Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 0 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Science And Innovations - Nuclear Industry Scientific Development Private Enterprise has 4 pending office actions currently active. These actions are handled by 4 distinct examiners, showing that each pending matter is assigned to a unique individual. The data indicates 0 distinct art units for this portfolio, which may reflect a lack of classification data for the pending actions or a specialized technical focus that has not been categorized into standard art units. This distribution suggests that the company's prosecution efforts are spread across several different reviewers.
David Bochna is the busiest examiner for the company with 1 pending office action. Since there are 4 pending office actions and 4 distinct examiners, the workload is evenly distributed, and the busiest examiner pending count is 1. This one-to-one ratio of examiners to pending actions means that no single examiner holds a majority of the cases. The company must therefore manage four different examiner relationships and styles. Practitioners should focus on the individual tendencies of each of the 4 distinct examiners to effectively resolve the 4 pending office actions currently on the docket, especially given the 0 distinct art units reported.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 2 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHIRSAT, VIVEK K | 1 | 74.1% | +28.1% |
| BOCHNA, DAVID | 1 | 79.8% | +13.6% |
| CHIU, TAK LIANG | 1 | 48.8% | +20.7% |
| LEE, EDMUND H | 1 | 69.6% | +17.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18719183 | RESTRAINING SEAL | BOCHNA, DAVID | — |
| 18719172 | TANK FOR FILTERING AND COLLECTING DEBRIS | CHIU, TAK LIANG | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18719169 | DEVICE FOR COMBUSTING AMMONIA | SHIRSAT, VIVEK K | — |
| 18719183 | RESTRAINING SEAL | BOCHNA, DAVID | — |
| 18719172 | TANK FOR FILTERING AND COLLECTING DEBRIS | CHIU, TAK LIANG | — |
| 18703118 | METHOD OF PRODUCING CARBON GRAPHITE PRODUCTS | LEE, EDMUND H | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18719169 | DEVICE FOR COMBUSTING AMMONIA | SHIRSAT, VIVEK K | — | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 12, 2024 |
| 18719183 | RESTRAINING SEAL | BOCHNA, DAVID | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 12, 2024 |
| 18719172 | TANK FOR FILTERING AND COLLECTING DEBRIS | CHIU, TAK LIANG | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 12, 2024 |
| 18703118 | METHOD OF PRODUCING CARBON GRAPHITE PRODUCTS | LEE, EDMUND H | — | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 19, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial