Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/703,118

METHOD OF PRODUCING CARBON GRAPHITE PRODUCTS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 19, 2024
Priority
Oct 21, 2021 — RU 2021130743 +1 more
Examiner
LEE, EDMUND H
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Science And Innovations - Nuclear Industry Scientific Development Private Enterprise
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
803 granted / 1157 resolved
+9.4% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1195
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
74.7%
+34.7% vs TC avg
§102
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
§112
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1157 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-4 are objected to because of the following informalities: A colon should be inserted after “comprising” (cl 1:1); and The word “and” should be insert after “workpiece;” (cl 1:3). Appropriate correction is required. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The phrase “them” (cl 1:2) is indefinite because it is unclear to what is refers. If the phrase refers to the container with the fill therein, it should be clearly and explicitly recited as such, e.g. the phrase should be replaced with –the container with the fill therein--. The phrase “the container is placed in a closed vessel” (cl 1:3-4) is indefinite because it is unclear whether the container is the same as the fired container with the fill therein. If the phrase refers to the fired container with the fill therein, it should be clearly and explicitly recited as such, e.g. the phrase should be replaced with –the fired container with the fill therein is placed in a closed vessel”. The phrase “the workpieces are fired at heating to a temperature” (cl 4:1-2) is indefinite because it is unclear what is meant by “fired at heating”. If the phrase refers to firing by heating to a temperature, it should be clearly and explicitly recited as such. Corrections are required. Claims 1-4 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: the prior art of record including the closest prior art KR20130143506 neither teaches nor renders obvious every claimed limitation including the fill of the container is urea which is loaded in an amount of 5-10 wt.% of the workpieces; and the container is placed in a closed vessel with limited access of air which is filled with a carbon fill also containing urea in an amount of 5-10 wt.% of the fill. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The following references teach baking/firing graphite material: WO2010082645, WO2065483; DE10124299; AND KR20130143506. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EDMUND H LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-1204. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 9AM-4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xiao (Sam) Zhao can be reached at 571-270-5343. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. EHL /EDMUND H LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1744
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12668022
THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTING
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661844
INSERT FOR VACUUM FORMING
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654359
CONTROL METHOD FOR 3D PRINTER FOR CONSTRUCTION
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651682
CONDUCTIVE MEMBER AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOF
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12643299
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING FLUID-FILLED CHAMBERS
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+17.8%)
3y 0m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1157 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month