Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/700,894

CONNECTOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 12, 2024
Examiner
FERGUSON, MICHAEL P
Art Unit
3619
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Nature Architects Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
793 granted / 1253 resolved
+11.3% vs TC avg
Strong +74% interview lift
Without
With
+74.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1301
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
42.7%
+2.7% vs TC avg
§102
25.3%
-14.7% vs TC avg
§112
28.5%
-11.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1253 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 1 (line 3) “the thickness” should recite –a thickness--. In claim 1 (line 5) “the first member side” should recite –a first member side--. In claim 1 (line 6) “the second member side” should recite –a second member side--. For the purpose of examining the application, it is assumed that appropriate correction has been made. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hunt (EP 0 317 564) in view of Tanimichi (“Research on helical surface structure realized by additive manufacturing”. Master’s Thesis of 2008.). As to claim 1, Hunt discloses a connector connecting a first member and a second member, comprising: at least one spiral part 14a in a shape where a thickness is added to a spiral surface formed by a spiral trajectory in which a line, connecting a first point located adjacent a center axis passing through a first position on the first member side and a second position on the second member side and a second point located at a position away from the center axis, rotates around the center axis with the first point as a center while the first point moves in a direction along the center axis, wherein the connector is integrally molded as a whole (Figure 2; C8 L12-18; C8 L56-C9 L8). Hunt discloses a connector wherein the first point of the spiral surface is located offset from the center axis; instead of on the center axis. Tanimichi teaches a spiral part in a shape where a thickness is added to a spiral surface formed by a spiral trajectory in which a line, connecting a first point located on a center axis passing through a first position on a first side and a second position on a second side and a second point located at a position away from the center axis, rotates around the center axis with the first point as a center while the first point moves in a direction along the center axis, wherein the connector is integrally molded as a whole; the central shaft portion defined by the spiral part extending from the center axis providing for greater bending and compressive rigidity of the spiral part (Figure 2-4; Chapters 2,4,5). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the connector disclosed by Hunt wherein the spiral parts extend from the center axis to define a central shaft portion, as taught by Tanimichi, in order to provide for greater bending and compressive rigidity of the connector. As to claim 2, Hunt discloses a connector wherein the connector includes a plurality of spiral parts 14a (Figure 2). As to claim 3, Hunt discloses a connector wherein the spiral part 14a is formed so that a pitch in a direction along the center axis is constant (Figure 2). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL P FERGUSON whose telephone number is (571)272-7081. The examiner can normally be reached M-F (10:00 am-7:00 pm EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anna Momper can be reached at (571)270-5788. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. 01/21/26 /MICHAEL P FERGUSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3619
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601198
PANEL FOR A RACKABLE BARRIER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595819
HINGE SYSTEM WITH ADJUSTABLE RESISTANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584328
MODULAR FENCE ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577980
FLOATING JOINT AND ULTRASONIC VIBRATION JOINING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577978
IMPROVED HINGE ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+74.1%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1253 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month