Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/707,581

PHOTOELECTRIC DEVICE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND DISPLAY APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
May 04, 2024
Priority
Nov 04, 2021 — CN 202111302002.2 +1 more
Examiner
NETTLES, CORALIE ANN
Art Unit
2893
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
TCL Technology Group Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
26 granted / 43 resolved
-7.5% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
104
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
59.0%
+19.0% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
§112
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 43 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, Species 1b in the reply filed on August 24, 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 2, and 11-20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Group and Species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on August 24, 2026. Specification The disclosure is objected to because it contains extensive minor informalities, such as: In ¶ [0027], line 9: “transfered” should read --transferred-- In ¶ [0039], line 6: “transfered” should read --transferred-- In ¶ [0045], line 1: “Specifically, Using” should read --Specifically, using-- In ¶ [0045], line 8: “inproving” should read --improving-- In ¶ [0051], line 5: “hickness” should read --thickness-- In ¶ [0056], line 4: “the the hole transport layer” should read -- the hole transport layer-- In ¶ [0063], line 6: “a smart watche” should read --a smart watch-- In ¶ [0078], lines 9 and 12: “composit” should read --composite-- The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Objections Claim 7 is objected to because of the following informalities: In line 3: “greater than 0: 1 and less than or equal to 5: 1” should read --greater than 0:1 and less than or equal to 5:1-- Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 8, the claim recites the limitation “a metal electrode, a silicon carbon electrode, a doped or non-doped metal oxide electrode, and a composite electrode” in lines 12-13. However, antecedent basis was already provided for these terms in claim 8, lines 2-3. It is indefinite as to whether these electrodes are intended to be the same electrodes as recited in lines 2-3 or different electrodes. For the purposes of examination, the latter interpretation will be used. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3-5, and 8-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yoon et al. (US 20180138434 A1) herein after “Yoon”. Regarding claim 1, Fig. 2 of Yoon discloses a photoelectric device (Fig. 2, quantum dot light-emitting diode 200, ¶ [0083]) comprising an anode (Fig. 2, first electrode 210, ¶ [0083]), a light-emitting layer (Fig. 2, luminous material layer 250, ¶ [0083]), an electronic function layer (Fig. 2, interface control layer 240, ¶ [0083]), and a cathode (Fig. 2, second electrode 220, ¶ [0083]) disposed in stack; wherein a material of the electronic function layer (240) comprises a two-dimensional montmorillonite nanosheet (“the interface control layer 240 may be formed of… a nanoclay-polymer composite”, ¶ [0097], “examples of the nanoclay may include… sodium montmorillonite”, ¶ [0071]). Regarding claim 3, Fig. 2 of Yoon discloses the photoelectric device according to claim 1 as applied above, and Fig. 2 of Yoon further discloses wherein the two-dimensional montmorillonite nanosheet is selected from one or more of a calcium-based two-dimensional montmorillonite nanosheet, a sodium-based two-dimensional montmorillonite nanosheet, a sodium-calcium-based two-dimensional montmorillonite nanosheet, and a magnesium-based two- dimensional montmorillonite nanosheet (“examples of the nanoclay may include… sodium montmorillonite”, ¶ [0071]). Regarding claim 4, Fig. 2 of Yoon discloses the photoelectric device according to claim 1 as applied above, and Fig. 2 of Yoon further discloses wherein the two-dimensional montmorillonite nanosheet is obtained by an inorganic modification or an organic modification (“the organic modifier of