Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 12, 2026

Nature Architects Inc.

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (75%)
1
Medium (25%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (25%)
§103 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
25% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
2
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TANENBAUM, TZVI SAMUEL 1 68.2% +9.6%
NGUYEN, CHI Q 1 82.3% +12.4%
FERGUSON, MICHAEL P 1 63.5% +73.0%
COTHRAN, BERNARD E 1 45.5% +15.9%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18871165 STRUCTURE TANENBAUM, TZVI SAMUEL
18867604 STRUCTURE NGUYEN, CHI Q
17765036 PROGRAM, DESIGN AID APPARATUS AND DESIGN AID METHOD COTHRAN, BERNARD E

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18700894 CONNECTOR FERGUSON, MICHAEL P 71d
18867604 STRUCTURE NGUYEN, CHI Q
17765036 PROGRAM, DESIGN AID APPARATUS AND DESIGN AID METHOD COTHRAN, BERNARD E

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3619 1
2188 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18871165 STRUCTURE TANENBAUM, TZVI SAMUEL §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 03, 2024
18867604 STRUCTURE NGUYEN, CHI Q §102§112 Non-Final OA Pending Nov 20, 2024
18700894 CONNECTOR FERGUSON, MICHAEL P 3619 §103 Final Rejection 71d Pending Apr 12, 2024
17765036 PROGRAM, DESIGN AID APPARATUS AND DESIGN AID METHOD COTHRAN, BERNARD E 2188 §101§103 Final Rejection Pending Mar 30, 2022

Managing Nature Architects Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month