Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/693,448

NON-ACCESS STRATUM TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Mar 19, 2024
Priority
Sep 20, 2021 — provisional 63/246,011 +1 more
Examiner
PHAM, TIMOTHY X
Art Unit
3648
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
OA Round
2 (Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
836 granted / 968 resolved
+34.4% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
983
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
§103
54.3%
+14.3% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 968 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 06/18/2024 has been considered by the examiner. Preliminary Amendment The present Office Action is based upon the original patent application filed on March 19, 2024 as modified by the preliminary amendment filed on March 19, 2024. Claims 1-16, 24, and 26 are now pending in the present application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-16, 24, and 26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Kim et al. (US 2022/0046423). Regarding claims 1 and 24, Kim discloses a method and a first network function, the method comprising: receiving a request for Non-Access Stratum (NAS) traffic information (paragraphs [0005], [0023]; e.g., non-access stratum (NAS) traffic between a user equipment (UE) and a mobility management node, identifying a ciphering algorithm supported by the UE from a network access request message transmitted from the UE to the mobility management node), wherein the request was transmitted by a second network function (paragraphs [0005], [0023]; see access request message sent from UE to MME); and after receiving the request, sending towards the second network function a report (Fig. 3 step S500; paragraphs [0074], [0103]; e.g., and a report on the determination and detection results may be generate) comprising: user equipment (UE) type information indicating a type of UE and information indicating a number of NAS messages transmitted by UEs of the indicated type (paragraph [0023]; e.g., identifying the UE as a first type of terminal). It is noted that limitation a report including “a NAS message type identifier identifying a type of NAS message and information indicating a number of received NAS messages of the identified type” is omitted to address due to alternate claimed such as “and/or”. Regarding claims 9 and 26, Kim discloses a method and a first network function, the method the method comprising: transmitting towards a second network function a request for Non-Access Stratum (NAS) traffic information (paragraphs [0005], [0023]; e.g., non-access stratum (NAS) traffic between a user equipment (UE) and a mobility management node, identifying a ciphering algorithm supported by the UE from a network access request message transmitted from the UE to the mobility management node); and after transmitting the request, receiving a report (Fig. 3 step S500; paragraphs [0074], [0103]; e.g., and a report on the determination and detection results may be generate) comprising: user equipment (UE) type information indicating a type of UE and information indicating a number of NAS messages transmitted by UEs of the indicated type (paragraph [0023]; e.g., identifying the UE as a first type of terminal), wherein the report was sent by the second network function (paragraphs [0014], [0074]; see the report is sent from MME to UE). It is noted that limitation a report including “a NAS message type identifier identifying a type of NAS message and information indicating a number of received NAS messages of the identified type” is omitted to address due to alternate claimed such as “and/or”. Regarding claims 2 and 10, Kim discloses the method of claims 1 and 9, wherein the request for NAS traffic information is either a one-time request to provide the report once or a subscription request to provide a report periodically or upon an occurrence of a particular condition (paragraphs [0074], [0077]; see registration request). Regarding claims 3 and 11, Kim discloses the method of claims 1 and 9, wherein the request for NAS traffic information comprises a UE identifier identifying a particular UE and/or a UE group identifier identifying a group of UEs (paragraphs [0060], [0077]; e.g., NAS traffic information may include information about a user equipment (UE) and information about a NAS message exchanged between the user equipment (UE) and a network. The information on the user equipment (UE) may include subscriber identifier information (such as IMSI, SUCI or SUPI) (hereinafter referred to as “IMSI”), MSISDN (e.g., a phone number)). Regarding claims 4 and 12, Kim discloses the method of claims 3 and 11, wherein the NAS messages of the identified type and/or the NAS messages transmitted by UEs of the indicated type comprise NAS messages transmitted by the identified UE and/or the identified group of UEs (paragraph [0023]; e.g., identifying the UE as a first type of terminal). Regarding claims 5 and 16, Kim discloses the method of claims 1 and 9, the method further comprising: collecting historical and/or real time NAS traffic information associated with the identified UE and/or the identified group of UEs (paragraphs [0023], [0037]; e.g., detecting abnormal traffic may include a network interface for collecting non-access stratum (NAS) traffic between a user equipment (UE) and a mobility management node). Regarding claims 6 and 13, Kim discloses the method of claims 1 and 9, wherein the identified type of NAS message is one of a UE registration request, a Protocol Data Unit (PDU) session establishment request, a PDU session modification request, or a remote UE report (paragraph [0074]; see registration request). Regarding claims 7 and 14, Kim discloses the method of claims 1 and 9, Kim discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the UE type information comprises UE capability information, a UE model identifier, and/or a UE vendor identifier (paragraphs [0023], [0060]; e.g., The UE 10 may be equipped with or built-in a USIM card including subscriber identify information such as IMSI (International Mobile Subscriber Identify), SUPI (Subscription Permanent Identifier) or SUCI (Subscription Concealed Identifier) for subscriber identification). Regarding claims 8 and 15, Kim discloses the method of claims 1 and 9, wherein the report further comprises any one or a combination of: an AMF identifier identifying a particular AMF, a UE Next Generation Application Protocol (NGAP) identifier (ID), wherein the UE NGAP ID is a Radio Access Node UE NGAP ID or an AMF UE NGAP ID, a Subscription Permanent Identifier (SUPI), or a Globally Unique Temporary Identifier (GUTI) (paragraphs [0023], [0060]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Lee et al. (US 2017/0318463) discloses a UE transmits a NAS connection request to a base station to establish a secure connection based on UE identifier. Kawasaki et al. (US 2022/0015158) discloses a UE sends a NAS message request to AMF for registration procedure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TIMOTHY X PHAM whose telephone number is (571)270-7115. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri: 8:30-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Resha Desai can be reached at 571-270-7792. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TIMOTHY X PHAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 19, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 30, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704619
USER EQUIPMENT COORDINATED RADAR SENSING
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12693406
RADIO FREQUENCY (RF)-BASED RANGING AND IMAGING IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS CIRCUIT, PARTICULARLY FOR A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM (WCS)
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12684520
IMPROVEMENTS IN AND RELATING TO LOCALISATION IN A TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681132
DEVICE IDENTIFICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12656484
RADAR SYSTEM FOR INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENTAL DETECTION
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+16.8%)
2y 8m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 968 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month