Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/704,680

DOUBLE-SIDED COPPER CLAD LAMINATE, CAPACITOR ELEMENT AND PRINTED WIRING BOARD WITH BUILT-IN CAPACITOR, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DOUBLE-SIDED COPPER CLAD LAMINATE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Apr 25, 2024
Priority
Oct 28, 2021 — JP 2021-176712 +1 more
Examiner
DINH, TUAN T
Art Unit
2847
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
944 granted / 1198 resolved
+10.8% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1229
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
45.0%
+5.0% vs TC avg
§102
38.5%
-1.5% vs TC avg
§112
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1198 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Note: One megapascal (MPa) is equal to approximately 0.102 kgf/mm² (kilogram-force per square millimeter). Conversely, 1 kgf/mm² equals 9.807 MPa. (Note: "kg/mm²" technically measures mass rather than force, but in engineering it is commonly used as a shorthand for kilogram-force, kgf/mm². Therefore, 20 kgf/mm² equal 196.14 MPa. The tensile strength of standard epoxy resin typically ranges from 5,000 to 14,000 psi (35 to 97 MPa), though specialized structural or high-performance formulations can reach up to 17,500 psi (120 MPa) depending on the chemical mixture and how it is cured. The tensile strength of a polyimide-modified epoxy resin typically ranges from 70 MPa to 110 MPa (roughly 10,000 to 16,000 psi), depending heavily on the ratio of polyimide blended into the matrix, the specific curing agents used, and test temperatures. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, 9, and 11-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a(1) as being anticipated by Kuwako et al. (WO 2015125928 A1), hereafter Kuwako. As to claims 1, 13-14, Kuwako discloses a printed circuit board (20) as shown in figures 3-4 with built-in capacitor/capacitor element (10) comprising a double-sided copper clad laminate (1) having copper foil (3) adhered onto both surfaces of a dielectric layer (F), wherein the dielectric layer (the resin film F) has a thickness of 0.1 µm or more and 2.0 µm or less (0.1 µm to 2.0 µm), the thickness of the dielectric layer (F) in a range of 0.5 µm to 25 µm, and wherein the double-sided copper clad laminate (1) further comprises a pair of resin layers (4) arranged in contact with the copper foil (3) between the dielectric layer (F) and the copper foil (3), and an overall tensile strength of the dielectric layer (F) and the resin layers is 50 MPa or more and 200 MPa or less (the resin film F made from epoxy resin material has the tensile strength of 35 MPa to 97 MPa), and the resin layer 4 made from epoxy, polyimide, or polyamide has the tensile strength about 70 MPa to 110 MPa; therefore, the overall tensile strength in a range of 50 MPa to 200 MPa). As to claim 2, Kuwako discloses a tensile strength of the resin layers (the thermosetting resin has a tensile strength about 200 MPa) is larger than a tensile strength of the dielectric layer (100 MPa). As to claim 4, Kuwako discloses an overall puncture strength or force of the dielectric layer (the polyamide about 40-100 MPa) and the resin layers (the polyimide about 203-297 MPa) is 0.6 N or more. As to claim 5, Kuwako discloses at least one of the resin layers (4) and the dielectric layer (F) comprises a dielectric filler. As to claim 9, Kuwako discloses the resin layers (4) are free from the dielectric filler and the dielectric layer (F) comprise the dielectric filler. As to claim 11, Kuwako discloses a glass transition temperature Tg of resin contained in the resin layers (the element 4 made from a polyimide resin has Tg in a range of 200°C -400°C) is 180°C or higher. As to claim 12, Kuwako discloses a glass transition temperature Tg of resin contained in the resin layers (the element 4 made from a polyimide resin has Tg in a range of 200°C -400°C) is higher than a glass transition temperature Tg of resin contained in the dielectric layer (the polyamide F has Tg in between 40°C -90°C). As to claim 15, Kuwako discloses a method for manufacturing the double-sided copper clad laminate (1) according to claim 1, comprising the steps of in figure 2: (i) applying a resin layer (4) precursor to a copper foil (3); (ii) curing the precursor to obtain the copper foil (3) with the resin layer (4); (iii) arranging a dielectric layer (F) on a surface of the resin layer (4); and (iv) pressing the copper foil (3) with the resin layer (4) on which the dielectric layer (F) has been arranged and another copper foil (another element 3) with another resin layer (another element 4) produced through the above steps(i) and (ii), so that the dielectric layer (F) is sandwiched by the resin layers from both sides. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-8, and 10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 06/10/26 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues: Kuwako fails to disclose or suggest the subject matter of amended claim 1, which recites that an overall tensile strength of the dielectric layer and the resin layers is 50 MPa or more and 200 MPa or less. After carefully review, examiner respectively disagrees. Kuwako discloses the resin film F made from epoxy resin material has the tensile strength of 35 MPa to 97 MPa, and the resin layer 4 made from epoxy, polyimide, or polyamide has the tensile strength about 70 MPa to 110 MPa; therefore, the overall tensile strength in a range of 50 MPa to 200 MPa. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TUAN T DINH whose telephone number is (571)272-1929. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-5pm, M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Dole can be reached at 571-272-2229. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TUAN T DINH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2847
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 25, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 10, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750955
EMBEDDED PACKAGE STRUCTURE, POWER SUPPLY APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12740147
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733099
ELECTRONICS PACKAGING FOR MOVING PLATFORMS
4y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12733100
REDUCING PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD AREA FOR SINGLE-SIDED PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727086
FLEXIBLE CIRCUIT BOARD AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THEREOF
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.1%)
2y 11m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1198 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month