Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Adriel Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Adriel Inc. is currently managing 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, so each pending matter is being reviewed by a different individual. However, both actions are located within 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a unified technical focus for the company's current patent efforts in the transportation and e-commerce sector.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is MACASIANO, MARILYN G, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since there are 2 pending office actions in total, the workload is split between MACASIANO, MARILYN G and the other distinct examiner. This distribution requires the applicant to address different examiner styles while operating within the same technical framework of 1 distinct art unit. This concentration can help in maintaining a consistent procedural approach for both filings.

With 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, the company has a manageable prosecution workload. The fact that both examiners are in a single art unit is beneficial, as it likely means they follow similar procedural rules and technical standards within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. Practitioners can focus on the specific feedback from MACASIANO, MARILYN G and her colleague to advance these filings. This environment allows for a clear and targeted approach to securing patent rights.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MACASIANO, MARILYN G 1 57.5% +17.1%
GIERINGER, MELINDA J 1 32.9% +25.2%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18694933 METHOD, SYSTEM, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION ON ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN GIERINGER, MELINDA J 56d overdue
18694935 METHOD, SYSTEM AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM FOR SUPPORTING COLLABORATION FOR ADVERTISEMENT CAMPAIGN MACASIANO, MARILYN G —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18694933 METHOD, SYSTEM, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION ON ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN GIERINGER, MELINDA J 56d overdue
18694935 METHOD, SYSTEM AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM FOR SUPPORTING COLLABORATION FOR ADVERTISEMENT CAMPAIGN MACASIANO, MARILYN G —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3622 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18694935 METHOD, SYSTEM AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM FOR SUPPORTING COLLABORATION FOR ADVERTISEMENT CAMPAIGN MACASIANO, MARILYN G 3622 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 23, 2024
18694933 METHOD, SYSTEM, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION ON ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN GIERINGER, MELINDA J 3622 §101 Non-Final OA 56d overdue Pending Jul 23, 2024

Managing Adriel Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month