Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/689,146

An Efficient Lower-Layer Split Opton Enabling Centralized Beamforming for Cascaded Distributed-Multiple-Input Multiple-Output

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 05, 2024
Examiner
LO, DIANE LEE
Art Unit
2466
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
842 granted / 941 resolved
+31.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
966
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
50.4%
+10.4% vs TC avg
§102
32.8%
-7.2% vs TC avg
§112
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 941 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION This is response to Application 18/689,146 filed on 03/05/2024 in which claims 36-54 are presented for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 36-49 and 51-54 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated Yuan (US 2021/0119674 A1). 1. Regarding claim 36, Yuan teaches a method performed by a network entity in a communications network (Fig. 3 Paragraphs [0059] to [0072]), the communication network including a plurality of network nodes communicatively coupled to the network entity via a cascaded topology, the method comprising: transmitting scheduling information to a first network node of the plurality of network nodes, the scheduling information indicating user layers to be used for communication with a communication device (Figure 3 305; Paragraph [0065] and [0066] MU-MIMO scheduling); receiving an indication of an intermediate beamforming weight from the first network node (Fig. 3, Paragraph [0062] to [0064] compressed matrix); determining a part of a frequency-domain beamforming weight based on the indication of the intermediate beamforming weight (Fig 3 Paragraphs [0060] and [0067] partial precoding information); and communicating with the communication device via the first network node using the part of the frequency-domain beamforming weight (Fig. 3 Paragraphs [0069] to [0072] improved precoder information notification). 2. Regarding claim 37, Yuan teaches wherein receiving the indication of the intermediate beamforming weight comprises receiving an indication of a combined intermediate beamforming weight from the first network node, the combined intermediate beamforming weight being a combination of intermediate beamforming weights that are each associated with one of the plurality of network nodes (Fig. 3 Paragraphs [0059] to [0072] Full precoding generation). 3. Regarding claim 38, Yuan teaches wherein the combined intermediate beamforming weight is a Hermitian matrix of size K X K, where K is a total number of user layers served by the network entity (Yuan, Paragraph [0043] Hermitian matrix). 4. Regarding claim 39, Yuan teaches wherein the indication of the combined intermediate beamforming weight is an indication of upper triangle components or lower triangle components of the Hermitian matrix (Yuan, Paragraphs [0062] and [0063] triangle components). 5. Regarding claim 40, Yuan teaches wherein determining the part of the frequency-domain beamforming weight comprises: determining a regularization factor based on the intermediate beamforming weight; determining an identity matrix of size K X K, where K is a total number of user layers served by the network entity (Yuan, Paragraph [0067] factor of 1 as regularization factor); and determining the part of the frequency-domain beamforming weight based on the inverse of an addition of the intermediate beamforming weight and a multiplication of the identity matrix and regularization factor (Yuan, Figure 3 Paragraph [0062] correlation-relationship matrix generation). 6. Regarding claim 41, Yuan teaches, wherein communicating with the communication device comprises: determining an intermediate downlink (DL) signal based on DL data associated with the communication device and the part of the frequency-domain beamforming weight, wherein determining the intermediate DL signal comprises determining a beamformed user-layer DL data stream based on a modulated symbol of a user layer associated with the communication device and based on the part of the frequency-domain beamforming weight (Figure 3 Paragraph [0068] and [0069] UE scheduling); and transmitting the intermediate DL signal to the first network node (Figure 3 Paragraph [0068] and [0069] UE scheduling). 7. Regarding claim 42, Yuan teaches wherein communicating with the communication device comprises: receiving an intermediate uplink (UL) signal associated with the communication device from the first network node (Paragraph [0068] and [0069] full precoding generation); and determining a beamformed received signal associated with the communication device based on the intermediate UL signal and the part of the frequency-domain beamforming weight (Paragraph [0068] and [0069] full precoding generation). 8. Regarding claim 43, Yuan teaches wherein receiving the intermediate UL signal comprises: receiving a combined intermediate UL signal from the first network node, the combined intermediate UL signal being a combination of intermediate UL signals that are each associated with one of the plurality of network nodes; and determining the intermediate UL signal based on the combined intermediate UL signal (Figure 3, Paragraph [0068] and [0069] full precoding generation). 