Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

The University of Nottingham

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 6 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

The University of Nottingham is active in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The portfolio currently has 6 pending office actions. These matters are spread across 5 distinct art units, reflecting a broad range of technical examination environments. The 5 distinct art units suggest that the 6 pending office actions cover a diverse array of scientific classifications.

The prosecution involves 6 distinct examiners. CHANG, MINKI is the busiest examiner for the university, currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because there are 6 distinct examiners for 6 pending office actions, no single examiner is handling more than one active matter for the portfolio. This distribution across 5 distinct art units and 6 distinct examiners indicates a highly decentralized prosecution strategy where each matter receives individual attention from a different examiner.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (71%)
2
Medium (29%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (14%)
§103 only2 (29%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (57%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
57% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
29% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHANG, MINKI 1 71.6% +10.1%
BOECKELMAN, JACOB A 1 35.2% +45.6%
FANG, MICHAEL YIMING 1 61.9% +39.6%
BOWERS, NATHAN ANDREW 1 59.4% +31.9%
BLANCO, JAVIER G 1 76.0% +45.2%
RUFO, LOUIS J 1 54.4% +22.9%
VAN BUREN, LAUREN K 1 39.8% +58.1%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17799910 MICROTOPOGRAPHIES AND USES THEREOF BOWERS, NATHAN ANDREW 22d
18247313 MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY METHOD AND SYSTEM FANG, MICHAEL YIMING 41d
19047778 ELECTRIC MOTOR AND COMPONENTS CHANG, MINKI —
18557561 DECELLULARIZED TISSUE HYDROGELS BOECKELMAN, JACOB A —
17776990 CORNEAL TISSUE BLANCO, JAVIER G —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17799910 MICROTOPOGRAPHIES AND USES THEREOF BOWERS, NATHAN ANDREW 22d
17440991 Enhanced Transfection VAN BUREN, LAUREN K 33d
18247313 MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY METHOD AND SYSTEM FANG, MICHAEL YIMING 41d
19047778 ELECTRIC MOTOR AND COMPONENTS CHANG, MINKI —
18557561 DECELLULARIZED TISSUE HYDROGELS BOECKELMAN, JACOB A —
17776990 CORNEAL TISSUE BLANCO, JAVIER G —
17635480 REACTION APPARATUS RUFO, LOUIS J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1655 1
3798 1
1799 1
3774 1
1795 1
1638 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19047778 ELECTRIC MOTOR AND COMPONENTS CHANG, MINKI — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 07, 2025
18557561 DECELLULARIZED TISSUE HYDROGELS BOECKELMAN, JACOB A 1655 §101§102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 26, 2023
18247313 MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY METHOD AND SYSTEM FANG, MICHAEL YIMING 3798 §103§112 Final Rejection 41d Pending Mar 30, 2023
17799910 MICROTOPOGRAPHIES AND USES THEREOF BOWERS, NATHAN ANDREW 1799 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Aug 15, 2022
17776990 CORNEAL TISSUE BLANCO, JAVIER G 3774 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 13, 2022
17635480 REACTION APPARATUS RUFO, LOUIS J 1795 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 15, 2022
17440991 Enhanced Transfection VAN BUREN, LAUREN K 1638 §103 Final Rejection 33d Pending Sep 20, 2021

Managing The University of Nottingham's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month