Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/709,099

DETERMINATION OF A PROPERTY OF AN EXPOSURE LIGHT BEAM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 10, 2024
Examiner
ASFAW, MESFIN T
Art Unit
2882
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Cymer LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
794 granted / 961 resolved
+14.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
994
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.6%
+13.6% vs TC avg
§102
38.4%
-1.6% vs TC avg
§112
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 961 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The preliminary amendment filed on May 10, 2024 has been entered. Claims 1-8, 11, 12, 15-17, 19, 20, 22, 23 and 25-27 are pending in this application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-8, 11, 12, 15-17, 19, 20, 22, 23 and 25-27 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Seong et al. [US 20110205512 A1, hereafter Seong] in view of Ohkubo et al. [US 20150073752 A1, hereafter Ohkubo]. As per Claims 1, 17 and 23, Seong teaches an apparatus (a lithography system 100) comprising: an estimation system configured to: determine a set of values related to an initial light beam based on sensed wavefronts; and determine an estimate of a property of an exposure light beam (See fig. 1, Para 5 and 13). Seong does not explicitly teach determine an estimate of a property of an exposure light beam based on a non-linear relationship that comprises the first value and the second value. Ohkubo teaches an apparatus (the wavefront measuring apparatus 100) comprising: an estimation system (the wavefront estimating unit 203) configured to: determine a set of values related to an initial light beam based on sensed wavefronts of the initial light beam, the set of values comprising a first value (the measured wavefront WM1) and a second value (Para 57, an estimated wavefront WM2); and determine an estimate of a property of light beam based on a non-linear relationship that comprises the first value and the second value, wherein the light beam is formed by interacting the initial light beam with an optical system (Para 59-60, the wavefront estimating unit 203 estimates the wavefront W of the test optical system TO by solving a non-linear problem by numerical analysis); and a communications module coupled to the estimation system and configured to output the estimate of the property of the light beam (See fig. 6, Para 64, the measured wavefront of the optical system that is measured by the wavefront measuring apparatus 100 in the present embodiment, and that outputs image and data on which aberration correction is digitally performed by signal processing based on the measured wavefront). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at time the invention was made to incorporate an estimation system of Ohkubo in the apparatus of Seong in order to produce an improved control of a spectral property of an exposure light beam. As per Claim 2, Seong in view of Ohkubo teaches the apparatus of claim 1. Ohkubo further disclosed wherein the property of the exposure light beam comprises a convolved bandwidth metric (interference fringe analysis), the convolved bandwidth metric representing a width of a portion of an optical spectrum of the exposure light beam at a wafer that is irradiated by the exposure light beam; and the optical spectrum of the exposure light beam comprises intensity of the exposure light beam as a function of wavelength (Para 72). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at time the invention was made to incorporate an estimation system of Ohkubo in the apparatus of Seong in order to produce an improved control of a spectral property of an exposure light beam. As per Claim 3, Seong in view of Ohkubo teaches the apparatus of claim 1. Ohkubo further disclosed wherein the sensed wavefronts of the initial light beam comprise a fringe pattern produced from the initial light beam; the fringe pattern comprises a plurality of fringes; the first value comprises a first width of a first one of the plurality of fringes; and the second value comprises a second width of a second one of the plurality of fringes (Para 71). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at time the invention was made to incorporate an estimation system of Ohkubo in the apparatus of Seong in order to produce an improved control of a spectral property of an exposure light beam. As per Claim 4, Seong in view of Ohkubo teaches the apparatus of claim 3. Ohkubo further disclosed wherein the first one of the plurality of fringes and the second one of the plurality of fringes are the same one fringe (Para 71-72, the interference fringe). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at time the invention was made to incorporate an estimation system of Ohkubo in the apparatus of Seong in order to produce an improved control of a spectral property of an exposure light beam. As per Claim 5, Seong in view of Ohkubo teaches the apparatus of claim 4. Ohkubo further disclosed wherein the first width is a width of the one fringe at a first percentage of a peak intensity of the one fringe (measured wavefront of the region 1); and the second width (estimated wavefront of the region 2) is a width of the one fringe at a second percentage of the peak intensity of the one fringe (Para 72). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at time the invention was made to incorporate an estimation system of Ohkubo in the apparatus of Seong in order to produce an improved control of a spectral property of an exposure light beam. As per Claim 6, Seong in view of Ohkubo teaches the apparatus of claim 5. Ohkubo further disclosed wherein the first percentage and the second percentage are different percentages (See fig. 11, Para 72). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at time the invention was made to incorporate an estimation system of Ohkubo in the apparatus of Seong in order to produce an improved control of a spectral property of an exposure light beam. As per Claim 7, Seong in view of Ohkubo teaches the apparatus of claim 6. Ohkubo further disclosed wherein the plurality of fringes are concentric rings of light centered around a center point and separated by regions of no light; and the one fringe is the fringe closest to the center point (See fig. 7). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at time the invention was made to incorporate an estimation system of Ohkubo in the apparatus of Seong in order to produce an improved control of a spectral property of an exposure light beam. As per Claim 8, Seong in view of Ohkubo teaches the apparatus of claim 1. Ohkubo further disclosed wherein the non-linear relationship comprises a second-order relationship (Para 59 and 72). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at time the invention was made to incorporate an estimation system of Ohkubo in the apparatus of Seong in order to produce an improved control of a spectral property of an exposure light beam. As per Claim 11, Seong in view of Ohkubo teaches the apparatus of claim 1. Ohkubo further disclosed wherein the estimation system is further configured to: access a reference value of the property of the exposure light beam; and determine values for each of a plurality of calibration parameters by minimizing a difference between the estimate of the property and the reference value of the property (Para 34-36 and 82). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at time the invention was made to incorporate an estimation system of Ohkubo in the apparatus of Seong in order to produce an improved control of a spectral property of an exposure light beam. As per Claim 12, Seong in view of Ohkubo teaches the apparatus of claim 11. Ohkubo further disclosed wherein the reference value of the property is obtained by a spectrometer (Para 33). As per Claim 15, Seong in view of Ohkubo teaches the apparatus of claim 3. Ohkubo further disclosed further comprising an etalon configured to produce the fringe pattern (See fig. 11, Para 70). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at time the invention was made to incorporate an estimation system of Ohkubo in the apparatus of Seong in order to produce an improved control of a spectral property of an exposure light beam. As per Claim 16, Seong in view of Ohkubo teaches the apparatus of claim 1. Ohkubo further disclosed further comprising a detector configured to sense the wavefronts and to provide data related to the sensed wavefronts to the estimation system (See fig. 11, Para 70-72). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at time the invention was made to incorporate an estimation system of Ohkubo in the apparatus of Seong in order to produce an improved control of a spectral property of an exposure light beam. As per Claim 19, Seong in view of Ohkubo teaches the system of claim 17. Ohkubo further disclosed wherein the estimation system is configured to determine the estimate of the property based on a non-linear relationship; and the non-linear relationship comprises the first value, the second value, and a plurality of calibration constants (Para 59). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at time the invention was made to incorporate an estimation system of Ohkubo in the apparatus of Seong in order to produce an improved control of a spectral property of an exposure light beam. As per Claim 20, Seong in view of Ohkubo teaches the system of claim 19. Ohkubo further disclosed wherein the estimation system is further configured to: determine a value for each of the plurality of calibration constants based on minimizing a difference between the estimate of the property and a reference value of the property (Para 34-36 and 82). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at time the invention was made to incorporate an estimation system of Ohkubo in the apparatus of Seong in order to produce an improved control of a spectral property of an exposure light beam. As per Claim 22, Seong in view of Ohkubo teaches the system of claim 17. seong further disclosed wherein the light source comprises a master oscillator configured to emit a seed light beam, and a power amplifier configured to amplify the seed light beam to produce the light beam comprising deep ultraviolet (DUV) light (Para 3). As per Claims 25-27, Seong in view of Ohkubo teaches the method of claim 23. Ohkubo further disclosed wherein determining the set of values of the initial light beam comprises: obtaining a first value from a first width of a first one of a plurality of fringes; and obtaining a second value from a second width of a second one of the plurality of fringes (Para 72). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at time the invention was made to incorporate an estimation system of Ohkubo in the apparatus of Seong in order to produce an improved control of a spectral property of an exposure light beam. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MESFIN ASFAW whose telephone number is (571)270-5247. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8 am - 4 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Toan Ton can be reached at 571-272-2303. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MESFIN T ASFAW/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2882
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601981
RETICLE STORAGE POD AND METHOD FOR SECURING RETICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596308
MODULAR WAFER TABLE AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURING THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585194
METHOD AND SWAPPING TOOL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578656
EUV LIGHT GENERATION APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578658
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR THERMAL CONDITIONING OF RETICLES IN LITHOGRAPHIC APPARATUSES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+14.2%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 961 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month