Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/691,032

SURGICAL ANCHORS AND SURGICAL ANCHORING METHODS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 11, 2024
Priority
Jan 31, 2022 — provisional 63/305,039 +1 more
Examiner
LE, KHOA TAN
Art Unit
3771
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
International Life Sciences LLC D/B/A Artelon
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
43 granted / 55 resolved
+8.2% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+38.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
83
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
86.7%
+46.7% vs TC avg
§102
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
§112
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 55 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group 1, claims 1-14, in the reply filed on 3/25/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the prior art of Norton does not read on the shared technical feature of amended independent claims 1, 15 and 16. Examiner acknowledges and agrees on this. However, in light of the amendments the shared technical feature of amended independent claims 1, 15 and 16, which is: a surgical anchor for use in a bone cavity, comprising: an anchor body, the anchor body deformable from an insertion configuration to an anchoring configuration; and a flexible, elongated member, the flexible, elongated member comprising: a looped section, the looped section including a proximal portion and a distal portion; and first and second tail sections, the first and second tail sections connected to the looped section at the proximal portion of the looped section; the looped section including an apex, and the first and second tail sections pass transversely through and extend from the apex; and configured such that tensioning the first and second tail sections causes the anchor body to deform into the anchoring configuration, is still not a special technical feature as it does not make a contribution over the prior art in view of US 20110098727 Kaiser et al. (see rejection below). The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Response to Amendment In response to the amendment filed on 3/25/2026, claim 2 has been cancelled, and claims 1, 3-14 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 20110098727 Kaiser et al. (hereinafter Kaiser). Regarding claim 1, Kaiser discloses a surgical anchor (300, Fig. 14), comprising: (a) an anchor body (see upper anchor 150, Fig. 14, paragraph 53), the anchor body deformable from an insertion configuration (see insertion configuration of 150 in Fig. 14) to an anchoring configuration (see an anchoring configuration of anchor body 150 in Fig. 22, paragraph 65; paragraph 42, anchor 150 can have any properties that allow the flexible anchor 150 to change shape); and (b) a flexible, elongated member (see suture construct 300, Fig. 14, paragraph 52), the flexible, elongated member comprising: (i) a looped section (looped section comprising loops 304 and 304’, Fig. 14, paragraph 52), the looped section including a first proximal portion (bottom portion of loop 304 as seen in Fig. 14) and a distal portion (upper portions 308 and 308’ of 304 and 304’ as seen in Fig. 14, paragraph 53), wherein at least part of the distal portion is engaged with the anchor body (upper portions 308 and 308’ of loops 304 and 304 engage with anchor body 150 as seen in Fig. 14, paragraph 53); (ii) first and second tail sections (first and second tail sections 258 and 262, Fig. 14, paragraph 52), the first and second tail sections extending from a second proximal portion (bottom portion of loop 304’ as seen in Fig. 14) of the looped section (ends 258 and 262 extend from the bottom proximal portion of loop 304’ as seen in Fig. 14); and (iii) the looped section including an apex (bottom passage portion 268, Fig. 14, paragraph 52-54), and the first and second tail sections pass transversely through and extend from the apex (ends 258 and 262 pass through bottom passage portion 268 as seen in Fig. 14, paragraph 52-54); wherein the surgical anchor is configured such that tensioning the first and second tail sections causes the apex to move distally relative to the anchor body (paragraph 65, Fig. 14, during tensioning of ends 258 and 262 while the upper anchor body 150 is stationary causes passage portion 268 to move distally toward the anchor upper anchor body 150, the passage portion 268 slides relative to anchor body 150) and the looped section to narrow (paragraph 54, Fig. 14, applying tension to ends 258 and 262 causes the loops 304 and 304’ to reduce in size), causing the anchor body to deform to the anchoring configuration (paragraph 47, 65, Fig. 22, tensioning of ends 258 and 262 causes anchor 150 to deform into the anchoring configuration). Regarding claim 3, Kaiser discloses the limitations of claim 1, and further discloses where the looped section is formed by two overlapping loops of the elongated member (two loops 304 and 304’ as seen in Fig. 14, paragraph 52) and wherein the looped section ends where the first and second tail sections connect to the looped section (loops 304 and 304’ end at passage portion 268 where tail sections 258 and 262 connect as seen in Fig. 14, paragraph 52). Regarding claim 4, Kaiser discloses the limitations of claim 1, and further discloses wherein the looped section comprises more than one complete loop of the elongated member (two loops 304 and 304’ as seen in Fig. 14, paragraph 52), wherein the elongated member, including the looped section and the two tail sections, is a single suture (loops 304 and 304’ and tail sections 258 and 