Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/687,894

POLYMERIC PARTICULATE MATERIAL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 29, 2024
Examiner
PATEL, RONAK C
Art Unit
1788
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
The University of Nottingham
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allow Rate
326 granted / 645 resolved
-14.5% vs TC avg
Strong +57% interview lift
Without
With
+56.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
56 currently pending
Career history
701
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
70.1%
+30.1% vs TC avg
§102
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
§112
18.0%
-22.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 645 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-16 and 18-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Diekmann et al. (US 2013/0183529) in view of Park et al. (Suspension Polymerization and Characterization of Transparent Poly(methyl methacrylate-co-isobornyl methacrylate) and Borst et al. (US 2019/0161618). Regarding claims 1-10, 12-16, 20-23 Diekmann discloses powder, comprising composite particles comprising core particles completely or partially coated with a precipitated first polymer, where the core particles comprise a second polymer which differs from the precipitated first polymer (abstract). Laser sintering processes are known and are based on the selective sintering of polymer particles, where layers of polymer particles are briefly exposed to laser light and the polymer particles exposed to the laser light bond to one another. The successive sintering of layers of polymer particles produces three-dimensional object (para 0079). The second polymer is selected from the group consisting of a polycarbonate, a polymethyl methacrylate, a polypropylene, a polybutylene terephthalate, a polyethylene terephthalate, a polyether ether ketone and a polyphthalamide (claim 3). The precipitated first polymer is selected from the group consisting of a polyolefin, a polyethylene, a polypropylene, a polyvinyl chloride, a polyacetal, a polystyrene, a polyimide, a polysulphone, a poly(N-methylmethacrylimide), a polymethyl methacrylate, a polyvinylidene fluorides, an ionomer, a polyether ketone, a polyaryl ether ketone, a polyamide, a copolyamide, and a mixture thereof (claim 4). The weight ratio of the first polymer to the core particles, based on the entirety of the composite particles, is from 0.1 to 30 (claim 9) which makes the polymeric core 75 wt% or more of each particle. However, Diekmann fails to disclose that the polymeric shell is formed from a copolymer of a major monomer and a minor monomer, where major monomer comprises a polymerizable group and a minor monomer comprises a polymerizable group and a functional component. Whereas, Park discloses methacrylate copolymer based on isobornyl methacrylate (IBMA) and methyl methacrylate (MMA) was synthesized in an aqueous suspension via free-radical polymerization. The composition of the copolymer was analyzed using 1 H-NMR, and the heat resistance by measuring the glass transition temperature, which exhibited a linear dependency on the IBMA content in the copolymer (abstract). The PMMA is present in an amount of greater than 90 wt% and IBMA in an amount of less than 10wt% (see table 1). Whereas, Borst discloses red methine dyes, methods for the preparation thereof, and use thereof for dyeing plastics, especially vinyl polymers, provide red colourings with improved colour strengths and improved colour brilliance (abstract). The plastic is polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and the method comprises mixing or dissolving the dye with one or more methyl methacrylate monomers, and polymerizing the monomers in the presence of one or more polymerization catalysts.Dyes of the formula (I) can exist as stereoisomers. Formula (I) particularly includes the following four E and Z isomers of the formulae (Ia) to (Id) (para 0073). Using the dyes of the formula (I) according to the invention, red colouration of plastics can be achieved, which are surprisingly characterized by both greater colour strength and at the same time greater colour brilliance compared with the colourations achievable with the known dyes (para 0075). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the application was filed to include methacrylate copolymer based on isobornyl methacrylate (IBMA) and methyl methacrylate (MMA) having MMA in major monomer and IBMA in minor monomer and treat it with dye as taught by Park in view of Borst in the shell of Diekmann motivated by the desire to have improved heat resistance properties and improved color strength and brilliance. Regarding claim 11, As Diekmann in view of Park discloses major monomer such as methyl methacrylate as presently claimed, it therefore would be obvious that when polymerized (i.e. PMMA) would intrinsically have Tg that differs from the Tm of the thermoplastic polymer that forms the polymer core by no more than 10C. Regarding claims 18-19, Diekmann discloses powder, comprising composite particles comprising core particles completely or partially coated with a precipitated first polymer, where the core particles comprise a second polymer which differs from the precipitated first polymer (abstract) and Laser sintering processes are known and are based on the selective sintering of polymer particles, where layers of polymer particles are briefly exposed to laser light and the polymer particles exposed to the laser light bond to one another. The successive sintering of layers of polymer particles produces three-dimensional object (para 0079). Whereas, Borst discloses red methine dyes, methods for the preparation thereof, and use thereof for dyeing plastics, especially vinyl polymers, provide red colourings with improved colour strengths and improved colour brilliance (abstract). The plastic is polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and the method comprises mixing or dissolving the dye with one or more methyl methacrylate monomers, and polymerizing the monomers in the presence of one or more polymerization