Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/693,758

METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING BACK-CONTACT CELL

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 20, 2024
Priority
Sep 30, 2021 — CN 202111165394.2 +1 more
Examiner
RAMOS-DIAZ, FERNANDO JOSE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
LONGI GREEN ENERGY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
14 granted / 17 resolved
+22.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+1.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
60
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
44.5%
+4.5% vs TC avg
§102
37.9%
-2.1% vs TC avg
§112
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 17 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION This Office action responds to the application filed on 03/20/2024. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for a rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 8 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 8 recites the limitation "the first surface passivation layer" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The limitation is established in claim 7, while claim 8 depends on claim 6. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-7, 9, & 10 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Regarding the limitations of Claim 1, “there are a first doped region and a second doped region that are arranged in stagger, and a third region for separating the first doped region and the second doped region; forming a first mask layer on merely a surface of the first doped layer that is located within the first doped region; removing the first doped layer and the first interface passivation layer that are located within the second doped region and the third region;… forming a second mask layer on merely a surface of the second doped layer that is located within the second doped region; removing the second doped layer and the second interface passivation layer that are located on the first mask layer and the third region, and maintaining merely the second interface passivation layer and the second doped layer that are located within the second doped region,” there is no prior art that neither anticipates nor renders obvious the limitations of Claim 1. The closest prior art, Hieda (see, e.g., figs. 1-10) shows a similar method of forming a back contact solar cell, but is missing key features of the method. Hieda fails to show establishing a first doped region, a second doped region, and a third region. Additionally, doesn’t show the steps of forming of the first mask layer in only the first doped region then removing the first doped layer and first interface passivation layer in the second and third region, and alternating to form the second mask layer only on the second doped region then removing the second doped layer and the second interface passivation layer from the first mask layer and the third region. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FERNANDO JOSE RAMOS-DIAZ whose telephone number is (571) 270-5855. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8am-5pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Loke can be reached on 571-272-1657. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FERNANDO JOSE RAMOS-DIAZ/ Examiner, Art Unit 2818 /STEVEN H LOKE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2818
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 20, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12660316
DISPLAY DEVICE, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME AND TILED DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12642121
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND SEMICONDUCTOR MODULE
3y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12622304
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE ASSEMBLY INTERCONNECTION PILLARS AND ASSOCIATED METHODS
3y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12622322
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE HAVING ORDERED WIRE ARRANGEMENT BETWEEN DIFFERENTIAL PAIR CONNECTION PADS
3y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12610595
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICE
4y 3m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+1.5%)
3y 3m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 17 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month