Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Amada Machinery Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Amada Machinery Co. Ltd. currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These matters are distributed across 2 distinct examiners but are concentrated within 1 distinct art unit. This concentration suggests that while different individuals are reviewing the applications, the subject matter remains within a specific technical niche at the USPTO.

DONG, LIANG is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This represents a portion of the total pending workload for the company, suggesting a focused examination path despite the involvement of multiple examiners. The presence of distinct examiners for the pending actions means that the applications in the current pipeline are being handled by different individuals, requiring the applicant to adapt to different examination styles.

The alignment of the active matters within the specified art unit indicates a consistent classification of the company's mechanical and medical innovations. Practitioners should note that while the examiners differ, the underlying policy and prior art trends of that specific unit will likely influence both pending matters. This structure allows for some predictability in the examination environment even as the company engages with multiple USPTO personnel.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
3
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (67%)
§102 only1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MACKEY, PATRICK HEWEY 1 83.6% +12.4%
DONG, LIANG 1 53.2% +32.9%
LEE, LAURA MICHELLE 1 54.9% +30.9%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18846487 PRODUCT CARRYING-OUT DEVICE AND PRODUCT CARRYING-OUT METHOD FOR STEEL MATERIAL CUTTING MACHINE MACKEY, PATRICK HEWEY —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18846487 PRODUCT CARRYING-OUT DEVICE AND PRODUCT CARRYING-OUT METHOD FOR STEEL MATERIAL CUTTING MACHINE MACKEY, PATRICK HEWEY —
18698842 BAND SAW BLADE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING BAND SAW BLADE DONG, LIANG —
18567740 STRUCTURE BODY CUTTING SYSTEM, STRUCTURE BODY CUTTING METHOD, AND CUTTER SYSTEM LEE, LAURA MICHELLE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3724 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18846487 PRODUCT CARRYING-OUT DEVICE AND PRODUCT CARRYING-OUT METHOD FOR STEEL MATERIAL CUTTING MACHINE MACKEY, PATRICK HEWEY — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 12, 2024
18698842 BAND SAW BLADE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING BAND SAW BLADE DONG, LIANG 3724 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 05, 2024
18567740 STRUCTURE BODY CUTTING SYSTEM, STRUCTURE BODY CUTTING METHOD, AND CUTTER SYSTEM LEE, LAURA MICHELLE 3724 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 06, 2023

Managing Amada Machinery Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month