Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/692,881

Energy Storage Floor Assembly for a Motor Vehicle, in Particular for a Passenger Car, and Motor Vehicle

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 18, 2024
Examiner
GURARI, EREZ
Art Unit
3615
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allow Rate
729 granted / 932 resolved
+26.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
948
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
46.1%
+6.1% vs TC avg
§102
35.4%
-4.6% vs TC avg
§112
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 932 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 11 and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Stephens (US 2022/0059894). In re claim 1, Stephens discloses an energy storage floor assembly for a motor vehicle, comprising: a floor structure (24) comprising interconnected longitudinal and cross members as bearer elements; and an electrical energy store (20) arranged on an underside of the floor structure and connected to the floor structure (fig. 2), the energy store having a store housing with an upper housing part, by which at least one intermediate space between at least two of the bearer elements is overlapped downwardly in a vertical direction of the vehicle and thereby closed (fig. 2), and having prismatic storage cells (54) arranged in the store housing for storing electrical energy, wherein first ones of the prismatic storage cells are arranged successively along a first stacking direction while forming a first cell module, second ones of the prismatic storage cells are arranged successively along a second stacking direction, running parallel to the first stacking direction, while forming a second cell module, the first and second cell modules are arranged next to one another along a direction of arrangement running perpendicularly to the stacking directions and are joined to one another (fig. 3-5), and the first and second ones of the storage cells are joined to the upper housing part (fig. 9). In re claim 20, Stephens further teaches the energy storage floor assembly as for use with a vehicle (par. 4). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Stephens as provided above and further in view of Jiang (US 2022/0149458). In re claim 12, Stephens differs in that it is silent as to the use of adhesives. Attention, however, is directed to Morishita which teaches the use of adhesives. Attention, however, is directed to Jiang which teaches the use of adhesives between battery cells and the case (par. 81). It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to incorporate adhesives between the first ones of the storage cells and the second one of the storage cells to the upper housing part to properly seal the cells in a manner which assists in the rapid exchange of heat. Claim(s) 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Stephens as provided above and further in view of Einoegg (US 2022/0149458). In re claim 13, Stephens is silent as to the placement of the connection elements. Attention, however, is directed to Einoegg which teaches a similar apparatus wherein each respective storage cell has connection elements and a respective cell housing with a respective housing bottom, which connection elements are arranged on an upper side of the respective cell housing, opposite from the respective housing bottom, and by way of which electrical energy stored in the respective storage cell is provided. It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to incorporate connection elements on the top of each cell housing, as taught by Einoegg in order to provide for the cells to be interconnected in an efficient manner. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 14-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EREZ GURARI whose telephone number is (571)270-1156. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00AM-6:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allen Shriver can be reached at (303)297-4337. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EREZ GURARI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3615
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 18, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 26, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600395
MULTI CHILD STROLLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594857
SYSTEM SOLUTION FOR TWO-PHASE ELECTRIC MACHINE USED FOR VEHICLE PROPULSION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594829
ELECTRIC WORK VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590439
WORKING VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589727
ENERGY CONTROL METHOD AND SYSTEM OF LIFT TRUCK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+4.4%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 932 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month