Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/692,331

GROWTH METHOD AND GROWTH DEVICE FOR SILICON CARBIDE CRYSTAL

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 15, 2024
Priority
Mar 29, 2022 — CN 202210314813.2 +1 more
Examiner
SONG, MATTHEW J
Art Unit
1714
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Cec Compound Semiconductor Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
551 granted / 911 resolved
-4.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
961
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
59.3%
+19.3% vs TC avg
§102
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
§112
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 911 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites a “growth method for silicon carbide crystal” in line 1. It is unclear how claim 1 grows silicon carbide because the remaining claim limitations do not recite any method of crystal growth. Claim 1 merely requires monitoring a silicon content in silicon carbide that is evaporated and reducing pressure for nucleation and adjusting characteristic radiation. Claim 1 does not recite any method step, such as a crystal growth temperature, seed crystal, sublimation growth process, temperature gradient etc; therefore, it is unclear how to grow a silicon carbide crystal without any crystal growth steps. The same arguments apply to dependent claims 2-6. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. CN116334748A teaches the partial pressure of silicon can affect the nucleation of silicon carbide on a seed crystal (computer translation [0005]). US 2021/0123157 teaches a SiC growth method where pressure is controlled to create a more suitable crystal growth atmosphere ([0062]). US 2022/0020852 teaches a SiC growth method comprising adjusting a temperature, a pressure, and an atmosphere of the inner space to sublimate the raw material, thereby preparing a silicon carbide ingot grown from the seed crystal ([0012]). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW J SONG whose telephone number is (571)272-1468. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10AM-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kaj Olsen can be reached at 571-272-1344. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MATTHEW J. SONG Examiner Art Unit 1714 /MATTHEW J SONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1714
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 15, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12734464
CRYSTALLIZATION DEVICE, CRYSTALLIZATION SYSTEM, AND CRYSTALLIZATION METHOD
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735805
SUSPENDED LIFTING DEVICE FOR DIVERSION CYLINDER
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12723324
SINGLE CRYSTAL INGOT PULLER WITH HIGH-POWER LASER BEAM AS AUXILIARY HEATING SOURCE
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12723325
DUAL REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS FOR A MONO-CRYSTAL FURNACE AND METHODS FOR PULLING A MONO-CRYSTAL
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12692619
METHOD FOR PRODUCING ALUMINUM NITRIDE SUBSTRATE, ALUMINUM NITRIDE SUBSTRATE, AND METHOD FOR SUPPRESSING INTRODUCTION OF DISLOCATION INTO ALUMINUM NITRIDE GROWTH LAYER
2y 12m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (+14.4%)
3y 8m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 911 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month