9. Regarding claim 44, Yuan teaches a method performed by a first network node of a plurality of network nodes in a communications network (Fig. 3 Paragraphs [0059] to [0072]), the plurality of network nodes being communicatively coupled to a first network entity via a cascaded topology, the method comprising: receiving scheduling information from a second network entity in the communication network indicating user layers to be used for communication with a communication device (Figure 3 305; Paragraph [0065] and [0066] MU-MIMO scheduling);; determining an intermediate beamforming weight based on a channel estimate associated with a channel between the first network node and the communication device (Fig. 3, Paragraph [0062] to [0064] compressed matrix);; transmitting an indication of the intermediate beamforming weight to the second network entity; determining a part of a frequency-domain beamforming weight based on the channel estimate (Fig 3 Paragraphs [0060] and [0067] partial precoding information); and communicating data between the second network entity and the communication device using the part of the frequency-domain beamforming weight Fig. 3 Paragraphs [0069] to [0072] improved precoder information notification). 10. Regarding claim 45, Yuan teaches wherein the intermediate beamforming weight comprises a first intermediate beamforming weight, and wherein transmitting the indication of the intermediate beamforming weight comprises: receiving an indication of a second intermediate beamforming weight from a second network node of the plurality of network nodes; combining the first intermediate beamforming weight and the second intermediate beamforming weight to form a combined intermediate beamforming weight; and transmitting an indication of the combined intermediate beamforming weight to the second network entity (Fig. 3 Paragraphs [0059] to [0072] Full precoding generation). 11. Regarding claim 46, Yuan teaches, wherein the first intermediate beamforming weight, the second intermediate beamforming weight, and the combined intermediate beamforming weight are each a Hermitian matrix of size K X K, where K is a total number of user layers (Yuan, Paragraph [0043] Hermitian matrix). 12. Regarding claim 47, Yuan teaches wherein the indication of the first intermediate beamforming weight, the indication of the second intermediate beamforming weight, and the indication of the combined intermediate beamforming weight are each an indication of upper triangle components or lower triangle components of their respective Hermitian matrix (Yuan, Paragraphs [0062] and [0063] triangle components). 13. Regarding claim 48, Yuan teaches, wherein receiving the scheduling information comprises receiving an indication of user layers to be transmitted in the next transmission time interval, and wherein communicating the data comprises: receiving an intermediate downlink (DL) signal from the second network entity; generating a beamformed DL signal based on the intermediate DL signal and the part of the frequency-domain beamforming weight (Figure 3 Paragraph [0068] and [0069] UE scheduling); and transmitting the beamformed DL signal to the communication device (Figure 3 Paragraph [0068] and [0069] UE scheduling). 14. Regarding claim 49, Yuan teaches wherein receiving the intermediate DL signal comprises receiving a user layer downlink data stream to be transmitted to the communication device (Figure 3 session data flow), and wherein generating the beamformed DL signal comprises: extracting user-layer in-phase and quadrature (IQ) data from the user layer downlink data stream based on the scheduling information; and generating the beamformed DL signal based on the user-layer IQ data and the part of the frequency-domain beamforming weight (Figure 3 Paragraph [0068] and [0069] scheduling and precoding information notification; full precoding generation). 15. Regarding claim 51, Yuan teaches wherein receiving the scheduling information comprises receiving an indication of user layers to be received in the next transmission time interval, and wherein communicating the data comprises: receiving an uplink (UL) signal from the communication device; generating an intermediate UL signal based on the UL signal and the part of the frequency-domain beamforming weight (Figure 3, Paragraph [0043] Hermitian matrix); and transmitting the intermediate UL signal to the second network entity (Paragraph [0068] and [0069] full precoding generation). 16. Regarding claim 52, Yuan teaches further comprising: responsive to receiving the scheduling information, transmitting the scheduling information to a second network node of the plurality of network nodes, wherein the intermediate UL signal is a first intermediate UL signal (Fig. 3 UE scheduling), and wherein transmitting the intermediate UL signal to the second network entity comprises: receiving a second intermediate UL signal from the second network node; combining the first intermediate UL signal and the second intermediate UL signal to form a combined intermediate UL signal (Fig. 3 Scheduling and Precoding Information notification); and transmitting the combined intermediate UL signal to the second network entity (Fig. 3 Paragraphs [0059] to [0072] Full precoding generation). 