catalysts.Dyes of the formula (I) can exist as stereoisomers. Formula (I) particularly includes the following four E and Z isomers of the formulae (Ia) to (Id) (para 0073). Using the dyes of the formula (I) according to the invention, red colouration of plastics can be achieved, which are surprisingly characterized by both greater colour strength and at the same time greater colour brilliance compared with the colourations achievable with the known dyes (para 0075). Thus, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to include dye that is different in color in two or more different particulate materials based on the teaching of Diekmann and Borst through process optimization for end use applications. Claim(s) 1 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Diekmann et al. (US 2013/0183529) in view of Chen et al. (US 2020/0172755), Loccufier et al. (US 2012/0046376) and Borst et al. (US 2019/0161618). Regarding claims 1 and 17 Diekmann discloses powder, comprising composite particles comprising core particles completely or partially coated with a precipitated first polymer, where the core particles comprise a second polymer which differs from the precipitated first polymer (abstract). Laser sintering processes are known and are based on the selective sintering of polymer particles, where layers of polymer particles are briefly exposed to laser light and the polymer particles exposed to the laser light bond to one another. The successive sintering of layers of polymer particles produces three-dimensional object (para 0079). The second polymer is selected from the group consisting of a polycarbonate, a polymethyl methacrylate, a polypropylene, a polybutylene terephthalate, a polyethylene terephthalate, a polyether ether ketone and a polyphthalamide (claim 3). The precipitated first polymer is selected from the group consisting of a polyolefin, a polyethylene, a polypropylene, a polyvinyl chloride, a polyacetal, a polystyrene, a polyimide, a polysulphone, a poly(N-methylmethacrylimide), a polymethyl methacrylate, a polyvinylidene fluorides, an ionomer, a polyether ketone, a polyaryl ether ketone, a polyamide, a copolyamide, and a mixture thereof (claim 4). The weight ratio of the first polymer to the core particles, based on the entirety of the composite particles, is from 0.1 to 30 (claim 9) which makes the polymeric core 75 wt% or more of each particle. However, Diekmann fails to disclose that the polymeric shell is formed from a copolymer of a major monomer and a minor monomer, where major monomer comprises a polymerizable group and a minor monomer comprises a polymerizable group and a functional component. Whereas, Chen discloses polymeric particles having core-shell structure wherein at least one of the polymeric core and the polymeric shell is formed from a monomers mixture comprising isobornyl (meth)acrylate and wherein the isobornyl (meth)acrylate is present in the monomers mixture in an amount of 1 wt % to 40 wt %, relative to the weight of the corresponding monomers mixture for the polymeric core or polymeric shell (para 0006), where isobornyl methacrylate is a major monomer in the shell. Whereas, Loccufier discloses radiation curable ink and a radiation curable ink jet ink including such a polymerizable photoinitiator (para 0022).The polymeric core includes polyamide (which encompasses PA-12) (see claim 15). Whereas, Borst discloses red methine dyes, methods for the preparation thereof, and use thereof for dyeing plastics, especially vinyl polymers, provide red colourings with improved colour strengths and improved colour brilliance (abstract). The plastic is polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and the method comprises mixing or dissolving the dye with one or more methyl methacrylate monomers, and polymerizing the monomers in the presence of one or more polymerization catalysts.Dyes of the formula (I) can exist as stereoisomers. Formula (I) particularly includes the following four E and Z isomers of the formulae (Ia) to (Id) (para 0073). Using the dyes of the formula (I) according to the invention, red colouration of plastics can be achieved, which are surprisingly characterized by both greater colour strength and at the same time greater colour brilliance compared with the colourations achievable with the known dyes (para 0075). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the application was filed to include isobornyl methacrylate (IBMA) in major monomer and treat it with dye as taught by Chen in view of Borst in the shell of Diekmann motivated by the desire to have to have improved mechanical properties and improved color strength and brilliance and to include polyamide as taught by Loccufier in the core of Diekmann motivated by the desire to have excellent abrasion and wear resistance and good chemical resistance. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RONAK C PATEL whose telephone number is (571)270-1142. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30AM-6:30PM (FLEX). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ALICIA CHEVALIER can be reached at 5712721490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RONAK C PATEL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1788
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 29, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600824
PELLETS OF A GLASS FIBER-REINFORCED THERMOPLASTIC POLYMER COMPOSITION, AND METHOD OF THEIR MANUFACTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12591080
POLARIZING PLATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12570807
Polyethylene Powder and Molded Article
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571214
CERAMIC GRANULES WITH A PHOTOCATALYTIC COATING AND METHOD OF MAKING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573629
CATHODE MATERIAL FOR SULFIDE-BASED ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERIES, MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF, AND ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+56.7%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 645 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month