Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/702,093

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING WORKOUT GUIDE VIDEO

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Apr 17, 2024
Priority
Dec 28, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0190372 +2 more
Examiner
UTAMA, ROBERT J
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Drax Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
495 granted / 820 resolved
-9.6% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+29.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
869
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
§103
38.6%
-1.4% vs TC avg
§102
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
§112
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 820 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 1, 4-6, 11 and 15 are objected to because of the following informalities: the use of the word may create ambiguities on what the applicant is referring to. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claims 4-6 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. In this particular case, the limitation of 4-6 are already incorporated to the limitation of claim 1 and as such the dependent limitation claim 4-6 fails to provide further limitation to the limitation of claim 1. Similarly, the limitation of claim 15 contain a similar limitation to the limitation of claim 11. As such, it is unclear how the limitation of claim 15 futher limit the limitation of claim 11. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-2, 7-10, 12-13 allowed. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT J UTAMA whose telephone number is (571)272-1676. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 - 17:30 Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kang Hu can be reached at (571)270-1344. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT J UTAMA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 17, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 06, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 06, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 07, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12682776
MIXED REALITY SCENARIO GENERATION FOR CROSS-INDUSTRY TRAINING
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676077
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED ADAPTIVE LEARNING PATHWAY BUILDER
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676079
ADAPTIVE LEARNING IN A DIVERSE LEARNING ECOSYSTEM
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12664907
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ADAPTIVE APPAREL DESIGN AND APPAREL INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12664908
CONTENT-DRIVEN VIRTUAL AGENT FACILITATOR FOR ONLINE GROUP ACTIVITY
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+29.6%)
3y 8m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 820 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month