17. Regarding claim 53, Yuan teaches a network entity in a communications network (Figure 3), the network entity comprising: processing circuitry; and memory coupled to the processing circuitry and having instructions stored therein that are executable by the processing circuitry to cause the network entity to: transmit scheduling information to a first network node of the plurality of network nodes, the scheduling information indicating user layers to be used for communication with a communication device (Figure 3 305; Paragraph [0065] and [0066] MU-MIMO scheduling); receive an indication of an intermediate beamforming weight from the first network node (Fig. 3, Paragraph [0062] to [0064] compressed matrix); determine a part of a frequency-domain beamforming weight based on the indication of the intermediate beamforming weight (Fig 3 Paragraphs [0060] and [0067] partial precoding information); and communicate with the communication device via the first network node using the part of the frequency-domain beamforming weight (Fig. 3 Paragraphs [0069] to [0072] improved precoder information notification). 18. Regarding claim 54, Yuan teaches a first network node in a communications network (Fig. 3), the first network node comprising: processing circuitry; and memory coupled to the processing circuitry and having instructions stored therein that are executable by the processing circuitry to cause the first network node to: receiving scheduling information from a second network entity in the communication network indicating user layers to be used for communication with a communication device (Figure 3 305; Paragraph [0065] and [0066] MU-MIMO scheduling);; determining an intermediate beamforming weight based on a channel estimate associated with a channel between the first network node and the communication device (Fig. 3, Paragraph [0062] to [0064] compressed matrix);; transmitting an indication of the intermediate beamforming weight to the second network entity; determining a part of a frequency-domain beamforming weight based on the channel estimate (Fig 3 Paragraphs [0060] and [0067] partial precoding information); and communicating data between the second network entity and the communication device using the part of the frequency-domain beamforming weight Fig. 3 Paragraphs [0069] to [0072] improved precoder information notification). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 50 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yuan (US 2021/0119674 A1) in view of Herschfelt et al. (US 2022/0286172 A1). 19. Regarding claim 50, Yuan does not explicitly disclose further comprising: responsive to receiving the scheduling information, transmitting the scheduling information to a second network node of the plurality of network nodes; and responsive to receiving the intermediate DL signal, transmitting the intermediate DL signal to the second network node. Herschfelt teaches responsive to receiving the scheduling information, transmitting the scheduling information to a second network node of the plurality of network nodes; and responsive to receiving the intermediate DL signal, transmitting the intermediate DL signal to the second network node (Paragraph [0042] multi-stage distributed beamforming; relays the signal by beamforming to the receiver). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to provide responsive to receiving the scheduling information, transmitting the scheduling information to a second network node of the plurality of network nodes; and responsive to receiving the intermediate DL signal, transmitting the intermediate DL signal to the second network node as taught by Herschfelt in the system of Yuan for increased range, data rate and robustness see Paragraph [0042] of Herschfelt. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure: Raghothaman et al. (US 2021/0243840 A1) Dai et al. (US 2014/0293904 A1) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DIANE LEE LO whose telephone number is (571)270-1952. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8 am - 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Faruk Hamza can be reached at (571)272-7969. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DIANE L LO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2466
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 05, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598517
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593343
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING SIDELINK RESOURCE REQUIRED FOR SIDELINK DRX OPERATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592797
WAKE-UP SIGNAL WAVEFORM DESIGN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587872
USING ORCHESTRATORS FOR FALSE POSITIVE DETECTION AND ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580710
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RESOURCE ALLOCATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+8.5%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 941 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month