Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/701,722

FUEL CELL SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 16, 2024
Priority
Oct 28, 2021 — GB 2115488.5 +1 more
Examiner
GATEWOOD, DANIEL S
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Rolls-Royce plc
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
883 granted / 1133 resolved
+17.9% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
1177
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
58.0%
+18.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.0%
-19.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1133 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
FUEL CELL SYSTEM DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 7/3/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claims 11 and 12 are objected to because of the following informalities: please amend to “The fuel cell system according to claim 10, wherein…” or another appropriate format. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 13 is objected to because of the following informalities: please amend to “The fuel cell system according to claim 11, further comprising…” or another appropriate format. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 14 is objected to because of the following informalities: please amend to “A propulsion system comprising a fuel cell system according to claim 10, wherein an electric propulsor is arranged to…” or another appropriate format. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 16 is objected to because of the following informalities: please amend to “The fuel cell system according to claim 12, further comprising…” or another appropriate format. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 17 is objected to because of the following informalities: please amend to “A propulsion system comprising a fuel cell system according to claim 11, wherein an electric propulsor is arranged to…” or another appropriate format. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 18 is objected to because of the following informalities: please amend to “A propulsion system comprising a fuel cell system according to claim 12, wherein an electric propulsor is arranged to…” or another appropriate format. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 19 is objected to because of the following informalities: please amend to “A propulsion system comprising a fuel cell system according to claim 13, wherein an electric propulsor is arranged to…” or another appropriate format. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 20 is objected to because of the following informalities: please amend to “A propulsion system comprising a fuel cell system according to claim 16, wherein an electric propulsor is arranged to…” or another appropriate format. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 11, 13, 17, 19, 21, and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 11 recites the limitation "the remainder of the flow”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 13, 17, 19, 21, and 23 are also rejected under 35 USC 112(b) for their dependence on claim 11. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 10, 12, 14-16, 18, 20, 22, and 24 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the closest prior art is Hu et al. (CN 110957504 A) and Marandi et al. (Energy Conversion and Management, 244 (2021) 114532). Hu et al. discloses a fuel cell system (Fig. 1) comprising a fuel cell (20), a liquid hydrogen tank (50, and an electric motor (40) which can act as a heater. The system comprises a conveying means which extends from the motor outlet (403) to the fuel cell inlet (201) and comprises a heat exchanger (30) which transfers heat from the fuel cell coolant to the hydrogen. However, Hu et al. do not disclose the cooling circuit implements a Rankine cycle including a condenser. Marandi disclose coupling a Rankine cycle with a cooling circuit of a fuel cell. Fig. 1 shows cold hydrogen derived from a liquid hydrogen tank is thermally coupled with a condenser of the Rankine cycle. However, neither reference teaches wherein the pre-heater is arranged to heat coolant fluid within the cooling circuit. While many references teach using multiple heaters to heat liquid hydrogen to gaseous hydrogen and to heat cooling fluid, they do not disclose one pre-heater doing both. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL S GATEWOOD whose telephone number is (571)270-7958. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ula Tavares-Crockett can be reached at 571-272-1481. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Daniel S. Gatewood, Ph.D. Primary Examiner Art Unit 1729 /DANIEL S GATEWOOD, Ph. D/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1729 August 4th, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 16, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749676
POSITIVE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICE, POSITIVE ELECTRODE FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICE, ENERGY STORAGE DEVICE, AND ENERGY STORAGE APPARATUS
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744281
SEPARATOR FOR LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY COMPRISING SAME
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744202
POSITIVE ACTIVE MATERIAL, POSITIVE ELECTRODE PLATE, ELECTROCHEMICAL ENERGY STORAGE APPARATUS, AND APPARATUS
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738487
OLIVINE-BASED CATHODE MATERIALS WITH IMPROVED CONDUCTIVITY
4y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738597
INGREDIENT FOR SECONDARY CELL SEPARATOR COATING MATERIAL, SECONDARY CELL SEPARATOR COATING MATERIAL, SECONDARY CELL SEPARATOR, METHOD FOR PRODUCING SECONDARY CELL SEPARATOR, AND SECONDARY CELL
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+18.8%)
2y 11m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1133 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month