262 are a single suture 254 as seen in Fig. 14, paragraph 52). Regarding claim 5, Kaiser discloses the limitations of claim 1, and further discloses wherein the surgical anchor is configured such that tensioning the first and second tail sections causes the looped section to narrow (paragraph 54, Fig. 14, applying tension to ends 258 and 262 causes the loops 304 and 304’ to reduce in size) and causes the connection between the looped section and the tail sections to move distally (paragraph 65, Fig. 14, during tensioning of ends 258 and 262 while the upper anchor body 150 is stationary causes passage portion 268 to move distally toward the anchor upper anchor body 150, the passage portion 268 slides relative to anchor body 150), causing the anchor body to deform to the anchoring configuration (paragraph 47, 65, Fig. 22, tensioning of ends 258 and 262 causes anchor 150 to deform into the anchoring configuration). Regarding claim 6, Kaiser discloses the limitations of claim 1, and further discloses wherein the first and second tail sections of the elongated member pierce the elongated member at the second proximal portion of the looped section to connect the first and second tail sections to the looped section (tail sections 258 and 262 pierce through passage 268 of the second proximal portion of loop 304’ to connect to the looped portion as seen in Fig. 14, paragraph 54). Regarding claim 7, Kaiser discloses the limitations of claim 6, and further discloses wherein tensioning the first and second tail sections draw the tail sections further through the elongated member where the tail sections pierce the elongated member (pulling on tail sections 258 and 262 is configured to draw them further through passage portion 268 as seen in Fig. 14). Regarding claim 8, Kaiser discloses the limitations of claim 7, and further discloses wherein tensioning the first and second tail sections tightens the looped section (pulling on tail sections 258 and 262 causes loops 304 and 304’ to tighten as seen in Fig. 14, paragraph 54). Regarding claim 9, Kaiser discloses the limitations of claim 1, and further discloses wherein the anchor body comprises a central body portion (central portion of 150 as seen in Fig. 5, 14) and two wings (anchor leg portions 190 as seen in Fig. 5, paragraph 43). Regarding claim 10, Kaiser discloses the limitations of claim 9, and further discloses wherein tensioning the first and second tail sections causes the central body portion to expand in size and causes the two wings to press outwardly (tensioning of tail sections 258 and 262 causes central body portion of 150 to expand into the anchoring configuration and the two wings 190 expand into the anchoring configuration as seen in Fig. 22, paragraph 47, 65). Regarding claim 11, Kaiser discloses the limitations of claim 9, and further discloses wherein the anchor body comprises a sleeve (anchor body 150 having a sleeve configuration, paragraph 41). Regarding claim 12, Kaiser discloses the limitations of claim 11, and further discloses wherein the looped section of the elongate member extends through a cavity of the sleeve (upper looped portions 308 and 308’ of loops 304 and 304’ extend through a cavity of the sleeve as seen in Fig. 14; see detailed view of a similar suture 170 extending through a cavity 162 of sleeve of anchor 150 in Fig. 5, paragraph 43). Regarding claim 13, Kaiser discloses the limitations of claim 12, and further discloses wherein the looped section extends out of the sleeve adjacent to the two wings (upper looped portions 308 and 308’ of loops 304 and 304’ extend out of the sleeve adjacent the two wings 190 as seen in Fig. 14; see a detailed view showing bottom loop of suture 170 extending out of the sleeve of 150 adjacent the two wings 190 at openings 174 and 178 as seen in Fig. 5, paragraph 43). Regarding claim 14, Kaiser discloses the limitations of claim 12, and further discloses wherein the looped section of the elongate member pierces the sleeve adjacent to the two wings (upper looped portions 308 and 308’ of loops 304 and 304’ pierces out of the sleeve of 150 adjacent the two wings 190 as seen in Fig. 14; see a detailed view showing bottom loop of suture 170 pierces out of the sleeve of 150 adjacent the two wings 190 at openings 174 and 178 as seen in Fig. 5, paragraph 43). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KHOA TAN LE whose telephone number is (703)756-1252. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8am - 4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jackie Ho can be reached at 571-272-4696. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHOA TAN LE/Examiner, Art Unit 3771 /MOHAMED G GABR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 11, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 14, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 14, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667353
TISSUE CLOSURE SYSTEMS
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667370
MODULAR MULTIFUNCTIONAL PELVIC FIXATION HEMOSTATIC DEVICE
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12648786
METHODS AND ULTRASONIC DEVICES AND SYSTEMS FOR VESSEL SEALING
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12642612
MEDICAL ROBOTICS SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTING AXIS CONSTRAINTS DURING ACTUATION OF ONE OR MORE MOTORIZED JOINTS
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12605268
MEDICAL DEVICE
3y 11m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+38.7%)
2y 9m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 55 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month