the nanoclay may include a cationic surfactant”, ¶ [0076]); wherein the inorganic modification comprises using one or more of an inorganic acid and an inorganic salt to modify; the organic modification comprises using one or more of an organic acid, a surfactant, a polymer monomer, and a coupling agent to modify. Regarding claim 5, Fig. 2 of Yoon discloses the photoelectric device according to claim 4 as applied above, and Fig. 2 of Yoon further discloses wherein the inorganic acid is selected from one or more of sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, and phosphoric acid; the organic acid is selected from one or more of a carboxylic acid, a sulfonic acid, a sulfinic acid, and a thiocarboxylic acid; the inorganic salt is selected from one or more of a halogen salt, a nitrate, a sulfate, a phosphate, a carboxylate, a sulfonate, a sulfinate, and a thiocarboxylate salt including aluminum, magnesium, zinc, copper, or sodium; the surfactant is selected from one or more of a cationic surfactant, an anionic surfactant, and a nonionic surfactant (“the organic modifier of the nanoclay may include a cationic surfactant”, ¶ [0076]); the polymer monomer is selected from one or more of methyl methacrylate, N- vinyl pyrrolidone, pyrrole, ethylene terephthalate, and ethylene naphthalate; the coupling agent is selected from one or more of a silane coupling agent, a titanate coupling agent, and a polyurethane coupling agent. Regarding claim 8, Fig. 2 of Yoon discloses the photoelectric device according to claim 1 as applied above, and Fig. 2 of Yoon further discloses wherein the anode (210) is selected from one or more of a metal electrode, a silicon carbon electrode, a doped or non-doped metal oxide electrode, and a composite electrode (“the first electrode 210 may be formed of a doped or undoped metal oxide such as ITO, IZO, ITZO, ICO, SnO.sub.2, In.sub.2O.sub.3, Cd:ZnO, F:SnO.sub.2, In:SnO.sub.2, Ga:SnO.sub.2 or AZO, or a metal material containing nickel (Ni), platinum (Pt), gold (Au), silver (Ag), iridium (Ir), or carbon nanotubes”, ¶ [0084]); wherein a material of the metal electrode is selected from one or more of Al, Ag, Cu, Mo, Au, Ba, and Ca; a material of the silicon carbon electrode is selected from one or more of silicon, graphite, carbon nanotube, graphene and carbon fiber; a material of the doped or non- doped metal oxide electrode is selected from one or more of AZO, GZO, IZO, and AMO; a material of the composite electrode is selected from one or more of AZO/Ag/AZO, AZO/Al/AZO, ITO/Ag/ITO, ITO/Al/ITO, ZnO/Ag/ZnO, ZnO/Al/ZnO, TiO2/Ag/TiO2, TiO2/Al/TiO2, ZnS/Ag/ZnS, ZnS/Al/ZnS, TiO2/Ag/TiO2, and TiO2/AI/TiO2; the cathode (220) is selected from one or more of a metal electrode, a silicon carbon electrode, a doped or non-doped metal oxide electrode, and a composite electrode (“the second electrode 220 may include Ca, Ba, Ca/Al, LiF/Ca, LiF/Al, BaF.sub.2/Al, CsF/Al, CaCO.sub.3/Al, BaF.sub.2/Ca/Al, Al, Mg, Au:Mg, or Ag:Mg”, ¶ [0085]); wherein a material of the metal electrode is selected from one or more of Al, Ag, Cu, Mo, Au, Ba, and Ca; a material of the silicon carbon electrode is selected from one or more of silicon, graphite, carbon nanotube, graphene and carbon fiber; a material of the doped or non-doped metal oxide electrode is selected from one or more of ITO, FTO, ATO, AZO, GZO, IZO, MZO, and AMO; a material of the composite electrode is selected from one or more of AZO/Ag/AZO, AZO/AI/AZO, ITO/Ag/ITO, ITO/Al/ITO, ZnO/Ag/ZnO, ZnO/AI/ZnO, TiO2/Ag/TiO2, TiO2/AI/TiO2, ZnS/Ag/ZnS, ZnS/AI/ZnS, TiO2/Ag/TiO2, and TiO2/AI/TiO2; a material of the light-emitting layer (250) is selected from one or more of a quantum dot with single structure, a quantum dot with a core-shell structure, and a perovskite semiconductor material (“The luminous material layer 250 may be a layer filled, for example, with quantum dots 252”, ¶ [0090]); the single structure quantum dot is selected from one or more of a group II-VI compound, a group IV-VI compound, a group III-V compound, a group I-III-VI compound (“The quantum dots 252 may have a single structure”, ¶ [0090]); the group II-VI