Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 30, 2026
Application No. 18/696,445

SIGNALING FOR INTER-RAT HANDOVER OF REDCAP UES

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Mar 28, 2024
Priority
Oct 01, 2021 — provisional 63/251,112 +1 more
Examiner
MANOHARAN, MUTHUSWAMY GANAPATHY
Art Unit
2647
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
OA Round
2 (Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
414 granted / 634 resolved
+3.3% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
685
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
68.3%
+28.3% vs TC avg
§102
18.6%
-21.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 634 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tan et al. (hereinafter Tan)(US 2023/0038753) in view of Pan et al. (hereinafter Pan)(US 2023/0413039). claim 24, Tan teaches a method performed by a target network node, handover of a Wireless Communication Device, WCD, from a source network node to the target network node, the method (Fig. 14, source gNB and target gNB) comprising: receiving, at the target network node, a message in association with preparation or execution of a handover of a WCD from the source network node to the target network node of, the message comprising information about one or more capabilities of the WCD(Fig. 14; handover request containing reduced capability UE); determining that the WCD is a Reduced Capability, RedCap, WCD based on the information about the one or more capabilities of the WCD(P[0072], reduced capability; limited capabilities; P[0123], capabilities supported by the UE); and sending an indication that the WCD is a RedCap WCD to a core network node(Fig. 14; handover request to AMF). Tan did not teach specifically inter-radio access technology handover from a source node of a first RAT to the target node of a second RAT; sending a RedCap indication that the WCD is a RedCap WCD from the target network node to a core network node. However, Pan teaches in an analogous art inter-radio access technology handover from a source node of a first RAT to the target node of a second RAT; sending a RedCap indication that the WCD is a RedCap WCD from the target network node to a core network node (P[0257], handed over from a first network to a second network; first network may be a 4G or an LTE network and the second network may be a 5G network or an NR network; also figs. 7 or 8; item S704 or S804, redcap information from the target network to a core network node). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use inter-radio access technology handover from a source node of a first RAT to the target node of a second RAT; sending a RedCap indication that the WCD is a RedCap WCD from the target network node to a core network node in order to have wider applicability. Regarding claim 25, Tan teaches the method of claim 24, wherein receiving the message comprises receiving the message from another network node during preparation for the handover of the WCD from the source network node to the target network node(Fig. 14). Regarding claim 26, Tan teaches the method of claim 25, wherein the message comprises a transparent container information element that comprises the information about the one or more capabilities of the WCD(P[0088], transparent container; reduced capability UE information). Regarding claim 27, Tan teaches the method the method of claim 26, wherein the information comprised in the transparent container information element is transparent to one or more network nodes through which the transparent container propagated from the source network node to the target network node(P[0088], handover request message to the target gNB, where the source to target transparent container cell contains the reduced capability NR UE information). Regarding claim 28, Tan teaches the method of claim 25, wherein the other network node is the core network node(Fig. 14). Regarding claim 29, Tan teaches the method method of claim 24, wherein: the message comprising the information about the one or more capabilities of the WCD is a Handover Request message; and sending the indication that the WCD is a RedCap WCD to the core network node comprises sending a Handover Request Acknowledge message to the core network node, the Handover Request Acknowledge message comprising the indication that the WCD is a RedCap WCD(Fig. 14; P[0088]). Regarding claim 30, Tan teaches the method of claim 24, wherein receiving the message comprises receiving the message during execution of the handover of the WCD from the source network node to the target network node(Fig. 14). Regarding claim 31, Tan teaches the method of claim 30, wherein receiving the message during execution of the handover of the WCD from the source network node to the target network node comprises receiving a message from the WCD comprising the information about one or more capabilities of the WCD(P[0123], reduced capability; capabilities supported by the UE; also Fig. 4 and Fig. 14). Regarding claim 32, Tan teaches the method of claim 30, wherein receiving the message during execution of the handover of the WCD from the source network node to the target network node comprises receiving a Handover Confirm message from the WCD during execution of the handover of the WCD from the source network node to the target network node, the Handover Confirm message comprising the information about the one or more capabilities of the WCD(Fig. 12, handover acknowledgement containing resources based on reduced capability of UE) . Regarding claim 33, Tan teaches the method of claim 32, wherein sending the indication that the WCD is a RedCap WCD to the core network node comprises sending a Handover Notify message to the core network node, the Handover Notify message comprising the indication that the WCD is a RedCap WCD(Fig. 14). Regarding claim 34, Tan in view of Pan teaches the method of claim 24, wherein sending the indication that the WCD is a RedCap WCD to the core network node comprises sending a N2 Path Switch Request message to the core network node, the N2 Path Switch Request message comprising the indication that the WCD is a RedCap WCD(Tan: Fig. 14; Handover request between source AMF and target AMF). Regarding claim 35, Tan teaches the method of claim 34, wherein receiving the message that comprises the information about the one or more capabilities of the WCD comprises receiving a Handover Request message comprising handover preparation information, the handover preparation information comprising the information about the one or more capabilities of the WCD(Fig. 14; handover request containing reduced capability of NE). Regarding claim 36, Tan teaches the method of claim 34, wherein receiving the message that comprises the information about the one or more capabilities of the WCD comprises receiving a Radio Resource Control, RRC, Re-configuration Complete message from the WCD during execution of the handover, the RRC Re-configuration Complete message comprising the information about the one or more capabilities of the WCD(P[0082], Handover request acknowledgement; reduced capability UE information; Fig. 12; reconfiguration message Fig. 3). Regarding claim 37, Tan teaches the method of claim 34, wherein receiving the message that comprises the information about the one or more capabilities of the WCD comprises receiving a dedicated random access preamble that indicates that the WCD is a RedCap WCD(P[0109], random access preamble with radio capability information; reduced capability). Regarding claim 38, Tan teaches the method of claim 24, wherein:(a) the information about the one or more capabilities of the WCD comprises an explicit indication that the WCD is a RedCap WCD; or (b) the information about the one or more capabilities of the WCD comprises information that implicitly indicates that the WCD is a RedCap WCD(P[0178], reduced capability information is explicitly indicated; reduced capability of UE). Claims 39-40 are rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 1. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUTHUSWAMY GANAPATHY MANOHARAN whose telephone number is (571)272-5515. The examiner can normally be reached 6:30am-3:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alison T Slater can be reached at 571-270-0375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MUTHUSWAMY G MANOHARAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 28, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 04, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 12, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12720462
USER EQUIPMENT POWER CONSUMPTION MODELING
5y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12713348
ADAPTIVE PROCESSING ENVELOPE BASED ON POWER CONSUMPTION
4y 0m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12706662
ROTATIONAL ALIGNMENT FOR MULTIPLE-INPUT MULTIPLE-OUTPUT DEVICES
4y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701622
Connection Resume Request Method and Apparatus
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695820
SMARTPHONE CASE WITH REAR-FACING VIEWFINDER DISPLAY
1y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+15.8%)
3y 7m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 634 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month