DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Status of Claims
This Office Action is in response to the communication filed on 04/13/2026.
Claims 4-5 and 11-12 have been previously cancelled.
Claims 14-15 have been cancelled and new claims 16-17 have been added.
Claims 1, 8 and 13 have been amended.
6. Claims 1-3, 6-10, 13 and -16-17 are currently pending and are considered below.
Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114
7. A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 04/13/2026 has been entered.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
8. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a):
(a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention.
The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112:
The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention.
9. Claims 1-3, 6-10, 13 and 16-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention.
10. Claims 1 and 8 , the limitations recite “generating a tabular representation of the shared data;”; “…generating a first customized view of the tabular representation …”; “…generating a second customized view of the tabular representation …”; “displaying…a menu listing…wherein the one or more modules summaries each display…when the one or modules are in an unlaunched state:”; and “launching, on the display…”the underlined words are not supported by the specification. The claims do not satisfy the written description requirement if sufficient description of how the claimed function is to be performed are not disclosed by the specification. See MPEP 2161.01.
Possible Allowable Subject Matter
11. Claims 1-3, 6-10, 13 and -16-17 would be allowable if the Applicant were to be able to overcome the 35 U.S.C.112(a) rejections identified above.
Response to Arguments
12. Applicant's arguments filed on 04/13/2026 with respect to the rejection of now amended claims 1 and 8 under 35 U.S.C. 101 have been fully considered and they are persuasive. The rejection of claims 1-3, 6-10, 13 and 16-17 under 35 U.S.C. 101 are therefore withdrawn.
13. Rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102/103(a) have been withdrawn. The following prior art teaches:
14. Lee BYoung Moo (KR 10-2020-0045789) discloses supporting collaboration for an advertising campaign, the method comprising the steps of: a data collection window generating unit that receives a type input in the big data collection window (See al feast page 2 paragraph 7).
15. Hoffman et al. (U.S. Pub. No. 2019/0122251) discloses a system may receive identification information associated with profiles and electronic devices that were exposed to a certain piece of targeted content. The demographic and device data associated with the individuals who were exposed to the targeted content are used to create a control group of individuals who were not exposed to that targeted content. The real-world visit rates of the exposed group and the control group to one or more locations may be monitored over a period of time (or campaign) and evaluated to assess the effectiveness of the targeted content (see at least the Abstract).
16. Vijayan et al. (U.S. Patent No. 11/227,3220 discloses the management system creates customer profiles of the automotive dealership systems’ customers using features of the customers obtained via various sources. The management system assigns a customer category to a customer based on the features included in the customer profile and may generate a customized recommendation of a product and/or service for the customer to purchase at the dealership based at least in part on the customer category (see at least the Abstract).
17. Although these references teaches the limitations of claim 1, the prior art does not specifically teach the limitations of the amended claim such as “generating a first customized view of the tabular representation and presenting the first customized view within a first widget of the dashboard on the first device; generating a second customized view of the tabular representation and presenting the second customized view within a second widget of the dashboard on the second device; generating alarm date in response to the data associated with the campaign satisfying a condition, and
switching a material of the campaign between active and inactive status in response to an input received from the first device or the second device via the dashboard.
18. Upon further search and consideration, the Examiner notes that no prior art has been found that teaches the amended limitations noted above.
Conclusion
19. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARILYN G MACASIANO whose telephone number is (571)270-5205. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 12:00-9:00 pm.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, llana Spar can be reached at 571)270-7537. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/MARILYN G MACASIANO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3622 06/26/2026
Prosecution Insights