compound is selected from one or more of CdS, CdSe, CdTe, ZnS, ZnSe, ZnTe, ZnO, HgS, HgSe, HgTe, CdSeS, CdSeTe, CdSTe, ZnSeS, ZnSeTe, ZnSTe, HgSeS, HgSeTe, HgSTe, CdZnS, CdZnSe, CdZnTe, CdHgS, CdHgSe, CdHgTe, HgZnS, HgZnSe, HgZnTe, CdZnSeS, CdZnSeTe, CdZnSTe, CdHgSeS, CdHgSeTe, CdHgSTe, HgZnSeS, HgZnSeTe, and HgZnSTe (“the quantum dots 252 may be alloy quantum dots (e.g., CdS.sub.xSe.sub.1-x, CdSe.sub.xTe.sub.1-x, or Zn.sub.xCd.sub.1-xSe)”, ¶ [0091]); the group IV-VI compound is selected from one or more of SnS, SnSe, SnTe, PbS, PbSe, PbTe, SnSeS, SnSeTe, SnSTe, PbSeS, PbSeTe, PbSTe, SnPbS, SnPbSe, SnPbTe, SnPbSSe, SnPbSeTe, and SnPbSTe; the group III-V compound is selected from one or more of GaN, GaP, GaAs, GaSb, AIN, AlP, AIA s, AISb, InN, InP, InAs, InSb, GaNP, GaNAs, GaNSb, GaPAs, GaPSb, AINP, AINAs, AINSb, AIPAs, AIPSb, InNP, InNAs, InNSb, InPAs, InPSb, GaAINP, GaAINAs, GaAINSb, GaAIPAs, GaAIPSb, GaInNP, GaInNAs, GaInNSb, GaInPAs, GaInPSb, InAINP, InAINAs, InAINSb, InAIPAs, and InAIPSb; the group I-III-VI compound is selected from oneor more of CuInS2, CuInSe2 , and AgInS2; a core of the quantum dot with a core-shell structure is selected from any one of the single structure quantum dots; a shell material of the quantum dot with a core-shell structure is selected from one or more of CdS, CdTe, CdSeTe, CdZnSe, CdZnS, CdSeS, ZnSe, ZnSeS, and ZnS; the perovskite semiconductor material is selected from a doped or non-doped inorganic perovskite type semiconductor, an organic perovskite semiconductor or an organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite type semiconductor; the inorganic perovskite type semiconductor has a general structural formula of AMX3, wherein A is Co2+ and M is a divalent metal cation which is selected from one or more of Pb2+, Sn2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, Cd2+, Cr2+,Mn2+, Co2+, Fe2+, Ge2+, Yb2+, and Eu2+, and X is a halogen anion which is selected from one or more of Cl~, Br~, and I~; the organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite type semiconductor has a general structural formula of CMX3, wherein C is a formamidyl, and M is a divalent metal cation which is selected from one or more of Pb2+, Sn2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, Cd2+, Cr2+, Mn2+, Co2t+, Fe2+, Ge2+, Yb2+, and Eu2+, and X is a halogen anion which is selected from one or more of CI-, Br, and I-; the organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite type semiconductor has a general structural formula of BMX3, wherein B is an Organic amine cation which is selected from one or more of CH3(CH2)n-2NH3+or [NH3(CH2)n1NH3]2+, wherein n>2, and M is a divalent metal cation which is selected from one or more of Pb2+, Sn2+, Cu2+, Ni2t+, Cd2+, Cr2+, Mn2+, Co2+, Fe2+, Ge2+, Yb2+, and Eu2+, and X is a halogen anion which is selected from one or more of Cl, Br, and I. Regarding claim 9, Fig. 2 of Yoon discloses the photoelectric device according to claim 1 as applied above, and Fig. 2 of Yoon further discloses wherein the photoelectric device further comprises a hole transport layer (Fig. 2, hole transport layer (HTL) 234, ¶ [0086]) disposed between the anode (210) and the light-emitting layer (250); the photoelectric device further comprises a hole injection layer (Fig. 2, hole injection layer (HIL) 232, ¶ [0086]) disposed on a surface of the anode (210) facing one side of the cathode (220); the photoelectric device further comprises an electron transport layer (Fig. 2, electron transport layer (ETL) 264, ¶ [0093]) disposed between the light-emitting layer (250) and the cathode (220); the photoelectric device further comprises an electron injection layer (Fig. 2, electron injection layer (EIL) 262, ¶ [0093]) disposed on a surface of the cathode (220) facing one side of the anode (210). Regarding claim 10, Fig. 2 of Yoon discloses the photoelectric device according to claim 1 as applied above, and Fig. 2 of Yoon further discloses wherein a thickness of the electronic functional layer (240) is 1 nm to 50 nm (“the interface control layer 240 may be stacked to a thickness of 1 to 30 nm”, ¶ [0098]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yoon (US 20180138434 A1) in view of Al-Harthi et al. (US 20170206997 A1) herein after “Al-Harthi”. Regarding claim 6, Fig. 2 of Yoon discloses the photoelectric device according to claim 1 as applied above, and Fig. 2 of Yoon further discloses wherein the material of the electronic function layer (240) comprises a composite of the two-dimensional montmorillonite nanosheet and a polymer (“the interface control layer 240 may be formed of… a nanoclay-polymer composite”, ¶ [0097]). Yoon fails to explicitly disclose the polymer is selected from one or more of polymethyl methacrylate, polyimide, polyamide-imide, and polyethylene. In the similar field of endeavor of nanocomposite films, Al-Harthi discloses the polymer is selected from one or more of polymethyl methacrylate, polyimide, polyamide-imide, and polyethylene (“Suitable polymers may be selected from the group including…, poly(methyl methacrylate)…, polyethylenes…, polyamide imides…, thermosetting polyimides, thermoplastic polyimides”, ¶ [0137]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the time of the effective filling date of the invention to modify the electronic function layer of Yoon with the polymers as disclosed by Al-Harthi, to obtain the desired film properties (see Al-Harthi, ¶ [0136-0137]) and/or because the use of conventional materials to perform their known function is prima-facie obvious (MPEP 2144.07). Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yoon (US 20180138434 A1) and Al-Harthi (US 20170206997 A1) in further view of Lee et al. (“Efficient Photoluminescence and Electroluminescence from Environmentally Stable Polymer/Clay Nanocomposites”) herein after “Lee”. Regarding claim 7, Yoon and Al-Harthi together disclose the photoelectric device of claim 6 as applied above, but the combination fails to explicitly disclose wherein, in the composite, a mass ratio of the polymer to the two-dimensional montmorillonite nanosheet is greater than 0:1 and less than or equal to 5:1. In the similar field of endeavor of polymer/clay nanocomposite materials, Lee discloses that changing the mass ratio of polymer to clay material in a layer changes the electronic properties of the layer (Figs. 5-6 of Lee show the changes in current/voltage characteristics and quantum efficiency of devices that contact polymer/clay nanocomposite materials of ratios from 1:1 to 5:1). In light of Lee’s teaching of the effect of the mass ratio on the electronic properties of the layer, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to ascertain and employ a desired/optimal mass ratio range via routine experimentation, such as that claimed, as it has been held that “where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, it is not inventive to discover the optimum or workable ranges by routine experimentation.” See MPEP 2144.05, citing In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454, 456, 105 USPQ 233, 235 (CCPA 1955). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CORALIE NETTLES whose telephone number is (571)270-5374. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. 11:30am-7pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yara J Green can be reached at (571) 270-3035. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.A.N./Examiner, Art Unit 2893 /YARA B GREEN/Supervisor Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2893
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 04, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765099
PHOTODIODE WITH DEEP TRENCH ISOLATION STRUCTURES
3y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12707796
IMAGING DEVICE AND IMAGING APPARATUS
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701808
SOLID-STATE IMAGING DEVICE, METHOD OF PRODUCING THE SAME, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701748
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12674094
SEMICONDUCTOR NANOPARTICLE, AND COLOR CONVERSION PANEL AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+31.7%)
3y 5m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 43 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month