TBoMS, number of repetitions (M).). As to claim 55: Xiong discloses the method of claim 49, wherein the PUSCH repetition comprises one or more repetitions of a single-slot transport block (see at least paragraph [0046], single-slot PUSCH transmission with or without repetitions). As to claim 56: Xiong discloses the method of claim 49. Xiong further discloses wherein the TBoMS extends the time domain resource for the transmission of a transport block across a slot border (see at least paragraph [0021], support the transmission of a TB processing over multiple slots (TBoMS).). As to claim 57: Xiong discloses a network node comprising: processing circuitry (see at least paragraphs [0136]-[0137], processor) and memory circuitry (see at least paragraphs [0136]-[0137], memory), the memory circuitry containing instructions executable by the processing circuitry whereby the network node is configured to: indicate, to a wireless device, whether an uplink transmission is for Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) repetition or Transport Block processing Client Docket No. P103343US02 over Multi-Slot PUSCH (TBoMS) based on a field in a Time Domain Resource Allocation (TDRA) list (see at least paragraphs [0048]-[0054], one bit indication can be included as part of TDRA information in each row. In one example, bit “1” may be used to indicate that single-slot PUSCH transmission is scheduled and bit “0” may be used to indicate that TBoMS transmission is scheduled. when a UE is scheduled with a TDRA entry within entry 0 to P0-1, UE can determine that single-slot PUSCH transmission is scheduled. Similarly, when a UE is scheduled with a TDRA entry within entry P1 to P1-1, UE can determine that TBoMS transmission is scheduled.); and receive the uplink transmission from the wireless device in accordance with the indication (see at least paragraph [0144], transmitting, by a user equipment (UE), the TBoMS on PUSCH in accordance with the indication.). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 45 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Xiong et al. (US 20240179692, Xiong hereinafter) in view of Yi et al. (US 20240323964, Yi hereinafter). As to claim 45: Xiong discloses the method of claim 38. Xiong does not explicitly disclose wherein TBoMS transmissions are not supported in unlicensed spectrum. However Yi wherein TBoMS transmissions are not supported in unlicensed spectrum (see at least paragraph [0106], TB processing over multi-slot (TBoMS) PUSCH transmission in a 5G system interpreted as supported in licensed spectrum on in unlicensed.). Thus it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to implement TBoMS transmission over licensed spectrum, as taught by Yi, into the invention of Xiong in order to improv coverage of an uplink channel in a wireless communication system (see Yi, paragraphs [0006]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Deng et al. (US 20240155575) discloses Methods And Systems For Coverage Enhancement In Wireless Networks. Yao et al. (US 20230319813) discloses Mechanism For Tb Processing Over Multi-Slot Scheme. Zhang et al. (US 20220304035) discloses Physical Uplink Shared Channel Repetition With Different Configurations. Echigo et al. (US 20240179688) discloses Terminal And Radio Communication Method. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KABIR U JAHANGIR whose telephone number is (571)272-0796. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 10am to 6:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Ngo can be reached at (571)272-3139. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /K. J./ Examiner, Art Unit 2464 /RICKY Q NGO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2464
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 26, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598554
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ADJUSTING MAXIMUM UPLINK TRANSMISSION POWER IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12581371
METHOD AND DEVICE IN COMMUNICATION NODE USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12563468
INTER-PAN OPTIMIZATION BY CONTROLLER DEVICE REDIRECTING TARGET NETWORK DEVICES TO ATTACH TO SELECTED PARENT DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556985
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION APPARATUS ON VEHICLE AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12557130
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ALLOCATING UPLINK CONTROL CHANNELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+8.9%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 450 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month