Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/698,842

BAND SAW BLADE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING BAND SAW BLADE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 05, 2024
Priority
Oct 14, 2021 — JP 2021-168801 +1 more
Examiner
DONG, LIANG
Art Unit
3724
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Amada Machinery Co. Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Final)
52%
Grant Probability
Moderate
4-5
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 52% of resolved cases
52%
Career Allowance Rate
258 granted / 492 resolved
-17.6% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
567
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
85.9%
+45.9% vs TC avg
§102
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
§112
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 492 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Response to Amendment The Amendment filed 5/03/2026 has been entered. Claims 3-4 remain pending in the application. Claim 1-2 were cancelled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Dawson (US 3615309) in view of Tobert (US 2686439) and Albinsson (US 20040168551 A1). Regarding claim 3, Dawson teaches a method for manufacturing a band saw blade which is provided with a body portion having a band-like and an endless shape (see Figure 7); and a coat layer which is formed on a surface of the teeth of the tooth portion (see Figure 12), the method comprising: performing a coat layer formation step of forming the coat layer on the teeth of an intermediate blade in which the teeth are all straight teeth (see Figure 7). Dawson fails to teach a tooth portion in which a tooth group, which is a set of a predetermined number of teeth including a set tooth, is repeatedly formed on one edge side of the body portion; then performing set processing of setting and forming a predetermined tooth into the set tooth on which the coat layer is formed into the set tooth. Tobert teaches performing a coating step then setting the tooth after the coating step (making the teeth then move on to a setting step, col. 3 lines 36- col. 4 line 6). Albinsson teaches a band saw blade which is provided with a body portion having an endless shape, a device for setting teeth on a saw blade (see Figure 2-3), to create a tooth portion in which a tooth group, which is a set of a predetermined number of teeth including a set tooth, is repeatedly formed on one edge side of the body portion (see Figure 2-3). As discussed by Tobert, the teeth on a saw blade can be first coated, then the coated teeth can be set (col. 3 lines 36- col. 4 line 6 of Tobert). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the method of Dawson to further set the teeth of the bandsaw, as taught by Albinsson and set the teeth after the coating step, as taught by Tobert, in order to product a bandsaw blade with set tooth. As one of ordinary skill in the art understand that set tooth saw are produced for cutting desired shape kerf wanted by the end user. Regarding claim 4, modified Dawson further teaches in the coat layer formation step, the intermediate blade and a band-like spacer (57) are lapped and wound so as to expose the tooth portion (band of 58, wound and expose blade 10, see Figure 10), thereby forming a coil body having a spiral coil shape, and the formed coil body is put into a coating device to form the coat layer (reel of 50, see Figure 7 of Dawson). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 5/03/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 3-4 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LIANG DONG whose telephone number is (571)270-0479. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 8 AM-6 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ashley Boyer can be reached at 571-272-4502. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LIANG DONG/Examiner, Art Unit 3724 5/13/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 05, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 04, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 03, 2026
Response Filed
May 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673438
BLADESET FOR A HAIR CUTTING APPARATUS WITH TAPERED TEETH
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12661818
ELECTRIC BEARD TRIMMER
5y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661819
GLUE-CORE SEPARATION OPERATION SYSTEM AND EQUIPMENT FOR SEPARATING GLUE-CORE OF CONVEYOR BELT JOINT BEFORE VULCANIZATION
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654242
WINDOW COVERING CUTTING APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12643165
SIZE POSITIONING DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
52%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+32.3%)
2y 11m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 492 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month