Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/695,398

LIQUID CRYSTAL ELASTOMER PRECURSOR SOLUTION MATERIAL AND PHOTOPOLYMERIZATION APPARATUS FOR PREPARING LIQUID CRYSTAL ELASTOMER WITH THE SAME

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Mar 26, 2024
Priority
May 26, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0064824 +1 more
Examiner
STOFFA, WYATT A
Art Unit
2881
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Seoul National University R&Db Foundation
OA Round
2 (Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
812 granted / 1016 resolved
+11.9% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
59 currently pending
Career history
1095
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
61.8%
+21.8% vs TC avg
§102
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
§112
20.7%
-19.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1016 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments and amendments, filed 12/30/25, with respect to the obviousness rejections of claims 5, 9, and 14 have been fully considered and overcome the rejections of record. Accordingly, those rejections have been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 16-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Joralmon, Dylan, et al. "Three-dimensional printing of liquid crystals with thermal sensing capability via multimaterial vat photopolymerization." ACS Applied Polymer Materials 4.4(2022): 2951-2959 [hereinafter Joralmon] in view of Ditter, David, et al. "Microfluidic synthesis of liquid crystalline elastomer particle Transport systems which can Be Remote-controlled magnetically." Advanced Functional Materials 29.29 (2019): 1902454 [hereinafter Ditter]. Regarding Claim 16: Joralmon teaches a photopolymerization method for preparing a liquid crystal elastomer using liquid crystal elastomer precursor solution material (abstract, Fig. 2) comprising said liquid crystal elastomer precursor solution material comprises photocurable reactive mesogen, EDDET (2,2'-(ethylenedioxy)diethanethiol), and 5CB (4-cyano-4- pentylbiphenyl) (section 4.1), wherein the method comprises the following steps: irradiating the liquid crystal elastomer precursor solution material with light by a light source to cure the liquid crystal elastomer precursor solution material by a photopolymerization reaction (See Fig. 2b). However, Joralmon fails to teach: disposing magnets around the liquid crystal elastomer precursor solution material, forming a magnetic field in the liquid crystal elastomer precursor solution material to orient liquid crystal molecules; and moving the magnet to control a direction of the magnetic field by an actuator. Ditter teaches a method of preparing a liquid crystal elastomer, comprising disposing magnets around the liquid crystal elastomer precursor solution material (See Fig. 4 and description thereof), forming a magnetic field in the liquid crystal elastomer precursor solution material to orient liquid crystal molecules (see Fig. 5 and description thereof); and moving the magnet to control a direction of the magnetic field by an actuator (Fig. 4 description explains turning the magnet). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective time of filing to add the magnet and associated turning steps of Ditter to the photocuring of Jorelmon. One would have been motivated to do so in order to magnetically control the synthesized liquid crystalline elastomer particles (Ditter abstract). Regarding Claim 17: The above modified invention teaches the photopolymerization method of claim 16 wherein at the step of irradiating the liquid crystal elastomer precursor solution material, light irradiated from the light source is selectively reflected and transferred, by a DMD (digital micromirror device) or a digital mask, toward the liquid crystal elastomer precursor solution material in which the liquid crystal molecules are oriented, thereby forming a pattern with complex shapes. Joralmon Figs 2a (DMD), Fig. 2c. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5, 7, 8, 10-15 are allowed. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WYATT A STOFFA whose telephone number is (571)270-1782. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 0700-1600 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ROBERT KIM can be reached at 571 272 2293. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. WYATT STOFFA Primary Examiner Art Unit 2881 /WYATT A STOFFA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2881
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 26, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 26, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 30, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 13, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12638426
Interface Between Liquid Chromatography, Ionization Device, and Mass Spectrometer, and Sample Analysis Method Using the Same
3y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12620550
METHOD OF PERFORMING METROLOGY ON A MICROFABRICATION PATTERN
3y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12609269
Inspection System
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12607582
OPTICAL EXTRACTION PROBE FOR ELECTRON MICROSCOPE AND OTHER VACUUM CHAMBERS
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12607577
AUGMENTATION OF ELECTRON ENERGY LOSS SPECTROSCOPY IN CHARGED PARTICLE MICROSCOPES
3y 0m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.4%)
2y 3m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1016 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month